Impact of storm‐flow on electron transport system activity in river biofilms
Identifieur interne : 004E23 ( Main/Merge ); précédent : 004E22; suivant : 004E24Impact of storm‐flow on electron transport system activity in river biofilms
Auteurs : S. A. Blenkinsopp [Royaume-Uni, Canada] ; M. A. Lock [Royaume-Uni]Source :
- Freshwater Biology [ 0046-5070 ] ; 1992-06.
Abstract
1. The effect of storm‐flow on light‐ and dark‐grown biofilms from a North Wales river was monitored using electron transport system (ETS) activity and epifluorescence cell counts. 2. Artificial substrata were colonized in the river, exposed to ambient‐flow (60 cms−1) or storm‐flow (235 cms−1 with suspended sediment addition) for 12h in a laboratory flow tank, and returned to the river to monitor the recovery period. 3. Total cell densities decreased in both the light‐ and dark‐grown biofilms as a result of storm‐flow. In addition, storm‐flow ETS activity per cell increased significantly in the light‐grown samples (2.7 times) but did not increase significantly in the dark‐grown samples (1.6 times). 5. Within 48 h, storm‐flow total cell densities and ETS activity levels had returned to ambient‐flow levels in both light‐ and dark‐grown biofilms. 6. Within each light regime, despite their different histories, both ambient and storm‐flow samples responded the same to daily changes in the river environment, including a second disruption by natural causes, for the remainder of the 24‐day experiment.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1992.tb00549.x
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 002726
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 002726
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 001E21
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:D75A41592CFFAE42E0998B851EB3B0D95562A697Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Impact of storm‐flow on electron transport system activity in river biofilms</title><author><name sortKey="Blenkinsopp, S A" sort="Blenkinsopp, S A" uniqKey="Blenkinsopp S" first="S. A." last="Blenkinsopp">S. A. Blenkinsopp</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lock, M A" sort="Lock, M A" uniqKey="Lock M" first="M. A." last="Lock">M. A. Lock</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:D75A41592CFFAE42E0998B851EB3B0D95562A697</idno><date when="1992" year="1992">1992</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2427.1992.tb00549.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api-v5.istex.fr/document/D75A41592CFFAE42E0998B851EB3B0D95562A697/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002726</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002726</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">002726</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">001E21</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">001E21</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0046-5070:1992:Blenkinsopp S:impact:of:storm</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">004E23</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Impact of storm‐flow on electron transport system activity in river biofilms</title><author><name sortKey="Blenkinsopp, S A" sort="Blenkinsopp, S A" uniqKey="Blenkinsopp S" first="S. A." last="Blenkinsopp">S. A. Blenkinsopp</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>School of Biological Sciences, University College of North Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Gwynedd LL57 2UW</wicri:noRegion></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="4"><country>Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>*Present address, and address for correspondence: Dr S. Blenkinsopp, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive N.W., Calgary, Alberta</wicri:regionArea><orgName type="university">Université de Calgary</orgName><placeName><settlement type="city">Calgary</settlement><region type="state">Alberta</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lock, M A" sort="Lock, M A" uniqKey="Lock M" first="M. A." last="Lock">M. A. Lock</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>School of Biological Sciences, University College of North Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Gwynedd LL57 2UW</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Freshwater Biology</title><idno type="ISSN">0046-5070</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2427</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1992-06">1992-06</date><biblScope unit="volume">27</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="397">397</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="404">404</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0046-5070</idno></series><idno type="istex">D75A41592CFFAE42E0998B851EB3B0D95562A697</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1365-2427.1992.tb00549.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">FWB397</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0046-5070</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">1. The effect of storm‐flow on light‐ and dark‐grown biofilms from a North Wales river was monitored using electron transport system (ETS) activity and epifluorescence cell counts. 2. Artificial substrata were colonized in the river, exposed to ambient‐flow (60 cms−1) or storm‐flow (235 cms−1 with suspended sediment addition) for 12h in a laboratory flow tank, and returned to the river to monitor the recovery period. 3. Total cell densities decreased in both the light‐ and dark‐grown biofilms as a result of storm‐flow. In addition, storm‐flow ETS activity per cell increased significantly in the light‐grown samples (2.7 times) but did not increase significantly in the dark‐grown samples (1.6 times). 5. Within 48 h, storm‐flow total cell densities and ETS activity levels had returned to ambient‐flow levels in both light‐ and dark‐grown biofilms. 6. Within each light regime, despite their different histories, both ambient and storm‐flow samples responded the same to daily changes in the river environment, including a second disruption by natural causes, for the remainder of the 24‐day experiment.</div></front></TEI></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Canada/explor/ParkinsonCanadaV1/Data/Main/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004E23 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 004E23 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Canada
|area= ParkinsonCanadaV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Merge
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:D75A41592CFFAE42E0998B851EB3B0D95562A697
|texte= Impact of storm‐flow on electron transport system activity in river biofilms
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.29. |  |