For My Eyes Only: Gaze Control, Enmeshment, and Relationship Quality
Identifieur interne : 000271 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000270; suivant : 000272For My Eyes Only: Gaze Control, Enmeshment, and Relationship Quality
Auteurs : Raluca Petrican ; Christopher T. Burris ; Tania Bielak ; Ulrich Schimmack ; Morris MoscovitchSource :
- Journal of personality and social psychology [ 0022-3514 ] ; 2011.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Perceived closeness that preserves the distinctness of each partner enhances intimate relationship quality, whereas pseudocloseness or enmeshment-reflecting an inability to distinguish one's own thoughts and emotions from a partner's-may have more negative outcomes (R. J. Green & P. D. Werner, 1996). Two studies investigated whether a dispositional inability to differentiate self from other is manifested at the attentional level as reduced capacity to inhibit following the gaze of another (A. Frischen, A. P. Bayliss, & S. P. Tipper, 2007). Among healthy elderly spouses in Study 1, superior gaze control predicted superior sociocognitive functioning, and those with poorer gaze control abilities were perceived by the partner as constricting the perceiving partner's autonomy, which in turn predicted lower relationship satisfaction among the latter. Moreover, these links were mediated by enmeshment, as indicated by the percentage of "we"-focused versus "I"- or partner-focused thoughts and emotions in the partners' independent accounts of the same relationship events. Extending these findings in a sample of Parkinson's disease patients and their spouses, Study 2 revealed a biphasic effect of self-other differentiation on relationship dynamics: In the early stages of the disease, increased couple focus promoted superior relationship quality, whereas lack of self-other differentiation predicted poorer relationship quality later. Thus, dispositional variations in fundamental social-perceptual processes predict both close relationship dynamics and long-term relationship quality.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
pA |
|
---|
Format Inist (serveur)
NO : | PASCAL 11-0469362 INIST |
---|---|
ET : | For My Eyes Only: Gaze Control, Enmeshment, and Relationship Quality |
AU : | PETRICAN (Raluca); BURRIS (Christopher T.); BIELAK (Tania); SCHIMMACK (Ulrich); MOSCOVITCH (Morris) |
AF : | University of Toronto/Canada (1 aut., 5 aut.); St. Jerome's University/Canada (2 aut.); University of Waterloo/Canada (3 aut.); University of Toronto/Mississauga/Canada (4 aut.) |
DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
SO : | Journal of personality and social psychology; ISSN 0022-3514; Coden JPSPB2; Etats-Unis; Da. 2011; Vol. 100; No. 6; Pp. 1111-1123; Bibl. 1 p.1/4 |
LA : | Anglais |
EA : | Perceived closeness that preserves the distinctness of each partner enhances intimate relationship quality, whereas pseudocloseness or enmeshment-reflecting an inability to distinguish one's own thoughts and emotions from a partner's-may have more negative outcomes (R. J. Green & P. D. Werner, 1996). Two studies investigated whether a dispositional inability to differentiate self from other is manifested at the attentional level as reduced capacity to inhibit following the gaze of another (A. Frischen, A. P. Bayliss, & S. P. Tipper, 2007). Among healthy elderly spouses in Study 1, superior gaze control predicted superior sociocognitive functioning, and those with poorer gaze control abilities were perceived by the partner as constricting the perceiving partner's autonomy, which in turn predicted lower relationship satisfaction among the latter. Moreover, these links were mediated by enmeshment, as indicated by the percentage of "we"-focused versus "I"- or partner-focused thoughts and emotions in the partners' independent accounts of the same relationship events. Extending these findings in a sample of Parkinson's disease patients and their spouses, Study 2 revealed a biphasic effect of self-other differentiation on relationship dynamics: In the early stages of the disease, increased couple focus promoted superior relationship quality, whereas lack of self-other differentiation predicted poorer relationship quality later. Thus, dispositional variations in fundamental social-perceptual processes predict both close relationship dynamics and long-term relationship quality. |
CC : | 002A26M07 |
FD : | Relation conjugale; Satisfaction conjugale; Théorie esprit; Mémoire de travail; Mariage; Attention conjointe; Homme |
FG : | Interaction sociale; Cognition sociale; Cognition |
ED : | Marital relation; Marital satisfaction; Theory of mind; Working memory; Marriage; Joint attention; Human |
EG : | Social interaction; Social cognition; Cognition |
SD : | Relación conyugal; Satisfacción conyugal; Teoria espíritu; Memoria trabajo; Matrimonio; Atención conjunta; Hombre |
LO : | INIST-13817.354000191623700100 |
ID : | 11-0469362 |
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:11-0469362Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">For My Eyes Only: Gaze Control, Enmeshment, and Relationship Quality</title>
<author><name sortKey="Petrican, Raluca" sort="Petrican, Raluca" uniqKey="Petrican R" first="Raluca" last="Petrican">Raluca Petrican</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Toronto</s1>
<s3>CAN</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Burris, Christopher T" sort="Burris, Christopher T" uniqKey="Burris C" first="Christopher T." last="Burris">Christopher T. Burris</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>St. Jerome's University</s1>
<s3>CAN</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Bielak, Tania" sort="Bielak, Tania" uniqKey="Bielak T" first="Tania" last="Bielak">Tania Bielak</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>University of Waterloo</s1>
<s3>CAN</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Schimmack, Ulrich" sort="Schimmack, Ulrich" uniqKey="Schimmack U" first="Ulrich" last="Schimmack">Ulrich Schimmack</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>University of Toronto</s1>
<s2>Mississauga</s2>
<s3>CAN</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Moscovitch, Morris" sort="Moscovitch, Morris" uniqKey="Moscovitch M" first="Morris" last="Moscovitch">Morris Moscovitch</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Toronto</s1>
<s3>CAN</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">11-0469362</idno>
<date when="2011">2011</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 11-0469362 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:11-0469362</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000271</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">For My Eyes Only: Gaze Control, Enmeshment, and Relationship Quality</title>
<author><name sortKey="Petrican, Raluca" sort="Petrican, Raluca" uniqKey="Petrican R" first="Raluca" last="Petrican">Raluca Petrican</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Toronto</s1>
<s3>CAN</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Burris, Christopher T" sort="Burris, Christopher T" uniqKey="Burris C" first="Christopher T." last="Burris">Christopher T. Burris</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>St. Jerome's University</s1>
<s3>CAN</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Bielak, Tania" sort="Bielak, Tania" uniqKey="Bielak T" first="Tania" last="Bielak">Tania Bielak</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>University of Waterloo</s1>
<s3>CAN</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Schimmack, Ulrich" sort="Schimmack, Ulrich" uniqKey="Schimmack U" first="Ulrich" last="Schimmack">Ulrich Schimmack</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>University of Toronto</s1>
<s2>Mississauga</s2>
<s3>CAN</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Moscovitch, Morris" sort="Moscovitch, Morris" uniqKey="Moscovitch M" first="Morris" last="Moscovitch">Morris Moscovitch</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Toronto</s1>
<s3>CAN</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of personality and social psychology</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. pers. soc. psychol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3514</idno>
<imprint><date when="2011">2011</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Journal of personality and social psychology</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. pers. soc. psychol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3514</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Human</term>
<term>Joint attention</term>
<term>Marital relation</term>
<term>Marital satisfaction</term>
<term>Marriage</term>
<term>Theory of mind</term>
<term>Working memory</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Relation conjugale</term>
<term>Satisfaction conjugale</term>
<term>Théorie esprit</term>
<term>Mémoire de travail</term>
<term>Mariage</term>
<term>Attention conjointe</term>
<term>Homme</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Perceived closeness that preserves the distinctness of each partner enhances intimate relationship quality, whereas pseudocloseness or enmeshment-reflecting an inability to distinguish one's own thoughts and emotions from a partner's-may have more negative outcomes (R. J. Green & P. D. Werner, 1996). Two studies investigated whether a dispositional inability to differentiate self from other is manifested at the attentional level as reduced capacity to inhibit following the gaze of another (A. Frischen, A. P. Bayliss, & S. P. Tipper, 2007). Among healthy elderly spouses in Study 1, superior gaze control predicted superior sociocognitive functioning, and those with poorer gaze control abilities were perceived by the partner as constricting the perceiving partner's autonomy, which in turn predicted lower relationship satisfaction among the latter. Moreover, these links were mediated by enmeshment, as indicated by the percentage of "we"-focused versus "I"- or partner-focused thoughts and emotions in the partners' independent accounts of the same relationship events. Extending these findings in a sample of Parkinson's disease patients and their spouses, Study 2 revealed a biphasic effect of self-other differentiation on relationship dynamics: In the early stages of the disease, increased couple focus promoted superior relationship quality, whereas lack of self-other differentiation predicted poorer relationship quality later. Thus, dispositional variations in fundamental social-perceptual processes predict both close relationship dynamics and long-term relationship quality.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0022-3514</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>JPSPB2</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>J. pers. soc. psychol.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>100</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>6</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>For My Eyes Only: Gaze Control, Enmeshment, and Relationship Quality</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>PETRICAN (Raluca)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>BURRIS (Christopher T.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>BIELAK (Tania)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>SCHIMMACK (Ulrich)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>MOSCOVITCH (Morris)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Toronto</s1>
<s3>CAN</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>St. Jerome's University</s1>
<s3>CAN</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="03"><s1>University of Waterloo</s1>
<s3>CAN</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="04"><s1>University of Toronto</s1>
<s2>Mississauga</s2>
<s3>CAN</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>1111-1123</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2011</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>13817</s2>
<s5>354000191623700100</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2011 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>1 p.1/4</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>11-0469362</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Journal of personality and social psychology</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Perceived closeness that preserves the distinctness of each partner enhances intimate relationship quality, whereas pseudocloseness or enmeshment-reflecting an inability to distinguish one's own thoughts and emotions from a partner's-may have more negative outcomes (R. J. Green & P. D. Werner, 1996). Two studies investigated whether a dispositional inability to differentiate self from other is manifested at the attentional level as reduced capacity to inhibit following the gaze of another (A. Frischen, A. P. Bayliss, & S. P. Tipper, 2007). Among healthy elderly spouses in Study 1, superior gaze control predicted superior sociocognitive functioning, and those with poorer gaze control abilities were perceived by the partner as constricting the perceiving partner's autonomy, which in turn predicted lower relationship satisfaction among the latter. Moreover, these links were mediated by enmeshment, as indicated by the percentage of "we"-focused versus "I"- or partner-focused thoughts and emotions in the partners' independent accounts of the same relationship events. Extending these findings in a sample of Parkinson's disease patients and their spouses, Study 2 revealed a biphasic effect of self-other differentiation on relationship dynamics: In the early stages of the disease, increased couple focus promoted superior relationship quality, whereas lack of self-other differentiation predicted poorer relationship quality later. Thus, dispositional variations in fundamental social-perceptual processes predict both close relationship dynamics and long-term relationship quality.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002A26M07</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Relation conjugale</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Marital relation</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Relación conyugal</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Satisfaction conjugale</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Marital satisfaction</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Satisfacción conyugal</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Théorie esprit</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Theory of mind</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Teoria espíritu</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Mémoire de travail</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Working memory</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Memoria trabajo</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Mariage</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Marriage</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Matrimonio</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Attention conjointe</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Joint attention</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Atención conjunta</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Interaction sociale</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Social interaction</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Interacción social</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Cognition sociale</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Social cognition</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cognición social</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cognición</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>325</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 11-0469362 INIST</NO>
<ET>For My Eyes Only: Gaze Control, Enmeshment, and Relationship Quality</ET>
<AU>PETRICAN (Raluca); BURRIS (Christopher T.); BIELAK (Tania); SCHIMMACK (Ulrich); MOSCOVITCH (Morris)</AU>
<AF>University of Toronto/Canada (1 aut., 5 aut.); St. Jerome's University/Canada (2 aut.); University of Waterloo/Canada (3 aut.); University of Toronto/Mississauga/Canada (4 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Journal of personality and social psychology; ISSN 0022-3514; Coden JPSPB2; Etats-Unis; Da. 2011; Vol. 100; No. 6; Pp. 1111-1123; Bibl. 1 p.1/4</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Perceived closeness that preserves the distinctness of each partner enhances intimate relationship quality, whereas pseudocloseness or enmeshment-reflecting an inability to distinguish one's own thoughts and emotions from a partner's-may have more negative outcomes (R. J. Green & P. D. Werner, 1996). Two studies investigated whether a dispositional inability to differentiate self from other is manifested at the attentional level as reduced capacity to inhibit following the gaze of another (A. Frischen, A. P. Bayliss, & S. P. Tipper, 2007). Among healthy elderly spouses in Study 1, superior gaze control predicted superior sociocognitive functioning, and those with poorer gaze control abilities were perceived by the partner as constricting the perceiving partner's autonomy, which in turn predicted lower relationship satisfaction among the latter. Moreover, these links were mediated by enmeshment, as indicated by the percentage of "we"-focused versus "I"- or partner-focused thoughts and emotions in the partners' independent accounts of the same relationship events. Extending these findings in a sample of Parkinson's disease patients and their spouses, Study 2 revealed a biphasic effect of self-other differentiation on relationship dynamics: In the early stages of the disease, increased couple focus promoted superior relationship quality, whereas lack of self-other differentiation predicted poorer relationship quality later. Thus, dispositional variations in fundamental social-perceptual processes predict both close relationship dynamics and long-term relationship quality.</EA>
<CC>002A26M07</CC>
<FD>Relation conjugale; Satisfaction conjugale; Théorie esprit; Mémoire de travail; Mariage; Attention conjointe; Homme</FD>
<FG>Interaction sociale; Cognition sociale; Cognition</FG>
<ED>Marital relation; Marital satisfaction; Theory of mind; Working memory; Marriage; Joint attention; Human</ED>
<EG>Social interaction; Social cognition; Cognition</EG>
<SD>Relación conyugal; Satisfacción conyugal; Teoria espíritu; Memoria trabajo; Matrimonio; Atención conjunta; Hombre</SD>
<LO>INIST-13817.354000191623700100</LO>
<ID>11-0469362</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Canada/explor/ParkinsonCanadaV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000271 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000271 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Canada |area= ParkinsonCanadaV1 |flux= PascalFrancis |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= Pascal:11-0469362 |texte= For My Eyes Only: Gaze Control, Enmeshment, and Relationship Quality }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.29. | ![]() |