La thérapie familiale en francophonie (serveur d'exploration)

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with ‘best practice’ recommendations

Identifieur interne : 001B40 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001B39; suivant : 001B41

Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with ‘best practice’ recommendations

Auteurs : M. A. T. Flynn ; D. A. Mcneil ; B. Maloff ; D. Mutasingwa ; M. Wu ; C. Ford ; S. C. Tough

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:43AFC8EC3AAF2E1AF27810920FFCC44E24FB6BF0

English descriptors

Abstract

Childhood obesity is a global epidemic and rising trends in overweight and obesity are apparent in both developed and developing countries. Available estimates for the period between the 1980s and 1990s show the prevalence of overweight and obesity in children increased by a magnitude of two to five times in developed countries (e.g. from 11% to over 30% in boys in Canada), and up to almost four times in developing countries (e.g. from 4% to 14% in Brazil). The goal of this synthesis research study was to develop best practice recommendations based on a systematic approach to finding, selecting and critically appraising programmes addressing prevention and treatment of childhood obesity and related risk of chronic diseases.  An international panel of experts in areas of relevance to obesity provided guidance for the study. This synthesis research encompassed a comprehensive search of medical/academic and grey literature and the Internet covering the years 1982–2003. The appraisal approach developed to identify best practice was unique, in that it considered not only methodological rigour, but also population health, immigrant health and programme development/evaluation perspectives in the assessment. Scores were generated based on pre‐determined criteria with programmes scoring in the top tertile of the scoring range in any one of the four appraisal categories included for further examination. The synthesis process included identification of gaps and an analysis and summary of programme development and programme effectiveness to enable conclusions to be drawn and recommendations to be made.  The results from the library database searches (13 158 hits), the Internet search and key informant surveys were reduced to a review of 982 reports of which 500 were selected for critical appraisal. In total 158 articles, representing 147 programmes, were included for further analysis. The majority of reports were included based on high appraisal scores in programme development and evaluation with limited numbers eligible based on scores in other categories of appraisal. While no single programme emerged as a model of best practice, synthesis of included programmes provided rich information on elements that represent innovative rather than best practice under particular circumstances that are dynamic (changing according to population subgroups, age, ethnicity, setting, leadership, etc.). Thus the findings of this synthesis review identifies areas for action, opportunities for programme development and research priorities to inform the development of best practice recommendations that will reduce obesity and chronic disease risk in children and youth.  A lack of programming to address the particular needs of subgroups of children and youth emerged in this review. Although immigrants new to developed countries may be more vulnerable to the obesogenic environment, no programmes were identified that specifically targeted their potentially specialized needs (e.g. different food supply in a new country). Children 0–6 years of age and males represented other population subgroups where obesity prevention programmes and evidence of effectiveness were limited. These gaps are of concern because (i) the pre‐school years may be a critical period for obesity prevention as indicated by the association of the adiposity rebound and obesity in later years; and (ii) although the growing prevalence of obesity affects males and females equally; males may be more vulnerable to associated health risks such as cardiovascular disease. Other gaps in knowledge identified during synthesis include a limited number of interventions in home and community settings and a lack of upstream population‐based interventions. The shortage of programmes in community and home settings limits our understanding of the effectiveness of interventions in these environments, while the lack of upstream investment indicates an opportunity to develop more upstream and population‐focused interventions to balance and extend the current emphasis on individual‐based programmes.  The evidence reviewed indicates that current programmes lead to short‐term improvements in outcomes relating to obesity and chronic disease prevention with no adverse effects noted. This supports the continuation and further development of programmes currently directed at children and youth, as further evidence for best practice accumulates. In this synthesis, schools were found to be a critical setting for programming where health status indicators, such as body composition, chronic disease risk factors and fitness, can all be positively impacted. Engagement in physical activity emerged as a critical intervention in obesity prevention and reduction programmes.  While many programmes in the review had the potential to integrate chronic disease prevention, few did; therefore efforts could be directed towards better integration of chronic disease prevention programmes to minimize duplication and optimize resources. Programmes require sustained long‐term resources to facilitate comprehensive evaluation that will ascertain if long‐term impact such as sustained normal weight is maintained. Furthermore, involving stakeholders in programme design, implementation and evaluation could be crucial to the success of interventions, helping to ensure that needs are met.  A number of methodological issues related to the assessment of obesity intervention and prevention programmes were identified and offer insight into how research protocols can be enhanced to strengthen evidence for obesity interventions. Further research is required to understand the merits of the various forms in which interventions (singly and in combination) are delivered and in which circumstances they are effective. There is a critical need for the development of consistent indicators to ensure that comparisons of programme outcomes can be made to better inform best practice.

Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00242.x

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:43AFC8EC3AAF2E1AF27810920FFCC44E24FB6BF0

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with ‘best practice’ recommendations</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Flynn, M A T" sort="Flynn, M A T" uniqKey="Flynn M" first="M. A. T." last="Flynn">M. A. T. Flynn</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Nutrition and Active Living, Healthy Living, Calgary Health Region</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Department of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Alberta</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Mcneil, D A" sort="Mcneil, D A" uniqKey="Mcneil D" first="D. A." last="Mcneil">D. A. Mcneil</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Decision Support Research Team, Child and Women's Health Calgary Health Region</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Graduate Student Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>E-mail: Debbie.McNeil@CalgaryHealthRegion.ca</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Maloff, B" sort="Maloff, B" uniqKey="Maloff B" first="B." last="Maloff">B. Maloff</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Community Development, Healthy Living Calgary Health Region</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Mutasingwa, D" sort="Mutasingwa, D" uniqKey="Mutasingwa D" first="D." last="Mutasingwa">D. Mutasingwa</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Decision Support Research Team, Child and Women's Health Calgary Health Region</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Graduate Student Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wu, M" sort="Wu, M" uniqKey="Wu M" first="M." last="Wu">M. Wu</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Decision Support Research Team, Child and Women's Health Calgary Health Region</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ford, C" sort="Ford, C" uniqKey="Ford C" first="C." last="Ford">C. Ford</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Decision Support Research Team, Child and Women's Health Calgary Health Region</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Graduate Student Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Tough, S C" sort="Tough, S C" uniqKey="Tough S" first="S. C." last="Tough">S. C. Tough</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Decision Support Research Team, Child and Women's Health Calgary Health Region</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Departments of Paediatrics and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:43AFC8EC3AAF2E1AF27810920FFCC44E24FB6BF0</idno>
<date when="2006" year="2006">2006</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00242.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/43AFC8EC3AAF2E1AF27810920FFCC44E24FB6BF0/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001B40</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001B40</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with ‘best practice’ recommendations</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Flynn, M A T" sort="Flynn, M A T" uniqKey="Flynn M" first="M. A. T." last="Flynn">M. A. T. Flynn</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Nutrition and Active Living, Healthy Living, Calgary Health Region</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Department of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Alberta</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Mcneil, D A" sort="Mcneil, D A" uniqKey="Mcneil D" first="D. A." last="Mcneil">D. A. Mcneil</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Decision Support Research Team, Child and Women's Health Calgary Health Region</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Graduate Student Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>E-mail: Debbie.McNeil@CalgaryHealthRegion.ca</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Maloff, B" sort="Maloff, B" uniqKey="Maloff B" first="B." last="Maloff">B. Maloff</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Community Development, Healthy Living Calgary Health Region</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Mutasingwa, D" sort="Mutasingwa, D" uniqKey="Mutasingwa D" first="D." last="Mutasingwa">D. Mutasingwa</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Decision Support Research Team, Child and Women's Health Calgary Health Region</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Graduate Student Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wu, M" sort="Wu, M" uniqKey="Wu M" first="M." last="Wu">M. Wu</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Decision Support Research Team, Child and Women's Health Calgary Health Region</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ford, C" sort="Ford, C" uniqKey="Ford C" first="C." last="Ford">C. Ford</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Decision Support Research Team, Child and Women's Health Calgary Health Region</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Graduate Student Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Tough, S C" sort="Tough, S C" uniqKey="Tough S" first="S. C." last="Tough">S. C. Tough</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Decision Support Research Team, Child and Women's Health Calgary Health Region</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Departments of Paediatrics and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">Obesity Reviews</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1467-7881</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1467-789X</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2006-02">2006-02</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">7</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="supplement">s1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="7">7</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="66">66</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">1467-7881</idno>
</series>
<idno type="istex">43AFC8EC3AAF2E1AF27810920FFCC44E24FB6BF0</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00242.x</idno>
<idno type="ArticleID">OBR242</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">1467-7881</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Child</term>
<term>obesity</term>
<term>synthesis research</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Childhood obesity is a global epidemic and rising trends in overweight and obesity are apparent in both developed and developing countries. Available estimates for the period between the 1980s and 1990s show the prevalence of overweight and obesity in children increased by a magnitude of two to five times in developed countries (e.g. from 11% to over 30% in boys in Canada), and up to almost four times in developing countries (e.g. from 4% to 14% in Brazil). The goal of this synthesis research study was to develop best practice recommendations based on a systematic approach to finding, selecting and critically appraising programmes addressing prevention and treatment of childhood obesity and related risk of chronic diseases.  An international panel of experts in areas of relevance to obesity provided guidance for the study. This synthesis research encompassed a comprehensive search of medical/academic and grey literature and the Internet covering the years 1982–2003. The appraisal approach developed to identify best practice was unique, in that it considered not only methodological rigour, but also population health, immigrant health and programme development/evaluation perspectives in the assessment. Scores were generated based on pre‐determined criteria with programmes scoring in the top tertile of the scoring range in any one of the four appraisal categories included for further examination. The synthesis process included identification of gaps and an analysis and summary of programme development and programme effectiveness to enable conclusions to be drawn and recommendations to be made.  The results from the library database searches (13 158 hits), the Internet search and key informant surveys were reduced to a review of 982 reports of which 500 were selected for critical appraisal. In total 158 articles, representing 147 programmes, were included for further analysis. The majority of reports were included based on high appraisal scores in programme development and evaluation with limited numbers eligible based on scores in other categories of appraisal. While no single programme emerged as a model of best practice, synthesis of included programmes provided rich information on elements that represent innovative rather than best practice under particular circumstances that are dynamic (changing according to population subgroups, age, ethnicity, setting, leadership, etc.). Thus the findings of this synthesis review identifies areas for action, opportunities for programme development and research priorities to inform the development of best practice recommendations that will reduce obesity and chronic disease risk in children and youth.  A lack of programming to address the particular needs of subgroups of children and youth emerged in this review. Although immigrants new to developed countries may be more vulnerable to the obesogenic environment, no programmes were identified that specifically targeted their potentially specialized needs (e.g. different food supply in a new country). Children 0–6 years of age and males represented other population subgroups where obesity prevention programmes and evidence of effectiveness were limited. These gaps are of concern because (i) the pre‐school years may be a critical period for obesity prevention as indicated by the association of the adiposity rebound and obesity in later years; and (ii) although the growing prevalence of obesity affects males and females equally; males may be more vulnerable to associated health risks such as cardiovascular disease. Other gaps in knowledge identified during synthesis include a limited number of interventions in home and community settings and a lack of upstream population‐based interventions. The shortage of programmes in community and home settings limits our understanding of the effectiveness of interventions in these environments, while the lack of upstream investment indicates an opportunity to develop more upstream and population‐focused interventions to balance and extend the current emphasis on individual‐based programmes.  The evidence reviewed indicates that current programmes lead to short‐term improvements in outcomes relating to obesity and chronic disease prevention with no adverse effects noted. This supports the continuation and further development of programmes currently directed at children and youth, as further evidence for best practice accumulates. In this synthesis, schools were found to be a critical setting for programming where health status indicators, such as body composition, chronic disease risk factors and fitness, can all be positively impacted. Engagement in physical activity emerged as a critical intervention in obesity prevention and reduction programmes.  While many programmes in the review had the potential to integrate chronic disease prevention, few did; therefore efforts could be directed towards better integration of chronic disease prevention programmes to minimize duplication and optimize resources. Programmes require sustained long‐term resources to facilitate comprehensive evaluation that will ascertain if long‐term impact such as sustained normal weight is maintained. Furthermore, involving stakeholders in programme design, implementation and evaluation could be crucial to the success of interventions, helping to ensure that needs are met.  A number of methodological issues related to the assessment of obesity intervention and prevention programmes were identified and offer insight into how research protocols can be enhanced to strengthen evidence for obesity interventions. Further research is required to understand the merits of the various forms in which interventions (singly and in combination) are delivered and in which circumstances they are effective. There is a critical need for the development of consistent indicators to ensure that comparisons of programme outcomes can be made to better inform best practice.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex>
<corpusName>wiley</corpusName>
<author>
<json:item>
<name>M. A. T. Flynn</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>Nutrition and Active Living, Healthy Living, Calgary Health Region</json:string>
<json:string>Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary</json:string>
<json:string>Department of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Alberta</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<name>D. A. McNeil</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>Decision Support Research Team, Child and Women's Health Calgary Health Region</json:string>
<json:string>Graduate Student Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary</json:string>
<json:string>E-mail: Debbie.McNeil@CalgaryHealthRegion.ca</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<name>B. Maloff</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>Community Development, Healthy Living Calgary Health Region</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<name>D. Mutasingwa</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>Decision Support Research Team, Child and Women's Health Calgary Health Region</json:string>
<json:string>Graduate Student Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<name>M. Wu</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>Decision Support Research Team, Child and Women's Health Calgary Health Region</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<name>C. Ford</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>Decision Support Research Team, Child and Women's Health Calgary Health Region</json:string>
<json:string>Graduate Student Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<name>S. C. Tough</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>Decision Support Research Team, Child and Women's Health Calgary Health Region</json:string>
<json:string>Departments of Paediatrics and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<subject>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>Child</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>obesity</value>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<lang>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</lang>
<value>synthesis research</value>
</json:item>
</subject>
<articleId>
<json:string>OBR242</json:string>
</articleId>
<language>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre>
<json:string>reviewArticle</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>Childhood obesity is a global epidemic and rising trends in overweight and obesity are apparent in both developed and developing countries. Available estimates for the period between the 1980s and 1990s show the prevalence of overweight and obesity in children increased by a magnitude of two to five times in developed countries (e.g. from 11% to over 30% in boys in Canada), and up to almost four times in developing countries (e.g. from 4% to 14% in Brazil). The goal of this synthesis research study was to develop best practice recommendations based on a systematic approach to finding, selecting and critically appraising programmes addressing prevention and treatment of childhood obesity and related risk of chronic diseases.  An international panel of experts in areas of relevance to obesity provided guidance for the study. This synthesis research encompassed a comprehensive search of medical/academic and grey literature and the Internet covering the years 1982–2003. The appraisal approach developed to identify best practice was unique, in that it considered not only methodological rigour, but also population health, immigrant health and programme development/evaluation perspectives in the assessment. Scores were generated based on pre‐determined criteria with programmes scoring in the top tertile of the scoring range in any one of the four appraisal categories included for further examination. The synthesis process included identification of gaps and an analysis and summary of programme development and programme effectiveness to enable conclusions to be drawn and recommendations to be made.  The results from the library database searches (13 158 hits), the Internet search and key informant surveys were reduced to a review of 982 reports of which 500 were selected for critical appraisal. In total 158 articles, representing 147 programmes, were included for further analysis. The majority of reports were included based on high appraisal scores in programme development and evaluation with limited numbers eligible based on scores in other categories of appraisal. While no single programme emerged as a model of best practice, synthesis of included programmes provided rich information on elements that represent innovative rather than best practice under particular circumstances that are dynamic (changing according to population subgroups, age, ethnicity, setting, leadership, etc.). Thus the findings of this synthesis review identifies areas for action, opportunities for programme development and research priorities to inform the development of best practice recommendations that will reduce obesity and chronic disease risk in children and youth.  A lack of programming to address the particular needs of subgroups of children and youth emerged in this review. Although immigrants new to developed countries may be more vulnerable to the obesogenic environment, no programmes were identified that specifically targeted their potentially specialized needs (e.g. different food supply in a new country). Children 0–6 years of age and males represented other population subgroups where obesity prevention programmes and evidence of effectiveness were limited. These gaps are of concern because (i) the pre‐school years may be a critical period for obesity prevention as indicated by the association of the adiposity rebound and obesity in later years; and (ii) although the growing prevalence of obesity affects males and females equally; males may be more vulnerable to associated health risks such as cardiovascular disease. Other gaps in knowledge identified during synthesis include a limited number of interventions in home and community settings and a lack of upstream population‐based interventions. The shortage of programmes in community and home settings limits our understanding of the effectiveness of interventions in these environments, while the lack of upstream investment indicates an opportunity to develop more upstream and population‐focused interventions to balance and extend the current emphasis on individual‐based programmes.  The evidence reviewed indicates that current programmes lead to short‐term improvements in outcomes relating to obesity and chronic disease prevention with no adverse effects noted. This supports the continuation and further development of programmes currently directed at children and youth, as further evidence for best practice accumulates. In this synthesis, schools were found to be a critical setting for programming where health status indicators, such as body composition, chronic disease risk factors and fitness, can all be positively impacted. Engagement in physical activity emerged as a critical intervention in obesity prevention and reduction programmes.  While many programmes in the review had the potential to integrate chronic disease prevention, few did; therefore efforts could be directed towards better integration of chronic disease prevention programmes to minimize duplication and optimize resources. Programmes require sustained long‐term resources to facilitate comprehensive evaluation that will ascertain if long‐term impact such as sustained normal weight is maintained. Furthermore, involving stakeholders in programme design, implementation and evaluation could be crucial to the success of interventions, helping to ensure that needs are met.  A number of methodological issues related to the assessment of obesity intervention and prevention programmes were identified and offer insight into how research protocols can be enhanced to strengthen evidence for obesity interventions. Further research is required to understand the merits of the various forms in which interventions (singly and in combination) are delivered and in which circumstances they are effective. There is a critical need for the development of consistent indicators to ensure that comparisons of programme outcomes can be made to better inform best practice.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators>
<score>8.5</score>
<pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageSize>595 x 782 pts</pdfPageSize>
<refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative>
<abstractCharCount>5953</abstractCharCount>
<pdfWordCount>35555</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>239891</pdfCharCount>
<pdfPageCount>60</pdfPageCount>
<abstractWordCount>857</abstractWordCount>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with ‘best practice’ recommendations</title>
<genre>
<json:string>review-article</json:string>
</genre>
<host>
<volume>7</volume>
<publisherId>
<json:string>OBR</json:string>
</publisherId>
<pages>
<total>60</total>
<last>66</last>
<first>7</first>
</pages>
<issn>
<json:string>1467-7881</json:string>
</issn>
<genre>
<json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
<language>
<json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<eissn>
<json:string>1467-789X</json:string>
</eissn>
<title>Obesity Reviews</title>
<doi>
<json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1467-789X</json:string>
</doi>
</host>
<categories>
<wos>
<json:string>science</json:string>
<json:string>endocrinology & metabolism</json:string>
</wos>
<scienceMetrix>
<json:string>health sciences</json:string>
<json:string>clinical medicine</json:string>
<json:string>endocrinology & metabolism</json:string>
</scienceMetrix>
<inist>
<json:string>sciences humaines et sociales</json:string>
</inist>
</categories>
<publicationDate>2006</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>2006</copyrightDate>
<doi>
<json:string>10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00242.x</json:string>
</doi>
<id>43AFC8EC3AAF2E1AF27810920FFCC44E24FB6BF0</id>
<score>1</score>
<fulltext>
<json:item>
<extension>pdf</extension>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/43AFC8EC3AAF2E1AF27810920FFCC44E24FB6BF0/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<extension>zip</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/43AFC8EC3AAF2E1AF27810920FFCC44E24FB6BF0/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/43AFC8EC3AAF2E1AF27810920FFCC44E24FB6BF0/fulltext/tei">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with ‘best practice’ recommendations</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<availability>
<p>WILEY</p>
</availability>
<date>2006</date>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct type="inbook">
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with ‘best practice’ recommendations</title>
<author xml:id="author-1">
<persName>
<forename type="first">M. A. T.</forename>
<surname>Flynn</surname>
</persName>
<note type="biography">Currently at Food Safety Authority of Ireland, Dublin.</note>
<affiliation>Currently at Food Safety Authority of Ireland, Dublin.</affiliation>
<affiliation>Nutrition and Active Living, Healthy Living, Calgary Health Region</affiliation>
<affiliation>Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary</affiliation>
<affiliation>Department of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Alberta</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-2">
<persName>
<forename type="first">D. A.</forename>
<surname>McNeil</surname>
</persName>
<email>Debbie.McNeil@CalgaryHealthRegion.ca</email>
<affiliation>Decision Support Research Team, Child and Women's Health Calgary Health Region</affiliation>
<affiliation>Graduate Student Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-3">
<persName>
<forename type="first">B.</forename>
<surname>Maloff</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Community Development, Healthy Living Calgary Health Region</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-4">
<persName>
<forename type="first">D.</forename>
<surname>Mutasingwa</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Decision Support Research Team, Child and Women's Health Calgary Health Region</affiliation>
<affiliation>Graduate Student Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-5">
<persName>
<forename type="first">M.</forename>
<surname>Wu</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Decision Support Research Team, Child and Women's Health Calgary Health Region</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-6">
<persName>
<forename type="first">C.</forename>
<surname>Ford</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Decision Support Research Team, Child and Women's Health Calgary Health Region</affiliation>
<affiliation>Graduate Student Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary</affiliation>
</author>
<author xml:id="author-7">
<persName>
<forename type="first">S. C.</forename>
<surname>Tough</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Decision Support Research Team, Child and Women's Health Calgary Health Region</affiliation>
<affiliation>Departments of Paediatrics and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<title level="j">Obesity Reviews</title>
<idno type="pISSN">1467-7881</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1467-789X</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-789X</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2006-02"></date>
<biblScope unit="volume">7</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="supplement">s1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="7">7</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="66">66</biblScope>
</imprint>
</monogr>
<idno type="istex">43AFC8EC3AAF2E1AF27810920FFCC44E24FB6BF0</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00242.x</idno>
<idno type="ArticleID">OBR242</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<creation>
<date>2006</date>
</creation>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
<abstract xml:lang="en">
<p>Childhood obesity is a global epidemic and rising trends in overweight and obesity are apparent in both developed and developing countries. Available estimates for the period between the 1980s and 1990s show the prevalence of overweight and obesity in children increased by a magnitude of two to five times in developed countries (e.g. from 11% to over 30% in boys in Canada), and up to almost four times in developing countries (e.g. from 4% to 14% in Brazil). The goal of this synthesis research study was to develop best practice recommendations based on a systematic approach to finding, selecting and critically appraising programmes addressing prevention and treatment of childhood obesity and related risk of chronic diseases.  An international panel of experts in areas of relevance to obesity provided guidance for the study. This synthesis research encompassed a comprehensive search of medical/academic and grey literature and the Internet covering the years 1982–2003. The appraisal approach developed to identify best practice was unique, in that it considered not only methodological rigour, but also population health, immigrant health and programme development/evaluation perspectives in the assessment. Scores were generated based on pre‐determined criteria with programmes scoring in the top tertile of the scoring range in any one of the four appraisal categories included for further examination. The synthesis process included identification of gaps and an analysis and summary of programme development and programme effectiveness to enable conclusions to be drawn and recommendations to be made.  The results from the library database searches (13 158 hits), the Internet search and key informant surveys were reduced to a review of 982 reports of which 500 were selected for critical appraisal. In total 158 articles, representing 147 programmes, were included for further analysis. The majority of reports were included based on high appraisal scores in programme development and evaluation with limited numbers eligible based on scores in other categories of appraisal. While no single programme emerged as a model of best practice, synthesis of included programmes provided rich information on elements that represent innovative rather than best practice under particular circumstances that are dynamic (changing according to population subgroups, age, ethnicity, setting, leadership, etc.). Thus the findings of this synthesis review identifies areas for action, opportunities for programme development and research priorities to inform the development of best practice recommendations that will reduce obesity and chronic disease risk in children and youth.  A lack of programming to address the particular needs of subgroups of children and youth emerged in this review. Although immigrants new to developed countries may be more vulnerable to the obesogenic environment, no programmes were identified that specifically targeted their potentially specialized needs (e.g. different food supply in a new country). Children 0–6 years of age and males represented other population subgroups where obesity prevention programmes and evidence of effectiveness were limited. These gaps are of concern because (i) the pre‐school years may be a critical period for obesity prevention as indicated by the association of the adiposity rebound and obesity in later years; and (ii) although the growing prevalence of obesity affects males and females equally; males may be more vulnerable to associated health risks such as cardiovascular disease. Other gaps in knowledge identified during synthesis include a limited number of interventions in home and community settings and a lack of upstream population‐based interventions. The shortage of programmes in community and home settings limits our understanding of the effectiveness of interventions in these environments, while the lack of upstream investment indicates an opportunity to develop more upstream and population‐focused interventions to balance and extend the current emphasis on individual‐based programmes.  The evidence reviewed indicates that current programmes lead to short‐term improvements in outcomes relating to obesity and chronic disease prevention with no adverse effects noted. This supports the continuation and further development of programmes currently directed at children and youth, as further evidence for best practice accumulates. In this synthesis, schools were found to be a critical setting for programming where health status indicators, such as body composition, chronic disease risk factors and fitness, can all be positively impacted. Engagement in physical activity emerged as a critical intervention in obesity prevention and reduction programmes.  While many programmes in the review had the potential to integrate chronic disease prevention, few did; therefore efforts could be directed towards better integration of chronic disease prevention programmes to minimize duplication and optimize resources. Programmes require sustained long‐term resources to facilitate comprehensive evaluation that will ascertain if long‐term impact such as sustained normal weight is maintained. Furthermore, involving stakeholders in programme design, implementation and evaluation could be crucial to the success of interventions, helping to ensure that needs are met.  A number of methodological issues related to the assessment of obesity intervention and prevention programmes were identified and offer insight into how research protocols can be enhanced to strengthen evidence for obesity interventions. Further research is required to understand the merits of the various forms in which interventions (singly and in combination) are delivered and in which circumstances they are effective. There is a critical need for the development of consistent indicators to ensure that comparisons of programme outcomes can be made to better inform best practice.</p>
</abstract>
<textClass xml:lang="en">
<keywords scheme="keyword">
<list>
<head>keywords</head>
<item>
<term>Child</term>
</item>
<item>
<term>obesity</term>
</item>
<item>
<term>synthesis research</term>
</item>
</list>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
<revisionDesc>
<change when="2006-02">Published</change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
<json:item>
<extension>txt</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/43AFC8EC3AAF2E1AF27810920FFCC44E24FB6BF0/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
</fulltext>
<metadata>
<istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body">
<istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:document>
<component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en">
<header>
<publicationMeta level="product">
<publisherInfo>
<publisherName>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisherName>
<publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc>
</publisherInfo>
<doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-789X</doi>
<issn type="print">1467-7881</issn>
<issn type="electronic">1467-789X</issn>
<idGroup>
<id type="product" value="OBR"></id>
<id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id>
</idGroup>
<titleGroup>
<title type="main" sort="OBESITY REVIEWS">Obesity Reviews</title>
</titleGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="part" position="02000">
<doi origin="wiley">10.1111/obr.2006.7.issue-s1</doi>
<numberingGroup>
<numbering type="journalVolume" number="7">7</numbering>
<numbering type="supplement">s1</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<coverDate startDate="2006-02">February 2006</coverDate>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="unit" type="reviewArticle" position="2" status="forIssue">
<doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00242.x</doi>
<idGroup>
<id type="unit" value="OBR242"></id>
</idGroup>
<countGroup>
<count type="pageTotal" number="60"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup>
<title type="tocHeading1">Review Article</title>
</titleGroup>
<eventGroup>
<event type="firstOnline" date="2005-12-20"></event>
<event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2005-12-20"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-10"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-02-06"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-11-03"></event>
</eventGroup>
<numberingGroup>
<numbering type="pageFirst" number="7">7</numbering>
<numbering type="pageLast" number="66">66</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<correspondenceTo>DA McNeil, Decision Support Research Team, Child and Women's Health Calgary Health Region, Calgary, Canada. E‐mail:
<email>Debbie.McNeil@CalgaryHealthRegion.ca</email>
</correspondenceTo>
<objectNameGroup>
<objectName elementName="appendix">Appendix</objectName>
</objectNameGroup>
<linkGroup>
<link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:OBR.OBR242.pdf"></link>
</linkGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<contentMeta>
<unparsedEditorialHistory>Received 5 May 2005; revised 13 September 2005; accepted 28 September 2005</unparsedEditorialHistory>
<countGroup>
<count type="figureTotal" number="2"></count>
<count type="tableTotal" number="23"></count>
<count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count>
<count type="referenceTotal" number="334"></count>
<count type="wordTotal" number="23410"></count>
<count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count>
<count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup>
<title type="main">Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with ‘best practice’ recommendations</title>
<title type="shortAuthors">
<i>M. A. T. Flynn</i>
et al.</title>
<title type="short">Reducing obesity in children/a synthesis</title>
</titleGroup>
<creators>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1 #a2 #a3" noteRef="#fn1">
<personName>
<givenNames>M. A. T.</givenNames>
<familyName>Flynn</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a4 #a5" corresponding="yes">
<personName>
<givenNames>D. A.</givenNames>
<familyName>McNeil</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a6">
<personName>
<givenNames>B.</givenNames>
<familyName>Maloff</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a4 #a5">
<personName>
<givenNames>D.</givenNames>
<familyName>Mutasingwa</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a4">
<personName>
<givenNames>M.</givenNames>
<familyName>Wu</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr6" affiliationRef="#a4 #a5">
<personName>
<givenNames>C.</givenNames>
<familyName>Ford</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr7" affiliationRef="#a4 #a7">
<personName>
<givenNames>S. C.</givenNames>
<familyName>Tough</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
</creators>
<affiliationGroup>
<affiliation xml:id="a1">
<unparsedAffiliation>Nutrition and Active Living, Healthy Living, Calgary Health Region</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation xml:id="a2">
<unparsedAffiliation>Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation xml:id="a3">
<unparsedAffiliation>Department of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Alberta</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation xml:id="a4">
<unparsedAffiliation>Decision Support Research Team, Child and Women's Health Calgary Health Region</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation xml:id="a5">
<unparsedAffiliation>Graduate Student Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation xml:id="a6">
<unparsedAffiliation>Community Development, Healthy Living Calgary Health Region</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
<affiliation xml:id="a7" countryCode="CA">
<unparsedAffiliation>Departments of Paediatrics and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
</affiliationGroup>
<keywordGroup xml:lang="en">
<keyword xml:id="k1">Child</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k2">obesity</keyword>
<keyword xml:id="k3">synthesis research</keyword>
</keywordGroup>
<abstractGroup>
<abstract type="main" xml:lang="en">
<title type="main">Summary</title>
<p>Childhood obesity is a global epidemic and rising trends in overweight and obesity are apparent in both developed and developing countries. Available estimates for the period between the 1980s and 1990s show the prevalence of overweight and obesity in children increased by a magnitude of two to five times in developed countries (e.g. from 11% to over 30% in boys in Canada), and up to almost four times in developing countries (e.g. from 4% to 14% in Brazil). The goal of this synthesis research study was to develop best practice recommendations based on a systematic approach to finding, selecting and critically appraising programmes addressing prevention and treatment of childhood obesity and related risk of chronic diseases.</p>
<p> An international panel of experts in areas of relevance to obesity provided guidance for the study. This synthesis research encompassed a comprehensive search of medical/academic and grey literature and the Internet covering the years 1982–2003. The appraisal approach developed to identify best practice was unique, in that it considered not only methodological rigour, but also population health, immigrant health and programme development/evaluation perspectives in the assessment. Scores were generated based on pre‐determined criteria with programmes scoring in the top tertile of the scoring range in any one of the four appraisal categories included for further examination. The synthesis process included identification of gaps and an analysis and summary of programme development and programme effectiveness to enable conclusions to be drawn and recommendations to be made.</p>
<p> The results from the library database searches (13 158 hits), the Internet search and key informant surveys were reduced to a review of 982 reports of which 500 were selected for critical appraisal. In total 158 articles, representing 147 programmes, were included for further analysis. The majority of reports were included based on high appraisal scores in programme development and evaluation with limited numbers eligible based on scores in other categories of appraisal. While no single programme emerged as a model of best practice, synthesis of included programmes provided rich information on elements that represent innovative rather than best practice under particular circumstances that are dynamic (changing according to population subgroups, age, ethnicity, setting, leadership, etc.). Thus the findings of this synthesis review identifies areas for action, opportunities for programme development and research priorities to inform the development of best practice recommendations that will reduce obesity and chronic disease risk in children and youth.</p>
<p> A lack of programming to address the particular needs of subgroups of children and youth emerged in this review. Although immigrants new to developed countries may be more vulnerable to the obesogenic environment, no programmes were identified that specifically targeted their potentially specialized needs (e.g. different food supply in a new country). Children 0–6 years of age and males represented other population subgroups where obesity prevention programmes and evidence of effectiveness were limited. These gaps are of concern because (i) the pre‐school years may be a critical period for obesity prevention as indicated by the association of the adiposity rebound and obesity in later years; and (ii) although the growing prevalence of obesity affects males and females equally; males may be more vulnerable to associated health risks such as cardiovascular disease. Other gaps in knowledge identified during synthesis include a limited number of interventions in home and community settings and a lack of upstream population‐based interventions. The shortage of programmes in community and home settings limits our understanding of the effectiveness of interventions in these environments, while the lack of upstream investment indicates an opportunity to develop more upstream and population‐focused interventions to balance and extend the current emphasis on individual‐based programmes.</p>
<p> The evidence reviewed indicates that current programmes lead to short‐term improvements in outcomes relating to obesity and chronic disease prevention with no adverse effects noted. This supports the continuation and further development of programmes currently directed at children and youth, as further evidence for best practice accumulates. In this synthesis, schools were found to be a critical setting for programming where health status indicators, such as body composition, chronic disease risk factors and fitness, can all be positively impacted. Engagement in physical activity emerged as a critical intervention in obesity prevention and reduction programmes.</p>
<p> While many programmes in the review had the potential to integrate chronic disease prevention, few did; therefore efforts could be directed towards better integration of chronic disease prevention programmes to minimize duplication and optimize resources. Programmes require sustained long‐term resources to facilitate comprehensive evaluation that will ascertain if long‐term impact such as sustained normal weight is maintained. Furthermore, involving stakeholders in programme design, implementation and evaluation could be crucial to the success of interventions, helping to ensure that needs are met.</p>
<p> A number of methodological issues related to the assessment of obesity intervention and prevention programmes were identified and offer insight into how research protocols can be enhanced to strengthen evidence for obesity interventions. Further research is required to understand the merits of the various forms in which interventions (singly and in combination) are delivered and in which circumstances they are effective. There is a critical need for the development of consistent indicators to ensure that comparisons of programme outcomes can be made to better inform best practice.</p>
</abstract>
</abstractGroup>
</contentMeta>
<noteGroup>
<note xml:id="fn1">
<label>*</label>
<p> Currently at Food Safety Authority of Ireland, Dublin.</p>
</note>
</noteGroup>
</header>
</component>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6">
<titleInfo lang="en">
<title>Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with ‘best practice’ recommendations</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en">
<title>Reducing obesity in children/a synthesis</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en">
<title>Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with ‘best practice’ recommendations</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">M. A. T.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Flynn</namePart>
<affiliation>Nutrition and Active Living, Healthy Living, Calgary Health Region</affiliation>
<affiliation>Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary</affiliation>
<affiliation>Department of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Alberta</affiliation>
<description>Currently at Food Safety Authority of Ireland, Dublin.</description>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">D. A.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">McNeil</namePart>
<affiliation>Decision Support Research Team, Child and Women's Health Calgary Health Region</affiliation>
<affiliation>Graduate Student Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary</affiliation>
<affiliation>E-mail: Debbie.McNeil@CalgaryHealthRegion.ca</affiliation>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">B.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Maloff</namePart>
<affiliation>Community Development, Healthy Living Calgary Health Region</affiliation>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">D.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Mutasingwa</namePart>
<affiliation>Decision Support Research Team, Child and Women's Health Calgary Health Region</affiliation>
<affiliation>Graduate Student Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary</affiliation>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">M.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Wu</namePart>
<affiliation>Decision Support Research Team, Child and Women's Health Calgary Health Region</affiliation>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">C.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Ford</namePart>
<affiliation>Decision Support Research Team, Child and Women's Health Calgary Health Region</affiliation>
<affiliation>Graduate Student Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary</affiliation>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">S. C.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Tough</namePart>
<affiliation>Decision Support Research Team, Child and Women's Health Calgary Health Region</affiliation>
<affiliation>Departments of Paediatrics and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada</affiliation>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="review-article" displayLabel="reviewArticle"></genre>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm>
</place>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2006-02</dateIssued>
<edition>Received 5 May 2005; revised 13 September 2005; accepted 28 September 2005</edition>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2006</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType>
<extent unit="figures">2</extent>
<extent unit="tables">23</extent>
<extent unit="references">334</extent>
<extent unit="words">23410</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract lang="en">Childhood obesity is a global epidemic and rising trends in overweight and obesity are apparent in both developed and developing countries. Available estimates for the period between the 1980s and 1990s show the prevalence of overweight and obesity in children increased by a magnitude of two to five times in developed countries (e.g. from 11% to over 30% in boys in Canada), and up to almost four times in developing countries (e.g. from 4% to 14% in Brazil). The goal of this synthesis research study was to develop best practice recommendations based on a systematic approach to finding, selecting and critically appraising programmes addressing prevention and treatment of childhood obesity and related risk of chronic diseases.  An international panel of experts in areas of relevance to obesity provided guidance for the study. This synthesis research encompassed a comprehensive search of medical/academic and grey literature and the Internet covering the years 1982–2003. The appraisal approach developed to identify best practice was unique, in that it considered not only methodological rigour, but also population health, immigrant health and programme development/evaluation perspectives in the assessment. Scores were generated based on pre‐determined criteria with programmes scoring in the top tertile of the scoring range in any one of the four appraisal categories included for further examination. The synthesis process included identification of gaps and an analysis and summary of programme development and programme effectiveness to enable conclusions to be drawn and recommendations to be made.  The results from the library database searches (13 158 hits), the Internet search and key informant surveys were reduced to a review of 982 reports of which 500 were selected for critical appraisal. In total 158 articles, representing 147 programmes, were included for further analysis. The majority of reports were included based on high appraisal scores in programme development and evaluation with limited numbers eligible based on scores in other categories of appraisal. While no single programme emerged as a model of best practice, synthesis of included programmes provided rich information on elements that represent innovative rather than best practice under particular circumstances that are dynamic (changing according to population subgroups, age, ethnicity, setting, leadership, etc.). Thus the findings of this synthesis review identifies areas for action, opportunities for programme development and research priorities to inform the development of best practice recommendations that will reduce obesity and chronic disease risk in children and youth.  A lack of programming to address the particular needs of subgroups of children and youth emerged in this review. Although immigrants new to developed countries may be more vulnerable to the obesogenic environment, no programmes were identified that specifically targeted their potentially specialized needs (e.g. different food supply in a new country). Children 0–6 years of age and males represented other population subgroups where obesity prevention programmes and evidence of effectiveness were limited. These gaps are of concern because (i) the pre‐school years may be a critical period for obesity prevention as indicated by the association of the adiposity rebound and obesity in later years; and (ii) although the growing prevalence of obesity affects males and females equally; males may be more vulnerable to associated health risks such as cardiovascular disease. Other gaps in knowledge identified during synthesis include a limited number of interventions in home and community settings and a lack of upstream population‐based interventions. The shortage of programmes in community and home settings limits our understanding of the effectiveness of interventions in these environments, while the lack of upstream investment indicates an opportunity to develop more upstream and population‐focused interventions to balance and extend the current emphasis on individual‐based programmes.  The evidence reviewed indicates that current programmes lead to short‐term improvements in outcomes relating to obesity and chronic disease prevention with no adverse effects noted. This supports the continuation and further development of programmes currently directed at children and youth, as further evidence for best practice accumulates. In this synthesis, schools were found to be a critical setting for programming where health status indicators, such as body composition, chronic disease risk factors and fitness, can all be positively impacted. Engagement in physical activity emerged as a critical intervention in obesity prevention and reduction programmes.  While many programmes in the review had the potential to integrate chronic disease prevention, few did; therefore efforts could be directed towards better integration of chronic disease prevention programmes to minimize duplication and optimize resources. Programmes require sustained long‐term resources to facilitate comprehensive evaluation that will ascertain if long‐term impact such as sustained normal weight is maintained. Furthermore, involving stakeholders in programme design, implementation and evaluation could be crucial to the success of interventions, helping to ensure that needs are met.  A number of methodological issues related to the assessment of obesity intervention and prevention programmes were identified and offer insight into how research protocols can be enhanced to strengthen evidence for obesity interventions. Further research is required to understand the merits of the various forms in which interventions (singly and in combination) are delivered and in which circumstances they are effective. There is a critical need for the development of consistent indicators to ensure that comparisons of programme outcomes can be made to better inform best practice.</abstract>
<subject lang="en">
<genre>keywords</genre>
<topic>Child</topic>
<topic>obesity</topic>
<topic>synthesis research</topic>
</subject>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Obesity Reviews</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal">journal</genre>
<identifier type="ISSN">1467-7881</identifier>
<identifier type="eISSN">1467-789X</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-789X</identifier>
<identifier type="PublisherID">OBR</identifier>
<part>
<date>2006</date>
<detail type="volume">
<caption>vol.</caption>
<number>7</number>
</detail>
<detail type="supplement">
<caption>Suppl. no.</caption>
<number>s1</number>
</detail>
<extent unit="pages">
<start>7</start>
<end>66</end>
<total>60</total>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">43AFC8EC3AAF2E1AF27810920FFCC44E24FB6BF0</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00242.x</identifier>
<identifier type="ArticleID">OBR242</identifier>
<recordInfo>
<recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource>
<recordOrigin>Blackwell Science Ltd</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
</metadata>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Psychologie/explor/TherFamFrancoV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001B40 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001B40 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Psychologie
   |area=    TherFamFrancoV1
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:43AFC8EC3AAF2E1AF27810920FFCC44E24FB6BF0
   |texte=   Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with ‘best practice’ recommendations
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.29.
Data generation: Tue May 16 11:23:40 2017. Site generation: Mon Feb 12 23:51:41 2024