Synchrony in the Triad: A Microlevel Process Model of Coparenting and Parent‐Child Interactions
Identifieur interne : 001927 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001926; suivant : 001928Synchrony in the Triad: A Microlevel Process Model of Coparenting and Parent‐Child Interactions
Auteurs : Ilanit Gordon ; Ruth FeldmanSource :
- Family Process [ 0014-7370 ] ; 2008-12.
English descriptors
Abstract
Guided by a microanalytic approach to the study of relationships, we assessed parent, infant, and coparental behaviors during triadic interactions in 94 parents and their 5‐month‐old firstborn child. Relational behaviors in each family subsystem—mother‐infant, father‐infant, and coparenting—were microcoded. Marital satisfaction and infant temperament were self‐reported. No differences were found in the infants' behavior toward mother and father or in the time spent with each parent. Mothers' and fathers' relational behavior during parent‐infant episodes were generally comparable, yet mothers vocalized more and the latency to father's displaying positive affect was longer. Conditional probabilities indicated that under conditions of coparental mutuality, fathers showed more positive behaviors than mothers. Lag‐sequential analysis demonstrated that change in the infant's social focus between parents followed change in coparental behavior. Fathers' coparental mutuality was independently predicted by maternal behavior during mother‐child episodes, father marital satisfaction, and infant difficult temperament, whereas mothers' coparental mutuality was only linked with fathers' relational behavior. Results highlight the importance of including a microlevel perspective on the family system at the first stages of family development.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2008.00266.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:F27480751A5786485E4A107F07C381BB8E292F67Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Synchrony in the Triad: A Microlevel Process Model of Coparenting and Parent‐Child Interactions</title><author><name sortKey="Gordon, Ilanit" sort="Gordon, Ilanit" uniqKey="Gordon I" first="Ilanit" last="Gordon">Ilanit Gordon</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, Bar‐Ilan University, Ramat‐Gam, Israel</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Feldman, Ruth" sort="Feldman, Ruth" uniqKey="Feldman R" first="Ruth" last="Feldman">Ruth Feldman</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, Bar‐Ilan University, Ramat‐Gam, Israel</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:F27480751A5786485E4A107F07C381BB8E292F67</idno><date when="2008" year="2008">2008</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1545-5300.2008.00266.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/F27480751A5786485E4A107F07C381BB8E292F67/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001927</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001927</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Synchrony in the Triad: A Microlevel Process Model of Coparenting and Parent‐Child Interactions</title><author><name sortKey="Gordon, Ilanit" sort="Gordon, Ilanit" uniqKey="Gordon I" first="Ilanit" last="Gordon">Ilanit Gordon</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, Bar‐Ilan University, Ramat‐Gam, Israel</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Feldman, Ruth" sort="Feldman, Ruth" uniqKey="Feldman R" first="Ruth" last="Feldman">Ruth Feldman</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Psychology, Bar‐Ilan University, Ramat‐Gam, Israel</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Family Process</title><idno type="ISSN">0014-7370</idno><idno type="eISSN">1545-5300</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2008-12">2008-12</date><biblScope unit="volume">47</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="465">465</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="479">479</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0014-7370</idno></series><idno type="istex">F27480751A5786485E4A107F07C381BB8E292F67</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1545-5300.2008.00266.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">FAMP266</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0014-7370</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Caparenting</term><term>Family intractions</term><term>Microanalysis</term><term>Synchrony</term><term>Transition to parenthood</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Guided by a microanalytic approach to the study of relationships, we assessed parent, infant, and coparental behaviors during triadic interactions in 94 parents and their 5‐month‐old firstborn child. Relational behaviors in each family subsystem—mother‐infant, father‐infant, and coparenting—were microcoded. Marital satisfaction and infant temperament were self‐reported. No differences were found in the infants' behavior toward mother and father or in the time spent with each parent. Mothers' and fathers' relational behavior during parent‐infant episodes were generally comparable, yet mothers vocalized more and the latency to father's displaying positive affect was longer. Conditional probabilities indicated that under conditions of coparental mutuality, fathers showed more positive behaviors than mothers. Lag‐sequential analysis demonstrated that change in the infant's social focus between parents followed change in coparental behavior. Fathers' coparental mutuality was independently predicted by maternal behavior during mother‐child episodes, father marital satisfaction, and infant difficult temperament, whereas mothers' coparental mutuality was only linked with fathers' relational behavior. Results highlight the importance of including a microlevel perspective on the family system at the first stages of family development.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>ILANIT GORDON MA</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Psychology, Bar‐Ilan University, Ramat‐Gam, Israel</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>RUTH FELDMAN PH. D</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Psychology, Bar‐Ilan University, Ramat‐Gam, Israel</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Transition to parenthood</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Microanalysis</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Caparenting</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Family intractions</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Synchrony</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>FAMP266</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Guided by a microanalytic approach to the study of relationships, we assessed parent, infant, and coparental behaviors during triadic interactions in 94 parents and their 5‐month‐old firstborn child. Relational behaviors in each family subsystem—mother‐infant, father‐infant, and coparenting—were microcoded. Marital satisfaction and infant temperament were self‐reported. No differences were found in the infants' behavior toward mother and father or in the time spent with each parent. Mothers' and fathers' relational behavior during parent‐infant episodes were generally comparable, yet mothers vocalized more and the latency to father's displaying positive affect was longer. Conditional probabilities indicated that under conditions of coparental mutuality, fathers showed more positive behaviors than mothers. Lag‐sequential analysis demonstrated that change in the infant's social focus between parents followed change in coparental behavior. Fathers' coparental mutuality was independently predicted by maternal behavior during mother‐child episodes, father marital satisfaction, and infant difficult temperament, whereas mothers' coparental mutuality was only linked with fathers' relational behavior. Results highlight the importance of including a microlevel perspective on the family system at the first stages of family development.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.076</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>485.972 x 720 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>1346</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>6119</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>40034</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>15</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>173</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Synchrony in the Triad: A Microlevel Process Model of Coparenting and Parent‐Child Interactions</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>47</volume><publisherId><json:string>FAMP</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>15</total><last>479</last><first>465</first></pages><issn><json:string>0014-7370</json:string></issn><issue>4</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1545-5300</json:string></eissn><title>Family Process</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1545-5300</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>social science</json:string><json:string>psychology, clinical</json:string><json:string>family studies</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>economic & social sciences</json:string><json:string>social sciences</json:string><json:string>family studies</json:string></scienceMetrix><inist><json:string>sciences humaines et sociales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>2008</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2008</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1545-5300.2008.00266.x</json:string></doi><id>F27480751A5786485E4A107F07C381BB8E292F67</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F27480751A5786485E4A107F07C381BB8E292F67/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F27480751A5786485E4A107F07C381BB8E292F67/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/F27480751A5786485E4A107F07C381BB8E292F67/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Synchrony in the Triad: A Microlevel Process Model of Coparenting and Parent‐Child Interactions</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace><availability><p>2008 © FPI, Inc.</p></availability><date>2008</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Synchrony in the Triad: A Microlevel Process Model of Coparenting and Parent‐Child Interactions</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">ILANIT</forename><surname>GORDON</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">MA</roleName><affiliation>Department of Psychology, Bar‐Ilan University, Ramat‐Gam, Israel</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">RUTH</forename><surname>FELDMAN</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">PH. D</roleName><affiliation>Department of Psychology, Bar‐Ilan University, Ramat‐Gam, Israel</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Family Process</title><idno type="pISSN">0014-7370</idno><idno type="eISSN">1545-5300</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1545-5300</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2008-12"></date><biblScope unit="volume">47</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="465">465</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="479">479</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">F27480751A5786485E4A107F07C381BB8E292F67</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1545-5300.2008.00266.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">FAMP266</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2008</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Guided by a microanalytic approach to the study of relationships, we assessed parent, infant, and coparental behaviors during triadic interactions in 94 parents and their 5‐month‐old firstborn child. Relational behaviors in each family subsystem—mother‐infant, father‐infant, and coparenting—were microcoded. Marital satisfaction and infant temperament were self‐reported. No differences were found in the infants' behavior toward mother and father or in the time spent with each parent. Mothers' and fathers' relational behavior during parent‐infant episodes were generally comparable, yet mothers vocalized more and the latency to father's displaying positive affect was longer. Conditional probabilities indicated that under conditions of coparental mutuality, fathers showed more positive behaviors than mothers. Lag‐sequential analysis demonstrated that change in the infant's social focus between parents followed change in coparental behavior. Fathers' coparental mutuality was independently predicted by maternal behavior during mother‐child episodes, father marital satisfaction, and infant difficult temperament, whereas mothers' coparental mutuality was only linked with fathers' relational behavior. Results highlight the importance of including a microlevel perspective on the family system at the first stages of family development.</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="fr"><p>Guiado por un enfoque microanalítico del estudio de relaciones, evaluamos los comportamientos de los padres por separado, el del niño y el de los padres juntos durante interacciones triádicas en 94 parejas y sus primogénitos de 5 meses de edad. Las conductas relacionales en cada subsistema familiar (madre‐hijo, padre‐hijo, padre‐madre) fueron micro‐codificadas. La satisfacción marital y el carácter del niño fueron autoinformados. No se encontraron diferencias entre el comportamiento del niño con su padre y con su madre ni en el tiempo que pasó con cada uno de ellos. Las conductas relacionales de los padres y las madres durante los episodios padre/madre‐hijo fueron, en general, comparables, aunque las madres se expresaban más hablando, y la demora de los padres en mostrar afecto positivo fue más larga. Las probabilidades condicionadas indicaron que bajo condiciones de mutualidad coparental los padres mostraron conductas más positivas que las madres. Los análisis de intervalos secuenciales demostraron que el cambio de foco social del niño entre el padre y la madre venía precedido de un cambio en la conducta coparental. La mutualidad coparental de los padres se veía pronosticada de modo independiente por la conducta materna durante los episodios madre‐hijo, la satisfacción de los padres con el matrimonio, y el carácter difícil de los niños, mientras que la mutualidad coparental de las madres sólo se vió asociada a la conducta relacional de los padres. Los resultados destacan la importancia de incluir una perspectiva de micro‐nivel en el sistema familiar durante las primeras fases del desarrollo de la familia.
Palabras clave: transición a la paternidad, microanálisis, coparentalidad, interacciones familares, sincronía</p></abstract><abstract xml:lang="zh"><p></p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>keywords</head><item><term>Transition to parenthood</term></item><item><term>Microanalysis</term></item><item><term>Caparenting</term></item><item><term>Family intractions</term></item><item><term>Synchrony</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2008-12">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F27480751A5786485E4A107F07C381BB8E292F67/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisherName><publisherLoc>Malden, USA</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1545-5300</doi><issn type="print">0014-7370</issn><issn type="electronic">1545-5300</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="FAMP"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="FAMILY PROCESS">Family Process</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="12004"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/famp.2008.47.issue-4</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="47">47</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="4">4</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2008-12">December 2008</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="5" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1545-5300.2008.00266.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="FAMP266"></id><id type="supplier" value="266"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="15"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">SPECIAL SECTION: THE POWER OF TRIADIC PROCESSES AMONG INFANTS AND THEIR PARENTS</title></titleGroup><copyright>2008 © FPI, Inc.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2008-11-24"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2008-11-24"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.12 mode:FullText" date="2010-07-13"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-25"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="465">465</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="479">479</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo> concerning this article should be addressed to Ruth Feldman, Department of Psychology, Bar‐Ilan University, Ramat‐Gam, 52900 Israel. E‐mail: <email normalForm="Feldman@mail.biu.ac.il">Feldman@mail.biu.ac.il</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:FAMP.FAMP266.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="1"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="3"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="46"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="7662"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="56"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Synchrony in the Triad: A Microlevel Process Model of Coparenting and Parent‐Child Interactions</title><title type="shortAuthors">GORDON & FELDMAN</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>ILANIT</givenNames><familyName>GORDON</familyName><degrees>MA</degrees></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>RUTH</givenNames><familyName>FELDMAN</familyName><degrees>PH. D</degrees></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="IL"><unparsedAffiliation>Department of Psychology, Bar‐Ilan University, Ramat‐Gam, Israel</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">Transition to parenthood</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">Microanalysis</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">Caparenting</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">Family intractions</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">Synchrony</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>Guided by a microanalytic approach to the study of relationships, we assessed parent, infant, and coparental behaviors during triadic interactions in 94 parents and their 5‐month‐old firstborn child. Relational behaviors in each family subsystem—mother‐infant, father‐infant, and coparenting—were microcoded. Marital satisfaction and infant temperament were self‐reported. No differences were found in the infants' behavior toward mother and father or in the time spent with each parent. Mothers' and fathers' relational behavior during parent‐infant episodes were generally comparable, yet mothers vocalized more and the latency to father's displaying positive affect was longer. Conditional probabilities indicated that under conditions of coparental mutuality, fathers showed more positive behaviors than mothers. Lag‐sequential analysis demonstrated that change in the infant's social focus between parents followed change in coparental behavior. Fathers' coparental mutuality was independently predicted by maternal behavior during mother‐child episodes, father marital satisfaction, and infant difficult temperament, whereas mothers' coparental mutuality was only linked with fathers' relational behavior. Results highlight the importance of including a microlevel perspective on the family system at the first stages of family development.</p></abstract><abstract type="main" xml:lang="fr"><title type="main">RESUMEN</title><p>Guiado por un enfoque microanalítico del estudio de relaciones, evaluamos los comportamientos de los padres por separado, el del niño y el de los padres juntos durante interacciones triádicas en 94 parejas y sus primogénitos de 5 meses de edad. Las conductas relacionales en cada subsistema familiar (madre‐hijo, padre‐hijo, padre‐madre) fueron micro‐codificadas. La satisfacción marital y el carácter del niño fueron autoinformados. No se encontraron diferencias entre el comportamiento del niño con su padre y con su madre ni en el tiempo que pasó con cada uno de ellos. Las conductas relacionales de los padres y las madres durante los episodios padre/madre‐hijo fueron, en general, comparables, aunque las madres se expresaban más hablando, y la demora de los padres en mostrar afecto positivo fue más larga. Las probabilidades condicionadas indicaron que bajo condiciones de mutualidad coparental los padres mostraron conductas más positivas que las madres. Los análisis de intervalos secuenciales demostraron que el cambio de foco social del niño entre el padre y la madre venía precedido de un cambio en la conducta coparental. La mutualidad coparental de los padres se veía pronosticada de modo independiente por la conducta materna durante los episodios madre‐hijo, la satisfacción de los padres con el matrimonio, y el carácter difícil de los niños, mientras que la mutualidad coparental de las madres sólo se vió asociada a la conducta relacional de los padres. Los resultados destacan la importancia de incluir una perspectiva de micro‐nivel en el sistema familiar durante las primeras fases del desarrollo de la familia.
Palabras clave: transición a la paternidad, microanálisis, coparentalidad, interacciones familares, sincronía</p></abstract><abstract type="main" xml:lang="zh"><p> <displayedItem type="mathematics" xml:id="mu2" numbered="no"><mediaResourceGroup><mediaResource alt="image" href="urn:x-wiley:00147370:media:FAMP266:FAMP_266_mu2"></mediaResource><mediaResource alt="image" mimeType="image/gif" rendition="webOriginal" href=""></mediaResource></mediaResourceGroup></displayedItem> </p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta><noteGroup><note xml:id="fn1" numbered="no"><p>Research at Dr. Feldman's Lab is supported by the US‐Israel Bi‐National Sciences Foundation (#2005–273). The NARSAD foundation, and the Israel Science Foundation (#1318/08).</p></note></noteGroup></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Synchrony in the Triad: A Microlevel Process Model of Coparenting and Parent‐Child Interactions</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Synchrony in the Triad: A Microlevel Process Model of Coparenting and Parent‐Child Interactions</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">ILANIT</namePart><namePart type="family">GORDON</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">MA</namePart><affiliation>Department of Psychology, Bar‐Ilan University, Ramat‐Gam, Israel</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">RUTH</namePart><namePart type="family">FELDMAN</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">PH. D</namePart><affiliation>Department of Psychology, Bar‐Ilan University, Ramat‐Gam, Israel</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Malden, USA</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2008-12</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2008</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="figures">1</extent><extent unit="tables">3</extent><extent unit="references">46</extent><extent unit="words">7662</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Guided by a microanalytic approach to the study of relationships, we assessed parent, infant, and coparental behaviors during triadic interactions in 94 parents and their 5‐month‐old firstborn child. Relational behaviors in each family subsystem—mother‐infant, father‐infant, and coparenting—were microcoded. Marital satisfaction and infant temperament were self‐reported. No differences were found in the infants' behavior toward mother and father or in the time spent with each parent. Mothers' and fathers' relational behavior during parent‐infant episodes were generally comparable, yet mothers vocalized more and the latency to father's displaying positive affect was longer. Conditional probabilities indicated that under conditions of coparental mutuality, fathers showed more positive behaviors than mothers. Lag‐sequential analysis demonstrated that change in the infant's social focus between parents followed change in coparental behavior. Fathers' coparental mutuality was independently predicted by maternal behavior during mother‐child episodes, father marital satisfaction, and infant difficult temperament, whereas mothers' coparental mutuality was only linked with fathers' relational behavior. Results highlight the importance of including a microlevel perspective on the family system at the first stages of family development.</abstract><abstract lang="fr">Guiado por un enfoque microanalítico del estudio de relaciones, evaluamos los comportamientos de los padres por separado, el del niño y el de los padres juntos durante interacciones triádicas en 94 parejas y sus primogénitos de 5 meses de edad. Las conductas relacionales en cada subsistema familiar (madre‐hijo, padre‐hijo, padre‐madre) fueron micro‐codificadas. La satisfacción marital y el carácter del niño fueron autoinformados. No se encontraron diferencias entre el comportamiento del niño con su padre y con su madre ni en el tiempo que pasó con cada uno de ellos. Las conductas relacionales de los padres y las madres durante los episodios padre/madre‐hijo fueron, en general, comparables, aunque las madres se expresaban más hablando, y la demora de los padres en mostrar afecto positivo fue más larga. Las probabilidades condicionadas indicaron que bajo condiciones de mutualidad coparental los padres mostraron conductas más positivas que las madres. Los análisis de intervalos secuenciales demostraron que el cambio de foco social del niño entre el padre y la madre venía precedido de un cambio en la conducta coparental. La mutualidad coparental de los padres se veía pronosticada de modo independiente por la conducta materna durante los episodios madre‐hijo, la satisfacción de los padres con el matrimonio, y el carácter difícil de los niños, mientras que la mutualidad coparental de las madres sólo se vió asociada a la conducta relacional de los padres. Los resultados destacan la importancia de incluir una perspectiva de micro‐nivel en el sistema familiar durante las primeras fases del desarrollo de la familia.
Palabras clave: transición a la paternidad, microanálisis, coparentalidad, interacciones familares, sincronía</abstract><abstract lang="zh"></abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>Transition to parenthood</topic><topic>Microanalysis</topic><topic>Caparenting</topic><topic>Family intractions</topic><topic>Synchrony</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Family Process</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0014-7370</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1545-5300</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1545-5300</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">FAMP</identifier><part><date>2008</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>47</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>4</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>465</start><end>479</end><total>15</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">F27480751A5786485E4A107F07C381BB8E292F67</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1545-5300.2008.00266.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">FAMP266</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">2008 © FPI, Inc.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Inc</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Psychologie/explor/TherFamFrancoV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001927 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001927 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Psychologie
|area= TherFamFrancoV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:F27480751A5786485E4A107F07C381BB8E292F67
|texte= Synchrony in the Triad: A Microlevel Process Model of Coparenting and Parent‐Child Interactions
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.29. |  |