La maladie de Parkinson au Canada (serveur d'exploration)

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Are the available apathy measures reliable and valid? A review of the psychometric evidence

Identifieur interne : 000E03 ( Ncbi/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000E02; suivant : 000E04

Are the available apathy measures reliable and valid? A review of the psychometric evidence

Auteurs : Diana E. Clarke ; Jean Y. Ko ; Emily A. Kuhl ; Robert Van Reekum ; Rocio Salvador ; Robert S. Marin

Source :

RBID : PMC:3902773

Abstract

Objective

Apathy is highly prevalent among neuropsychiatric populations and is associated with greater morbidity and worse functional outcomes. Despite this, it remains understudied and poorly understood, primarily due to lack of consensus definition and clear diagnostic criteria for apathy. Without a gold standard for defining and measuring apathy, the availability of empirically sound measures is imperative. This paper provides a psychometric review of the most commonly used apathy measures and provides recommendations for use and further research.

Methods

Pertinent literature databases were searched to identify all available assessment tools for apathy in adults aged 18 and older. Evidence of the reliability and validity of the scales were examined. Alternate variations of scales (e.g., non-English versions) were also evaluated if the validating articles were written in English.

Results

Fifteen apathy scales or subscales were examined. The most psychometrically robust measures for assessing apathy across any disease population appear to be the Apathy Evaluation Scale and the apathy subscale of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory based on the criteria set in this review. For assessment in specific populations, the Dementia Apathy Interview and Rating for patients with Alzheimer’s dementia, the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for schizophrenia populations, and the Frontal System Behavior Scale for patients with fronto-temporal deficits are reliable and valid measures.

Conclusion

Clinicians and researchers have numerous apathy scales for use in broad and disease-specific neuropsychiatric populations. Our understanding of apathy would be advanced by research that helps build a consensus as to the definition and diagnosis of apathy, and further refine the psychometric properties of all apathy assessment tools.


Url:
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.01.012
PubMed: 21193104
PubMed Central: 3902773


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

PMC:3902773

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Are the available apathy measures reliable and valid? A review of the psychometric evidence</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Clarke, Diana E" sort="Clarke, Diana E" uniqKey="Clarke D" first="Diana E." last="Clarke">Diana E. Clarke</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ko, Jean Y" sort="Ko, Jean Y" uniqKey="Ko J" first="Jean Y." last="Ko">Jean Y. Ko</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kuhl, Emily A" sort="Kuhl, Emily A" uniqKey="Kuhl E" first="Emily A." last="Kuhl">Emily A. Kuhl</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van Reekum, Robert" sort="Van Reekum, Robert" uniqKey="Van Reekum R" first="Robert" last="Van Reekum">Robert Van Reekum</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Salvador, Rocio" sort="Salvador, Rocio" uniqKey="Salvador R" first="Rocio" last="Salvador">Rocio Salvador</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Marin, Robert S" sort="Marin, Robert S" uniqKey="Marin R" first="Robert S." last="Marin">Robert S. Marin</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno>
<idno type="pmid">21193104</idno>
<idno type="pmc">3902773</idno>
<idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3902773</idno>
<idno type="RBID">PMC:3902773</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.01.012</idno>
<date when="2010">2010</date>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000722</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">000722</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">000722</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Curation">000722</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Checkpoint">000A66</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000A66</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">000E03</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">000E03</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">000E03</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Are the available apathy measures reliable and valid? A review of the psychometric evidence</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Clarke, Diana E" sort="Clarke, Diana E" uniqKey="Clarke D" first="Diana E." last="Clarke">Diana E. Clarke</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ko, Jean Y" sort="Ko, Jean Y" uniqKey="Ko J" first="Jean Y." last="Ko">Jean Y. Ko</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kuhl, Emily A" sort="Kuhl, Emily A" uniqKey="Kuhl E" first="Emily A." last="Kuhl">Emily A. Kuhl</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van Reekum, Robert" sort="Van Reekum, Robert" uniqKey="Van Reekum R" first="Robert" last="Van Reekum">Robert Van Reekum</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Salvador, Rocio" sort="Salvador, Rocio" uniqKey="Salvador R" first="Rocio" last="Salvador">Rocio Salvador</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Marin, Robert S" sort="Marin, Robert S" uniqKey="Marin R" first="Robert S." last="Marin">Robert S. Marin</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Journal of psychosomatic research</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0022-3999</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1879-1360</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2010">2010</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">
<sec id="S1">
<title>Objective</title>
<p id="P1">Apathy is highly prevalent among neuropsychiatric populations and is associated with greater morbidity and worse functional outcomes. Despite this, it remains understudied and poorly understood, primarily due to lack of consensus definition and clear diagnostic criteria for apathy. Without a gold standard for defining and measuring apathy, the availability of empirically sound measures is imperative. This paper provides a psychometric review of the most commonly used apathy measures and provides recommendations for use and further research.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2">
<title>Methods</title>
<p id="P2">Pertinent literature databases were searched to identify all available assessment tools for apathy in adults aged 18 and older. Evidence of the reliability and validity of the scales were examined. Alternate variations of scales (e.g., non-English versions) were also evaluated if the validating articles were written in English.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S3">
<title>Results</title>
<p id="P3">Fifteen apathy scales or subscales were examined. The most psychometrically robust measures for assessing apathy across any disease population appear to be the Apathy Evaluation Scale and the apathy subscale of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory based on the criteria set in this review. For assessment in specific populations, the Dementia Apathy Interview and Rating for patients with Alzheimer’s dementia, the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale for schizophrenia populations, and the Frontal System Behavior Scale for patients with fronto-temporal deficits are reliable and valid measures.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S4">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p id="P4">Clinicians and researchers have numerous apathy scales for use in broad and disease-specific neuropsychiatric populations. Our understanding of apathy would be advanced by research that helps build a consensus as to the definition and diagnosis of apathy, and further refine the psychometric properties of all apathy assessment tools.</p>
</sec>
</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list></list>
<tree>
<noCountry>
<name sortKey="Clarke, Diana E" sort="Clarke, Diana E" uniqKey="Clarke D" first="Diana E." last="Clarke">Diana E. Clarke</name>
<name sortKey="Ko, Jean Y" sort="Ko, Jean Y" uniqKey="Ko J" first="Jean Y." last="Ko">Jean Y. Ko</name>
<name sortKey="Kuhl, Emily A" sort="Kuhl, Emily A" uniqKey="Kuhl E" first="Emily A." last="Kuhl">Emily A. Kuhl</name>
<name sortKey="Marin, Robert S" sort="Marin, Robert S" uniqKey="Marin R" first="Robert S." last="Marin">Robert S. Marin</name>
<name sortKey="Salvador, Rocio" sort="Salvador, Rocio" uniqKey="Salvador R" first="Rocio" last="Salvador">Rocio Salvador</name>
<name sortKey="Van Reekum, Robert" sort="Van Reekum, Robert" uniqKey="Van Reekum R" first="Robert" last="Van Reekum">Robert Van Reekum</name>
</noCountry>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Canada/explor/ParkinsonCanadaV1/Data/Ncbi/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000E03 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000E03 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Canada
   |area=    ParkinsonCanadaV1
   |flux=    Ncbi
   |étape=   Checkpoint
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     PMC:3902773
   |texte=   Are the available apathy measures reliable and valid? A review of the psychometric evidence
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Checkpoint/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:21193104" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a ParkinsonCanadaV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.29.
Data generation: Thu May 4 22:20:19 2017. Site generation: Fri Dec 23 23:17:26 2022