Annual Research Review: What is resilience within the social ecology of human development?
Identifieur interne : 001257 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001256; suivant : 001258Annual Research Review: What is resilience within the social ecology of human development?
Auteurs : Michael Ungar ; Mehdi Ghazinour ; Jörg RichterSource :
- Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry [ 0021-9630 ] ; 2013-04.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Background: The development of Bronfenbrenner’s bio‐social‐ecological systems model of human development parallels advances made to the theory of resilience that progressively moved from a more individual (micro) focus on traits to a multisystemic understanding of person–environment reciprocal processes.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.12025
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:F7DEEED9740A8027A6E6EA4C6E3806C1F2C6C580Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Annual Research Review: What is resilience within the social ecology of human development?</title><author><name sortKey="Ungar, Michael" sort="Ungar, Michael" uniqKey="Ungar M" first="Michael" last="Ungar">Michael Ungar</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ghazinour, Mehdi" sort="Ghazinour, Mehdi" uniqKey="Ghazinour M" first="Mehdi" last="Ghazinour">Mehdi Ghazinour</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Umeå‐Sweden, Umea, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Richter, Jorg" sort="Richter, Jorg" uniqKey="Richter J" first="Jörg" last="Richter">Jörg Richter</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:F7DEEED9740A8027A6E6EA4C6E3806C1F2C6C580</idno><date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/jcpp.12025</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/F7DEEED9740A8027A6E6EA4C6E3806C1F2C6C580/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001257</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001257</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Annual Research Review: What is resilience within the social ecology of human development?</title><author><name sortKey="Ungar, Michael" sort="Ungar, Michael" uniqKey="Ungar M" first="Michael" last="Ungar">Michael Ungar</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ghazinour, Mehdi" sort="Ghazinour, Mehdi" uniqKey="Ghazinour M" first="Mehdi" last="Ghazinour">Mehdi Ghazinour</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Umeå‐Sweden, Umea, Sweden</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Richter, Jorg" sort="Richter, Jorg" uniqKey="Richter J" first="Jörg" last="Richter">Jörg Richter</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry</title><idno type="ISSN">0021-9630</idno><idno type="eISSN">1469-7610</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2013-04">2013-04</date><biblScope unit="volume">54</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="348">348</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="366">366</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0021-9630</idno></series><idno type="istex">F7DEEED9740A8027A6E6EA4C6E3806C1F2C6C580</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/jcpp.12025</idno><idno type="ArticleID">JCPP12025</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0021-9630</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Resilience</term><term>adversity</term><term>context</term><term>culture</term><term>differential impact</term><term>equifinality</term><term>human ecology</term><term>multisystemic</term><term>positive development</term><term>risk</term><term>social ecology</term><term>stress</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Background: The development of Bronfenbrenner’s bio‐social‐ecological systems model of human development parallels advances made to the theory of resilience that progressively moved from a more individual (micro) focus on traits to a multisystemic understanding of person–environment reciprocal processes.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Michael Ungar</name><affiliations><json:string>Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Mehdi Ghazinour</name><affiliations><json:string>Umeå‐Sweden, Umea, Sweden</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Jörg Richter</name><affiliations><json:string>University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Resilience</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>social ecology</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>human ecology</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>multisystemic</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>positive development</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>stress</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>adversity</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>risk</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>equifinality</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>differential impact</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>culture</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>context</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>JCPP12025</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>reviewArticle</json:string></originalGenre><qualityIndicators><score>5.456</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>595.276 x 850.394 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>306</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>14682</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>99394</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>19</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>38</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Annual Research Review: What is resilience within the social ecology of human development?</title><genre><json:string>review-article</json:string></genre><host><volume>54</volume><publisherId><json:string>JCPP</json:string></publisherId><pages><last>366</last><first>348</first></pages><issn><json:string>0021-9630</json:string></issn><issue>4</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1469-7610</json:string></eissn><title>Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1469-7610</json:string></doi></host><categories><wos><json:string>social science</json:string><json:string>psychology, developmental</json:string><json:string>psychiatry</json:string><json:string>science</json:string><json:string>psychology</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>health sciences</json:string><json:string>psychology & cognitive sciences</json:string><json:string>developmental & child psychology</json:string></scienceMetrix></categories><publicationDate>2013</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2013</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/jcpp.12025</json:string></doi><id>F7DEEED9740A8027A6E6EA4C6E3806C1F2C6C580</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F7DEEED9740A8027A6E6EA4C6E3806C1F2C6C580/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F7DEEED9740A8027A6E6EA4C6E3806C1F2C6C580/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/F7DEEED9740A8027A6E6EA4C6E3806C1F2C6C580/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Annual Research Review: What is resilience within the social ecology of human development?</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry © 2012 Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health.</p></availability><date>2013</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Annual Research Review: What is resilience within the social ecology of human development?</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Michael</forename><surname>Ungar</surname></persName><affiliation>Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Mehdi</forename><surname>Ghazinour</surname></persName><affiliation>Umeå‐Sweden, Umea, Sweden</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-3"><persName><forename type="first">Jörg</forename><surname>Richter</surname></persName><affiliation>University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry</title><idno type="pISSN">0021-9630</idno><idno type="eISSN">1469-7610</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1469-7610</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2013-04"></date><biblScope unit="volume">54</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="348">348</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="366">366</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">F7DEEED9740A8027A6E6EA4C6E3806C1F2C6C580</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/jcpp.12025</idno><idno type="ArticleID">JCPP12025</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2013</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract><p>Background: The development of Bronfenbrenner’s bio‐social‐ecological systems model of human development parallels advances made to the theory of resilience that progressively moved from a more individual (micro) focus on traits to a multisystemic understanding of person–environment reciprocal processes.</p></abstract><abstract><p>Methods: This review uses Bronfenbrenner’s model and Ungar’s social‐ecological interpretation of four decades of research on resilience to discuss the results of a purposeful selection of studies of resilience that have been done in different contexts and cultures.</p></abstract><abstract><p>Results: An ecological model of resilience can, and indeed has been shown to help researchers of resilience to conceptualize the child’s social and physical ecologies, from caregivers to neighbourhoods, that account for both proximal and distal factors that predict successful development under adversity. Three principles emerged from this review that inform a bio‐social‐ecological interpretation of resilience: equifinality (there are many proximal processes that can lead to many different, but equally viable, expressions of human development associated with well‐being); differential impact (the nature of the risks children face, their perceptions of the resources available to mitigate those risks and the quality of the resources that are accessible make proximal processes more or less influential to children’s development); and contextual and cultural moderation (different contexts and cultures provide access to different processes associated with resilience as it is defined locally).</p></abstract><abstract><p>Conclusion: As this review shows, using this multisystemic social‐ecological theory of resilience can inform a deeper understanding of the processes that contribute to positive development under stress. It can also offer practitioners and policy makers a broader perspective on principles for the design and implementation of effective interventions.</p></abstract><textClass xml:lang="en"><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>keywords</head><item><term>Resilience</term></item><item><term>social ecology</term></item><item><term>human ecology</term></item><item><term>multisystemic</term></item><item><term>positive development</term></item><item><term>stress</term></item><item><term>adversity</term></item><item><term>risk</term></item><item><term>equifinality</term></item><item><term>differential impact</term></item><item><term>culture</term></item><item><term>context</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2013-04">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F7DEEED9740A8027A6E6EA4C6E3806C1F2C6C580/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1469-7610</doi><issn type="print">0021-9630</issn><issn type="electronic">1469-7610</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="JCPP"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY PSYCHIATRY">Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="04104"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jcpp.2013.54.issue-4</doi><titleGroup><title type="specialIssueTitle">Annual Research Review: Resilience in child development</title></titleGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="54">54</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="4">4</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2013-04">April 2013</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="reviewArticle" position="3" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/jcpp.12025</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="JCPP12025"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">ANNUAL RESEARCH REVIEWS</title></titleGroup><copyright>© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry © 2012 Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:3.2.0 mode:FullText" date="2013-03-13"></event><event agent="SPS" date="2013-03-13" type="xmlCorrected"></event><event type="publishedOnlineEarlyUnpaginated" date="2012-12-07"></event><event type="firstOnline" date="2012-12-07"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2013-03-20"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-30"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.6.4 mode:FullText" date="2015-10-05"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="348">348</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="366">366</numbering></numberingGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:JCPP.JCPP12025.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Annual Research Review: What is resilience within the social ecology of human development?</title><title type="shortAuthors">Michael Ungar, Mehdi Gazinour, and Jörg Richter</title><title type="short">Resilience in the social ecology of human development</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Michael</givenNames><familyName>Ungar</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Mehdi</givenNames><familyName>Ghazinour</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a3"><personName><givenNames>Jörg</givenNames><familyName>Richter</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="CA"><unparsedAffiliation>Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="SE"><unparsedAffiliation>Umeå‐Sweden, Umea, Sweden</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3" countryCode="DE"><unparsedAffiliation>University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><keywordGroup xml:lang="en"><keyword xml:id="k1">Resilience</keyword><keyword xml:id="k2">social ecology</keyword><keyword xml:id="k3">human ecology</keyword><keyword xml:id="k4">multisystemic</keyword><keyword xml:id="k5">positive development</keyword><keyword xml:id="k6">stress</keyword><keyword xml:id="k7">adversity</keyword><keyword xml:id="k8">risk</keyword><keyword xml:id="k9">equifinality</keyword><keyword xml:id="k10">differential impact</keyword><keyword xml:id="k11">culture</keyword><keyword xml:id="k12">context</keyword></keywordGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p><b>Background: </b> The development of Bronfenbrenner’s bio‐social‐ecological systems model of human development parallels advances made to the theory of resilience that progressively moved from a more individual (micro) focus on traits to a multisystemic understanding of person–environment reciprocal processes.</p><p><b>Methods: </b> This review uses Bronfenbrenner’s model and Ungar’s social‐ecological interpretation of four decades of research on resilience to discuss the results of a purposeful selection of studies of resilience that have been done in different contexts and cultures.</p><p><b>Results: </b> An ecological model of resilience can, and indeed has been shown to help researchers of resilience to conceptualize the child’s social and physical ecologies, from caregivers to neighbourhoods, that account for both proximal and distal factors that predict successful development under adversity. Three principles emerged from this review that inform a bio‐social‐ecological interpretation of resilience: equifinality (there are many proximal processes that can lead to many different, but equally viable, expressions of human development associated with well‐being); differential impact (the nature of the risks children face, their perceptions of the resources available to mitigate those risks and the quality of the resources that are accessible make proximal processes more or less influential to children’s development); and contextual and cultural moderation (different contexts and cultures provide access to different processes associated with resilience as it is defined locally).</p><p><b>Conclusion: </b> As this review shows, using this multisystemic social‐ecological theory of resilience can inform a deeper understanding of the processes that contribute to positive development under stress. It can also offer practitioners and policy makers a broader perspective on principles for the design and implementation of effective interventions.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta><noteGroup><note xml:id="fn1"><p>Conflict of interest statement: No conflicts declared.</p></note></noteGroup></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Annual Research Review: What is resilience within the social ecology of human development?</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en"><title>Resilience in the social ecology of human development</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Annual Research Review: What is resilience within the social ecology of human development?</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Michael</namePart><namePart type="family">Ungar</namePart><affiliation>Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Mehdi</namePart><namePart type="family">Ghazinour</namePart><affiliation>Umeå‐Sweden, Umea, Sweden</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Jörg</namePart><namePart type="family">Richter</namePart><affiliation>University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="review-article" displayLabel="reviewArticle"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2013-04</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2013</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract>Background: The development of Bronfenbrenner’s bio‐social‐ecological systems model of human development parallels advances made to the theory of resilience that progressively moved from a more individual (micro) focus on traits to a multisystemic understanding of person–environment reciprocal processes.</abstract><abstract>Methods: This review uses Bronfenbrenner’s model and Ungar’s social‐ecological interpretation of four decades of research on resilience to discuss the results of a purposeful selection of studies of resilience that have been done in different contexts and cultures.</abstract><abstract>Results: An ecological model of resilience can, and indeed has been shown to help researchers of resilience to conceptualize the child’s social and physical ecologies, from caregivers to neighbourhoods, that account for both proximal and distal factors that predict successful development under adversity. Three principles emerged from this review that inform a bio‐social‐ecological interpretation of resilience: equifinality (there are many proximal processes that can lead to many different, but equally viable, expressions of human development associated with well‐being); differential impact (the nature of the risks children face, their perceptions of the resources available to mitigate those risks and the quality of the resources that are accessible make proximal processes more or less influential to children’s development); and contextual and cultural moderation (different contexts and cultures provide access to different processes associated with resilience as it is defined locally).</abstract><abstract>Conclusion: As this review shows, using this multisystemic social‐ecological theory of resilience can inform a deeper understanding of the processes that contribute to positive development under stress. It can also offer practitioners and policy makers a broader perspective on principles for the design and implementation of effective interventions.</abstract><subject lang="en"><genre>keywords</genre><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>social ecology</topic><topic>human ecology</topic><topic>multisystemic</topic><topic>positive development</topic><topic>stress</topic><topic>adversity</topic><topic>risk</topic><topic>equifinality</topic><topic>differential impact</topic><topic>culture</topic><topic>context</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0021-9630</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1469-7610</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1469-7610</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">JCPP</identifier><part><date>2013</date><detail type="title"><title>Annual Research Review: Resilience in child development</title></detail><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>54</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>4</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>348</start><end>366</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">F7DEEED9740A8027A6E6EA4C6E3806C1F2C6C580</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/jcpp.12025</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">JCPP12025</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry © 2012 Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Psychologie/explor/TherFamFrancoV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001257 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001257 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Psychologie
|area= TherFamFrancoV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:F7DEEED9740A8027A6E6EA4C6E3806C1F2C6C580
|texte= Annual Research Review: What is resilience within the social ecology of human development?
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.29. |  |