La thérapie familiale en francophonie (serveur d'exploration)

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Rethinking Empowerment: A Postmodern Reappraisal for Emancipatory Practice

Identifieur interne : 001024 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 001023; suivant : 001025

Rethinking Empowerment: A Postmodern Reappraisal for Emancipatory Practice

Auteurs : Bob Pease

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:E430E0DE6BEC5E94C8D4EB4CFD7FD5968B146F79

Abstract

This article is concerned with the implications of the postmodern challenge to critical theory for the practice of empowerment. How do we conceptualize empowerment from a postmodern perspective? It is argued that the modernist concept of power upon which empowerment rests, can have unintended disempowering effects. By conceptualizing power as a commodity, identities are forced into a powerful–powerless dualism which does not always do justice to diverse experiences. Thus we can sometimes contribute to dominance in spite of our liberatory intentions. It is argued that social workers need to become more aware of the self‐disciplining and self‐regulatory processes involved in professional work to address the social relations of power embedded in professional practices. Foucault's analysis of how marginalized knowledges are affected by dominant cultural practices suggests a redefining of empowerment as the insurrection of subjugated knowledge. The implications of this redefinition for practice is illustrated by reference to work with indigenous people in Australia.

Url:
DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/32.2.135

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:E430E0DE6BEC5E94C8D4EB4CFD7FD5968B146F79

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Rethinking Empowerment: A Postmodern Reappraisal for Emancipatory Practice</title>
<author wicri:is="90%">
<name sortKey="Pease, Bob" sort="Pease, Bob" uniqKey="Pease B" first="Bob" last="Pease">Bob Pease</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>School of Social Work and Planning, RMIT University, PO Box 2476V, Melbourne, Victoria 3001, Australia. E-mail: bob.pease@rmit.edu.au</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:E430E0DE6BEC5E94C8D4EB4CFD7FD5968B146F79</idno>
<date when="2002" year="2002">2002</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1093/bjsw/32.2.135</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/E430E0DE6BEC5E94C8D4EB4CFD7FD5968B146F79/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001024</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001024</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Rethinking Empowerment: A Postmodern Reappraisal for Emancipatory Practice</title>
<author wicri:is="90%">
<name sortKey="Pease, Bob" sort="Pease, Bob" uniqKey="Pease B" first="Bob" last="Pease">Bob Pease</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>School of Social Work and Planning, RMIT University, PO Box 2476V, Melbourne, Victoria 3001, Australia. E-mail: bob.pease@rmit.edu.au</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">British Journal of Social Work</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">Br J Soc Work</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0045-3102</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1468-263X</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher>
<date type="published" when="2002-03-01">2002-03-01</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">32</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="135">135</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="147">147</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0045-3102</idno>
</series>
<idno type="istex">E430E0DE6BEC5E94C8D4EB4CFD7FD5968B146F79</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1093/bjsw/32.2.135</idno>
<idno type="local">320135</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0045-3102</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This article is concerned with the implications of the postmodern challenge to critical theory for the practice of empowerment. How do we conceptualize empowerment from a postmodern perspective? It is argued that the modernist concept of power upon which empowerment rests, can have unintended disempowering effects. By conceptualizing power as a commodity, identities are forced into a powerful–powerless dualism which does not always do justice to diverse experiences. Thus we can sometimes contribute to dominance in spite of our liberatory intentions. It is argued that social workers need to become more aware of the self‐disciplining and self‐regulatory processes involved in professional work to address the social relations of power embedded in professional practices. Foucault's analysis of how marginalized knowledges are affected by dominant cultural practices suggests a redefining of empowerment as the insurrection of subjugated knowledge. The implications of this redefinition for practice is illustrated by reference to work with indigenous people in Australia.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex>
<corpusName>oup</corpusName>
<author>
<json:item>
<name>Bob Pease</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>School of Social Work and Planning, RMIT University, PO Box 2476V, Melbourne, Victoria 3001, Australia. E-mail: bob.pease@rmit.edu.au</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<language>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre>
<json:string>research-article</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>This article is concerned with the implications of the postmodern challenge to critical theory for the practice of empowerment. How do we conceptualize empowerment from a postmodern perspective? It is argued that the modernist concept of power upon which empowerment rests, can have unintended disempowering effects. By conceptualizing power as a commodity, identities are forced into a powerful–powerless dualism which does not always do justice to diverse experiences. Thus we can sometimes contribute to dominance in spite of our liberatory intentions. It is argued that social workers need to become more aware of the self‐disciplining and self‐regulatory processes involved in professional work to address the social relations of power embedded in professional practices. Foucault's analysis of how marginalized knowledges are affected by dominant cultural practices suggests a redefining of empowerment as the insurrection of subjugated knowledge. The implications of this redefinition for practice is illustrated by reference to work with indigenous people in Australia.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators>
<score>8.848</score>
<pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageSize>595 x 842 pts (A4)</pdfPageSize>
<refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative>
<keywordCount>0</keywordCount>
<abstractCharCount>1077</abstractCharCount>
<pdfWordCount>5335</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>32988</pdfCharCount>
<pdfPageCount>13</pdfPageCount>
<abstractWordCount>154</abstractWordCount>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>Rethinking Empowerment: A Postmodern Reappraisal for Emancipatory Practice</title>
<genre>
<json:string>research-article</json:string>
</genre>
<host>
<volume>32</volume>
<publisherId>
<json:string>social</json:string>
</publisherId>
<pages>
<last>147</last>
<first>135</first>
</pages>
<issn>
<json:string>0045-3102</json:string>
</issn>
<issue>2</issue>
<genre>
<json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
<language>
<json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<eissn>
<json:string>1468-263X</json:string>
</eissn>
<title>British Journal of Social Work</title>
</host>
<categories>
<wos>
<json:string>social science</json:string>
<json:string>social work</json:string>
</wos>
<scienceMetrix>
<json:string>economic & social sciences</json:string>
<json:string>social sciences</json:string>
<json:string>social work</json:string>
</scienceMetrix>
<inist>
<json:string>sciences humaines et sociales</json:string>
</inist>
</categories>
<publicationDate>2002</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>2002</copyrightDate>
<doi>
<json:string>10.1093/bjsw/32.2.135</json:string>
</doi>
<id>E430E0DE6BEC5E94C8D4EB4CFD7FD5968B146F79</id>
<score>1</score>
<fulltext>
<json:item>
<extension>pdf</extension>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E430E0DE6BEC5E94C8D4EB4CFD7FD5968B146F79/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<extension>zip</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E430E0DE6BEC5E94C8D4EB4CFD7FD5968B146F79/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/E430E0DE6BEC5E94C8D4EB4CFD7FD5968B146F79/fulltext/tei">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Rethinking Empowerment: A Postmodern Reappraisal for Emancipatory Practice</title>
<respStmt>
<resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp>
<name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher>
<availability>
<p>Copyright British Association of Social Workers 2002</p>
</availability>
<date>2002</date>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct type="inbook">
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Rethinking Empowerment: A Postmodern Reappraisal for Emancipatory Practice</title>
<author xml:id="author-1">
<persName>
<forename type="first">Bob</forename>
<surname>Pease</surname>
</persName>
<email>bob.pease@rmit.edu.au</email>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<title level="j">British Journal of Social Work</title>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">Br J Soc Work</title>
<idno type="pISSN">0045-3102</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1468-263X</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher>
<date type="published" when="2002-03-01"></date>
<biblScope unit="volume">32</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="135">135</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="147">147</biblScope>
</imprint>
</monogr>
<idno type="istex">E430E0DE6BEC5E94C8D4EB4CFD7FD5968B146F79</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1093/bjsw/32.2.135</idno>
<idno type="local">320135</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<creation>
<date>2002</date>
</creation>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
<abstract xml:lang="en">
<p>This article is concerned with the implications of the postmodern challenge to critical theory for the practice of empowerment. How do we conceptualize empowerment from a postmodern perspective? It is argued that the modernist concept of power upon which empowerment rests, can have unintended disempowering effects. By conceptualizing power as a commodity, identities are forced into a powerful–powerless dualism which does not always do justice to diverse experiences. Thus we can sometimes contribute to dominance in spite of our liberatory intentions. It is argued that social workers need to become more aware of the self‐disciplining and self‐regulatory processes involved in professional work to address the social relations of power embedded in professional practices. Foucault's analysis of how marginalized knowledges are affected by dominant cultural practices suggests a redefining of empowerment as the insurrection of subjugated knowledge. The implications of this redefinition for practice is illustrated by reference to work with indigenous people in Australia.</p>
</abstract>
</profileDesc>
<revisionDesc>
<change when="2002-03-01">Published</change>
<change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2016-12-22">References added</change>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
<json:item>
<extension>txt</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E430E0DE6BEC5E94C8D4EB4CFD7FD5968B146F79/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
</fulltext>
<metadata>
<istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="corpus oup" wicri:toSee="no header">
<istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:docType PUBLIC="-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" URI="journalpublishing.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType>
<istex:document>
<article xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="hwp">bjsw</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Br J Soc Work</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">social</journal-id>
<journal-title>British Journal of Social Work</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">Br J Soc Work</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0045-3102</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1468-263X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Oxford University Press</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="other">320135</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bjsw/32.2.135</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Article</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Rethinking Empowerment: A Postmodern Reappraisal for Emancipatory Practice</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pease</surname>
<given-names>Bob</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="AFF1"></xref>
</contrib>
<aff id="AFF1">School of Social Work and Planning, RMIT University, PO Box 2476V, Melbourne, Victoria 3001, Australia.
<ext-link xlink:href="bob.pease@rmit.edu.au" ext-link-type="email">E-mail: bob.pease@rmit.edu.au</ext-link>
</aff>
</contrib-group>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<day>1</day>
<month>3</month>
<year>2002</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>32</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<fpage>135</fpage>
<lpage>147</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="accepted">
<month>10</month>
<year>2000</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright British Association of Social Workers 2002</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2002</copyright-year>
</permissions>
<abstract xml:lang="en">
<p>This article is concerned with the implications of the postmodern challenge to critical theory for the practice of empowerment. How do we conceptualize empowerment from a postmodern perspective? It is argued that the modernist concept of power upon which empowerment rests, can have unintended disempowering effects. By conceptualizing power as a commodity, identities are forced into a powerful–powerless dualism which does not always do justice to diverse experiences. Thus we can sometimes contribute to dominance in spite of our liberatory intentions. It is argued that social workers need to become more aware of the self‐disciplining and self‐regulatory processes involved in professional work to address the social relations of power embedded in professional practices. Foucault's analysis of how marginalized knowledges are affected by dominant cultural practices suggests a redefining of empowerment as the insurrection of subjugated knowledge. The implications of this redefinition for practice is illustrated by reference to work with indigenous people in Australia.</p>
</abstract>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>hwp-legacy-fpage</meta-name>
<meta-value>135</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>hwp-legacy-dochead</meta-name>
<meta-value>Article</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
</article>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6">
<titleInfo lang="en">
<title>Rethinking Empowerment: A Postmodern Reappraisal for Emancipatory Practice</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" lang="en" contentType="CDATA">
<title>Rethinking Empowerment: A Postmodern Reappraisal for Emancipatory Practice</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Bob</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Pease</namePart>
<affiliation>School of Social Work and Planning, RMIT University, PO Box 2476V, Melbourne, Victoria 3001, Australia. E-mail: bob.pease@rmit.edu.au</affiliation>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="research-article" displayLabel="research-article"></genre>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2002-03-01</dateIssued>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2002</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract lang="en">This article is concerned with the implications of the postmodern challenge to critical theory for the practice of empowerment. How do we conceptualize empowerment from a postmodern perspective? It is argued that the modernist concept of power upon which empowerment rests, can have unintended disempowering effects. By conceptualizing power as a commodity, identities are forced into a powerful–powerless dualism which does not always do justice to diverse experiences. Thus we can sometimes contribute to dominance in spite of our liberatory intentions. It is argued that social workers need to become more aware of the self‐disciplining and self‐regulatory processes involved in professional work to address the social relations of power embedded in professional practices. Foucault's analysis of how marginalized knowledges are affected by dominant cultural practices suggests a redefining of empowerment as the insurrection of subjugated knowledge. The implications of this redefinition for practice is illustrated by reference to work with indigenous people in Australia.</abstract>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>British Journal of Social Work</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="abbreviated">
<title>Br J Soc Work</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal">journal</genre>
<identifier type="ISSN">0045-3102</identifier>
<identifier type="eISSN">1468-263X</identifier>
<identifier type="PublisherID">social</identifier>
<identifier type="PublisherID-hwp">bjsw</identifier>
<identifier type="PublisherID-nlm-ta">Br J Soc Work</identifier>
<part>
<date>2002</date>
<detail type="volume">
<caption>vol.</caption>
<number>32</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<caption>no.</caption>
<number>2</number>
</detail>
<extent unit="pages">
<start>135</start>
<end>147</end>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">E430E0DE6BEC5E94C8D4EB4CFD7FD5968B146F79</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1093/bjsw/32.2.135</identifier>
<identifier type="local">320135</identifier>
<accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright British Association of Social Workers 2002</accessCondition>
<recordInfo>
<recordContentSource>OUP</recordContentSource>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
</metadata>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Psychologie/explor/TherFamFrancoV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001024 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001024 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Psychologie
   |area=    TherFamFrancoV1
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:E430E0DE6BEC5E94C8D4EB4CFD7FD5968B146F79
   |texte=   Rethinking Empowerment: A Postmodern Reappraisal for Emancipatory Practice
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.29.
Data generation: Tue May 16 11:23:40 2017. Site generation: Mon Feb 12 23:51:41 2024