Neurocognitive speed and inconsistency in Parkinson's disease with and without incipient dementia: an 18-month prospective cohort study.
Identifieur interne : 000A49 ( PubMed/Curation ); précédent : 000A48; suivant : 000A50Neurocognitive speed and inconsistency in Parkinson's disease with and without incipient dementia: an 18-month prospective cohort study.
Auteurs : Cindy M. De Frias [États-Unis] ; Roger A. Dixon ; Richard CamicioliSource :
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS [ 1469-7661 ] ; 2012.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cognition (physiology), Cohort Studies, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Dementia (complications), Dementia (psychology), Educational Status, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Parkinson Disease (complications), Parkinson Disease (psychology), Prospective Studies, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time (physiology).
- MESH :
- complications : Dementia, Parkinson Disease.
- physiology : Cognition, Reaction Time.
- psychology : Dementia, Parkinson Disease.
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cohort Studies, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Prospective Studies, Psychomotor Performance.
Abstract
We examined two-wave longitudinal changes in two indicators of neurocognitive speed (i.e., mean rate, intraindividual variability) using one simple and three complex reaction time tasks. Participants included idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, with and without incipient dementia, and normal controls. At baseline, there were 45 patients (26 men, 19 women) with idiopathic PD who ranged from 65 to 84 years (M = 71.3; SD = 4.5) and 47 matched controls (27 men, 20 women) who ranged from 65 to 84 years (M = 71.4; SD = 4.9). The 18-month longitudinal sample comprised of 74 returning participants (43 controls; 31 PD patients) who had no cognitive impairment or dementia at both waves. Ten of the 31 PD patients returning for Time 3 had dementia or cognitive impairment. These constituted the PD with incipient dementia (PDID) group. Repeated measures analyses of variance showed that the PD and PDID groups were slower over time on the reaction time tasks, whereas the controls improved their performance over time on all tasks. Inconsistency distinguished the two clinical groups (i.e., the PDID group but not the PD group became more inconsistent over time). Changes in neurocognitive speed and inconsistency may be valid clinical markers of PDID.
DOI: 10.1017/S1355617712000422
PubMed: 22621940
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000A49
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:22621940Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Neurocognitive speed and inconsistency in Parkinson's disease with and without incipient dementia: an 18-month prospective cohort study.</title><author><name sortKey="De Frias, Cindy M" sort="De Frias, Cindy M" uniqKey="De Frias C" first="Cindy M" last="De Frias">Cindy M. De Frias</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080, USA. cdefrias@utdallas.edu</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Dixon, Roger A" sort="Dixon, Roger A" uniqKey="Dixon R" first="Roger A" last="Dixon">Roger A. Dixon</name></author><author><name sortKey="Camicioli, Richard" sort="Camicioli, Richard" uniqKey="Camicioli R" first="Richard" last="Camicioli">Richard Camicioli</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2012">2012</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:22621940</idno><idno type="pmid">22621940</idno><idno type="doi">10.1017/S1355617712000422</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000A49</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000A49</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000A49</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000A49</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Neurocognitive speed and inconsistency in Parkinson's disease with and without incipient dementia: an 18-month prospective cohort study.</title><author><name sortKey="De Frias, Cindy M" sort="De Frias, Cindy M" uniqKey="De Frias C" first="Cindy M" last="De Frias">Cindy M. De Frias</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080, USA. cdefrias@utdallas.edu</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country><wicri:regionArea>School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Dixon, Roger A" sort="Dixon, Roger A" uniqKey="Dixon R" first="Roger A" last="Dixon">Roger A. Dixon</name></author><author><name sortKey="Camicioli, Richard" sort="Camicioli, Richard" uniqKey="Camicioli R" first="Richard" last="Camicioli">Richard Camicioli</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS</title><idno type="eISSN">1469-7661</idno><imprint><date when="2012" type="published">2012</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Cognition (physiology)</term><term>Cohort Studies</term><term>Data Interpretation, Statistical</term><term>Dementia (complications)</term><term>Dementia (psychology)</term><term>Educational Status</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Longitudinal Studies</term><term>Male</term><term>Neuropsychological Tests</term><term>Parkinson Disease (complications)</term><term>Parkinson Disease (psychology)</term><term>Prospective Studies</term><term>Psychomotor Performance</term><term>Reaction Time (physiology)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="complications" xml:lang="en"><term>Dementia</term><term>Parkinson Disease</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Cognition</term><term>Reaction Time</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychology" xml:lang="en"><term>Dementia</term><term>Parkinson Disease</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Cohort Studies</term><term>Data Interpretation, Statistical</term><term>Educational Status</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Longitudinal Studies</term><term>Male</term><term>Neuropsychological Tests</term><term>Prospective Studies</term><term>Psychomotor Performance</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">We examined two-wave longitudinal changes in two indicators of neurocognitive speed (i.e., mean rate, intraindividual variability) using one simple and three complex reaction time tasks. Participants included idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, with and without incipient dementia, and normal controls. At baseline, there were 45 patients (26 men, 19 women) with idiopathic PD who ranged from 65 to 84 years (M = 71.3; SD = 4.5) and 47 matched controls (27 men, 20 women) who ranged from 65 to 84 years (M = 71.4; SD = 4.9). The 18-month longitudinal sample comprised of 74 returning participants (43 controls; 31 PD patients) who had no cognitive impairment or dementia at both waves. Ten of the 31 PD patients returning for Time 3 had dementia or cognitive impairment. These constituted the PD with incipient dementia (PDID) group. Repeated measures analyses of variance showed that the PD and PDID groups were slower over time on the reaction time tasks, whereas the controls improved their performance over time on all tasks. Inconsistency distinguished the two clinical groups (i.e., the PDID group but not the PD group became more inconsistent over time). Changes in neurocognitive speed and inconsistency may be valid clinical markers of PDID.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">22621940</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2012</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>13</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2012</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>27</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2017</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>20</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1469-7661</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>18</Volume><Issue>4</Issue><PubDate><Year>2012</Year><Month>Jul</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Int Neuropsychol Soc</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Neurocognitive speed and inconsistency in Parkinson's disease with and without incipient dementia: an 18-month prospective cohort study.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>764-72</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1017/S1355617712000422</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>We examined two-wave longitudinal changes in two indicators of neurocognitive speed (i.e., mean rate, intraindividual variability) using one simple and three complex reaction time tasks. Participants included idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, with and without incipient dementia, and normal controls. At baseline, there were 45 patients (26 men, 19 women) with idiopathic PD who ranged from 65 to 84 years (M = 71.3; SD = 4.5) and 47 matched controls (27 men, 20 women) who ranged from 65 to 84 years (M = 71.4; SD = 4.9). The 18-month longitudinal sample comprised of 74 returning participants (43 controls; 31 PD patients) who had no cognitive impairment or dementia at both waves. Ten of the 31 PD patients returning for Time 3 had dementia or cognitive impairment. These constituted the PD with incipient dementia (PDID) group. Repeated measures analyses of variance showed that the PD and PDID groups were slower over time on the reaction time tasks, whereas the controls improved their performance over time on all tasks. Inconsistency distinguished the two clinical groups (i.e., the PDID group but not the PD group became more inconsistent over time). Changes in neurocognitive speed and inconsistency may be valid clinical markers of PDID.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>de Frias</LastName><ForeName>Cindy M</ForeName><Initials>CM</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080, USA. cdefrias@utdallas.edu</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Dixon</LastName><ForeName>Roger A</ForeName><Initials>RA</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Camicioli</LastName><ForeName>Richard</ForeName><Initials>R</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><GrantList CompleteYN="Y"><Grant><GrantID>R01 AG008235</GrantID><Acronym>AG</Acronym><Agency>NIA NIH HHS</Agency><Country>United States</Country></Grant><Grant><GrantID>R37 AG008235</GrantID><Acronym>AG</Acronym><Agency>NIA NIH HHS</Agency><Country>United States</Country></Grant><Grant><GrantID>MOP-67132</GrantID><Agency>Canadian Institutes of Health Research</Agency><Country>Canada</Country></Grant></GrantList><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D052061">Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2012</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>24</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>England</Country><MedlineTA>J Int Neuropsychol Soc</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9503760</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1355-6177</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><CommentsCorrectionsList><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2009 Mar;15(3):187-95</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18573676</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neurology. 1967 May;17(5):427-42</RefSource><PMID Version="1">6067254</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Mov Disord. 2004 Sep;19(9):1043-9</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15372593</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2011 Jan;17(1):101-11</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21073771</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1989 Sep;52(9):1033-42</RefSource><PMID Version="1">2795072</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychol Aging. 2010 Sep;25(3):575-86</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20853965</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Mov Disord. 2005 Oct;20(10):1255-63</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16041803</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1996;11(7):613-23</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14588445</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1988 Jun;51(6):745-52</RefSource><PMID Version="1">2841426</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neurosci Lett. 2008 Aug 15;441(1):77-80</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18597939</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2008 Sep;21(3):204-18</RefSource><PMID Version="1">18838743</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neurology. 2000 Dec 12;55(11):1621-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11113214</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Ann Neurol. 1980 May;7(5):486-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7396427</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Mov Disord. 2011 Jul;26(8):1443-50</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21442661</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychopharmacol Bull. 1988;24(4):709-11</RefSource><PMID Version="1">3249773</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007 Jan;22(1):15-24</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17142007</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neurology. 1993 Nov;43(11):2412-4</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8232972</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2006 Jan;28(1):67-83</RefSource><PMID Version="1">16448976</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2011 Jul;33(6):647-57</RefSource><PMID Version="1">21416426</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuropsychology. 2000 Oct;14(4):588-98</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11055261</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neurology. 2002 Oct 8;59(7):1042-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">12370459</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Mov Disord. 2003 Dec;18(12):1455-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14673881</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neurology. 2010 Mar 16;74(11):885-92</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20181924</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995 Feb;43(2):130-7</RefSource><PMID Version="1">7836636</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 1999 Winter;12(4):180-8</RefSource><PMID Version="1">10616865</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuropsychology. 2007 May;21(3):381-99</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17484601</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuropsychology. 2009 Nov;23(6):746-58</RefSource><PMID Version="1">19899833</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98</RefSource><PMID Version="1">1202204</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Neurosci. 2010 Apr 7;30(14):4914-21</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20371811</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuropsychologia. 2007 Apr 9;45(8):1911-20</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17240409</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuroimage. 2008 Jan 1;39(1):527-37</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17919929</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Gerontology. 2001 Mar-Apr;47(2):100-16</RefSource><PMID Version="1">11287736</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychol Aging. 2009 Dec;24(4):792-808</RefSource><PMID Version="1">20025396</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(14):1910-6</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15381021</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neurology. 2006 Nov 14;67(9):1605-11</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17101891</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>J Gerontol. 1994 Jul;49(4):P179-89</RefSource><PMID Version="1">8014399</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2004 Jul-Sep;18(3):120-2</RefSource><PMID Version="1">15494616</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuropsychologia. 2007 Jun 18;45(11):2499-507</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17507058</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Neuropsychologia. 2007 Sep 20;45(12):2827-38</RefSource><PMID Version="1">17575988</PMID></CommentsCorrections><CommentsCorrections RefType="Cites"><RefSource>Psychol Aging. 2003 Sep;18(3):510-23</RefSource><PMID Version="1">14518812</PMID></CommentsCorrections></CommentsCorrectionsList><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000368" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000369" MajorTopicYN="N">Aged, 80 and over</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003071" MajorTopicYN="N">Cognition</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015331" MajorTopicYN="N">Cohort Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003627" MajorTopicYN="N">Data Interpretation, Statistical</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003704" MajorTopicYN="N">Dementia</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000150" MajorTopicYN="N">complications</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000523" MajorTopicYN="Y">psychology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D004522" MajorTopicYN="N">Educational Status</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005260" MajorTopicYN="N">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008137" MajorTopicYN="N">Longitudinal Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008297" MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009483" MajorTopicYN="N">Neuropsychological Tests</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010300" MajorTopicYN="N">Parkinson Disease</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000150" MajorTopicYN="N">complications</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000523" MajorTopicYN="Y">psychology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011446" MajorTopicYN="N">Prospective Studies</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011597" MajorTopicYN="N">Psychomotor Performance</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011930" MajorTopicYN="N">Reaction Time</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><OtherID Source="NLM">NIHMS504371</OtherID><OtherID Source="NLM">PMC3804032</OtherID></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2012</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>25</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2012</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>25</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2012</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>28</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22621940</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">S1355617712000422</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1017/S1355617712000422</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3804032</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="mid">NIHMS504371</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Canada/explor/ParkinsonCanadaV1/Data/PubMed/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000A49 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000A49 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Canada
|area= ParkinsonCanadaV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:22621940
|texte= Neurocognitive speed and inconsistency in Parkinson's disease with and without incipient dementia: an 18-month prospective cohort study.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:22621940" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a ParkinsonCanadaV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.29. |  |