REFORMING CUSTODY LAWS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
Identifieur interne : 002C30 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 002C29; suivant : 002C31REFORMING CUSTODY LAWS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
Auteurs : Helen Rhoades [Australie] ; Susan B. Boyd [Canada, Australie]Source :
- International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family [ 1360-9939 ] ; 2004-08.
Abstract
This article looks at the outcomes of recent custody law reform inquiries in Canada and Australia, and examines the ways in which the reform processes in each country dealt with the claims of the various stakeholders and the emerging empirical research on post-separation parenting. Although the outcomes of the two processes were significantly different – one espousing a belief that ‘no one size fits all families’, the other promoting different approaches for differently situated families with a preference for shared parenting – it is argued that both reflect the moderating influence of the empirical evidence on the claims made by disaffected consumers of the family law system, a characteristic that distinguishes them from Australia’s 1995 custody reform process.
Url:
DOI: 10.1093/lawfam/18.2.119
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 000709
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 000709
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000D47
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 002F91
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 002C30
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">REFORMING CUSTODY LAWS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY</title><author><name sortKey="Rhoades, Helen" sort="Rhoades, Helen" uniqKey="Rhoades H" first="Helen" last="Rhoades">Helen Rhoades</name></author><author><name sortKey="Boyd, Susan B" sort="Boyd, Susan B" uniqKey="Boyd S" first="Susan B." last="Boyd">Susan B. Boyd</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:594D9711E1B798BA906D39EA9FB758D6DF0E6DFA</idno><date when="2004" year="2004">2004</date><idno type="doi">10.1093/lawfam/18.2.119</idno><idno type="url">https://api-v5.istex.fr/document/594D9711E1B798BA906D39EA9FB758D6DF0E6DFA/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000709</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000709</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000709</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000D47</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000D47</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">1360-9939:2004:Rhoades H:reforming:custody:laws</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">002F91</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">002C30</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">002C30</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">REFORMING CUSTODY LAWS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY</title><author><name sortKey="Rhoades, Helen" sort="Rhoades, Helen" uniqKey="Rhoades H" first="Helen" last="Rhoades">Helen Rhoades</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Faculty of Law, University of Melbourne</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>University of Melbourne</wicri:noRegion></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Faculty of Law, University of Melbourne</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>University of Melbourne</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Boyd, Susan B" sort="Boyd, Susan B" uniqKey="Boyd S" first="Susan B." last="Boyd">Susan B. Boyd</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country><wicri:regionArea>Faculty of Law, University of British Columbia</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>University of British Columbia</wicri:noRegion></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Australie</country><wicri:regionArea>Faculty of Law, University of Melbourne</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>University of Melbourne</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Int J Law Policy Family</title><idno type="ISSN">1360-9939</idno><idno type="eISSN">1464-3707</idno><imprint><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><date type="published" when="2004-08">2004-08</date><biblScope unit="volume">18</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="119">119</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="146">146</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1360-9939</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1360-9939</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This article looks at the outcomes of recent custody law reform inquiries in Canada and Australia, and examines the ways in which the reform processes in each country dealt with the claims of the various stakeholders and the emerging empirical research on post-separation parenting. Although the outcomes of the two processes were significantly different – one espousing a belief that ‘no one size fits all families’, the other promoting different approaches for differently situated families with a preference for shared parenting – it is argued that both reflect the moderating influence of the empirical evidence on the claims made by disaffected consumers of the family law system, a characteristic that distinguishes them from Australia’s 1995 custody reform process.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Australie</li><li>Canada</li></country></list><tree><country name="Australie"><noRegion><name sortKey="Rhoades, Helen" sort="Rhoades, Helen" uniqKey="Rhoades H" first="Helen" last="Rhoades">Helen Rhoades</name></noRegion><name sortKey="Boyd, Susan B" sort="Boyd, Susan B" uniqKey="Boyd S" first="Susan B." last="Boyd">Susan B. Boyd</name><name sortKey="Rhoades, Helen" sort="Rhoades, Helen" uniqKey="Rhoades H" first="Helen" last="Rhoades">Helen Rhoades</name></country><country name="Canada"><noRegion><name sortKey="Boyd, Susan B" sort="Boyd, Susan B" uniqKey="Boyd S" first="Susan B." last="Boyd">Susan B. Boyd</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Canada/explor/ParkinsonCanadaV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002C30 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 002C30 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Canada
|area= ParkinsonCanadaV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:594D9711E1B798BA906D39EA9FB758D6DF0E6DFA
|texte= REFORMING CUSTODY LAWS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.29. |  |