THE U.S. PRODUCTIVITY SLOWDOWN: A PEAK THROUGH THE STRUCTURAL BREAK WINDOW
Identifieur interne : 002823 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002822; suivant : 002824THE U.S. PRODUCTIVITY SLOWDOWN: A PEAK THROUGH THE STRUCTURAL BREAK WINDOW
Auteurs : Jim Dolmas ; Baldev Raj ; Daniel J. SlottjeSource :
- Economic Inquiry [ 0095-2583 ] ; 1999-04.
Abstract
This paper provides a formal test of the null hypothesis of a unit root in the log‐level of labor productivity against the alternative of linear trend stationarity with a one‐time structural break in the level and slope of the trend at an a priori unknown date. Using some newly developed time series tests, we show that the log‐level of productivity is more accurately modeled as following a deterministic trend with a regime shift rather than as a unit root process. Some implications of the results for detrending and for testing cointegration relationships between productivity and other variables are discussed. (JEL C22. O40)
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.1999.tb01427.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:6A86ED23B02FDFE07EBF99E1F566CA9FCE017ED2Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">THE U.S. PRODUCTIVITY SLOWDOWN: A PEAK THROUGH THE STRUCTURAL BREAK WINDOW</title><author><name sortKey="Dolmas, Jim" sort="Dolmas, Jim" uniqKey="Dolmas J" first="Jim" last="Dolmas">Jim Dolmas</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Tex.Phone 1–214‐768‐3806, Fax 1–214‐768‐1821 E‐mail Jdolmas@maiI.smu.edu</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Raj, Baldev" sort="Raj, Baldev" uniqKey="Raj B" first="Baldev" last="Raj">Baldev Raj</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Economics, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, Phone 1–5 19‐884‐0710ext. 225, Fax 1–519‐884‐0201 E‐mail braj@mach1.wlu.ca</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Slottje, Daniel J" sort="Slottje, Daniel J" uniqKey="Slottje D" first="Daniel J." last="Slottje">Daniel J. Slottje</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Professor, Department of Economics, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Tex. Phone 1–214‐768‐3555, Fax 1–214‐768‐1821 E‐mail Dslottje@mail.smu.edu</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:6A86ED23B02FDFE07EBF99E1F566CA9FCE017ED2</idno><date when="1999" year="1999">1999</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1465-7295.1999.tb01427.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api-v5.istex.fr/document/6A86ED23B02FDFE07EBF99E1F566CA9FCE017ED2/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002823</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002823</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">THE U.S. PRODUCTIVITY SLOWDOWN: A PEAK THROUGH THE STRUCTURAL BREAK WINDOW</title><author><name sortKey="Dolmas, Jim" sort="Dolmas, Jim" uniqKey="Dolmas J" first="Jim" last="Dolmas">Jim Dolmas</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Tex.Phone 1–214‐768‐3806, Fax 1–214‐768‐1821 E‐mail Jdolmas@maiI.smu.edu</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Raj, Baldev" sort="Raj, Baldev" uniqKey="Raj B" first="Baldev" last="Raj">Baldev Raj</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Economics, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, Phone 1–5 19‐884‐0710ext. 225, Fax 1–519‐884‐0201 E‐mail braj@mach1.wlu.ca</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Slottje, Daniel J" sort="Slottje, Daniel J" uniqKey="Slottje D" first="Daniel J." last="Slottje">Daniel J. Slottje</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Professor, Department of Economics, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Tex. Phone 1–214‐768‐3555, Fax 1–214‐768‐1821 E‐mail Dslottje@mail.smu.edu</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Economic Inquiry</title><idno type="ISSN">0095-2583</idno><idno type="eISSN">1465-7295</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1999-04">1999-04</date><biblScope unit="volume">37</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="226">226</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="241">241</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0095-2583</idno></series><idno type="istex">6A86ED23B02FDFE07EBF99E1F566CA9FCE017ED2</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1465-7295.1999.tb01427.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">ECIN226</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0095-2583</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This paper provides a formal test of the null hypothesis of a unit root in the log‐level of labor productivity against the alternative of linear trend stationarity with a one‐time structural break in the level and slope of the trend at an a priori unknown date. Using some newly developed time series tests, we show that the log‐level of productivity is more accurately modeled as following a deterministic trend with a regime shift rather than as a unit root process. Some implications of the results for detrending and for testing cointegration relationships between productivity and other variables are discussed. (JEL C22. O40)</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Jim Dolmas</name><affiliations><json:string>Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Tex.Phone 1–214‐768‐3806, Fax 1–214‐768‐1821 E‐mail Jdolmas@maiI.smu.edu</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Baldev Raj</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Economics, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, Phone 1–5 19‐884‐0710ext. 225, Fax 1–519‐884‐0201 E‐mail braj@mach1.wlu.ca</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Daniel J. Slottje</name><affiliations><json:string>Professor, Department of Economics, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Tex. Phone 1–214‐768‐3555, Fax 1–214‐768‐1821 E‐mail Dslottje@mail.smu.edu</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>ECIN226</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>This paper provides a formal test of the null hypothesis of a unit root in the log‐level of labor productivity against the alternative of linear trend stationarity with a one‐time structural break in the level and slope of the trend at an a priori unknown date. Using some newly developed time series tests, we show that the log‐level of productivity is more accurately modeled as following a deterministic trend with a regime shift rather than as a unit root process. Some implications of the results for detrending and for testing cointegration relationships between productivity and other variables are discussed. (JEL C22. O40)</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.224</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>495.359 x 721.439 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>631</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>8728</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>52211</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>16</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>102</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>THE U.S. PRODUCTIVITY SLOWDOWN: A PEAK THROUGH THE STRUCTURAL BREAK WINDOW</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Economic Inquiry</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1465-7295</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>0095-2583</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1465-7295</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>ECIN</json:string></publisherId><volume>37</volume><issue>2</issue><pages><first>226</first><last>241</last><total>16</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><categories><wos><json:string>social science</json:string><json:string>economics</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>economic & social sciences</json:string><json:string>economics & business </json:string><json:string>economics</json:string></scienceMetrix><inist><json:string>sciences appliquees, technologies et medecines</json:string><json:string>sciences biologiques et medicales</json:string><json:string>sciences biologiques fondamentales et appliquees. psychologie</json:string><json:string>sylviculture</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>1999</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1999</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.1465-7295.1999.tb01427.x</json:string></doi><id>6A86ED23B02FDFE07EBF99E1F566CA9FCE017ED2</id><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api-v5.istex.fr/document/6A86ED23B02FDFE07EBF99E1F566CA9FCE017ED2/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api-v5.istex.fr/document/6A86ED23B02FDFE07EBF99E1F566CA9FCE017ED2/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api-v5.istex.fr/document/6A86ED23B02FDFE07EBF99E1F566CA9FCE017ED2/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">THE U.S. PRODUCTIVITY SLOWDOWN: A PEAK THROUGH THE STRUCTURAL BREAK WINDOW</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>WILEY</p></availability><date>1999</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">THE U.S. PRODUCTIVITY SLOWDOWN: A PEAK THROUGH THE STRUCTURAL BREAK WINDOW</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">Jim</forename><surname>Dolmas</surname></persName><affiliation>Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Tex.Phone 1–214‐768‐3806, Fax 1–214‐768‐1821 E‐mail Jdolmas@maiI.smu.edu</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">Baldev</forename><surname>Raj</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Economics, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, Phone 1–5 19‐884‐0710ext. 225, Fax 1–519‐884‐0201 E‐mail braj@mach1.wlu.ca</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-3"><persName><forename type="first">Daniel J.</forename><surname>Slottje</surname></persName><note type="biography">*Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the Canadian Economics Association Meetings, Montreal, Canada, June 1995, the Australasian Meeting of the Econometric Society, Perth, Australia, July 1996, and the Camp Econometrics Texas, Port Aransas, Texas, USA, February 15–16, 1997. The paper was also presented at the faculty seminars of the Institute of Advanced Studies, Vienna, Austria, McMaster University and University of Windsor, Canada during 1995, and National Council of Applied Research, New Delhi, India, December 26, 1996. We gratefully acknowledge that financial support for this research was received from grants partly funded by Wilfrid Laurier University (WLU) Operating funds, and partly by the SSHRC General Research Grant awarded to WLU. We also acknowledge helpful discussions with Pierre Perron. We have also benefited from comments of the participants at the conferences and faculty seminars, and two referees of this journal. The usual disclaimer for the remaining errors or misinterpretations applies.</note><affiliation>*Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the Canadian Economics Association Meetings, Montreal, Canada, June 1995, the Australasian Meeting of the Econometric Society, Perth, Australia, July 1996, and the Camp Econometrics Texas, Port Aransas, Texas, USA, February 15–16, 1997. The paper was also presented at the faculty seminars of the Institute of Advanced Studies, Vienna, Austria, McMaster University and University of Windsor, Canada during 1995, and National Council of Applied Research, New Delhi, India, December 26, 1996. We gratefully acknowledge that financial support for this research was received from grants partly funded by Wilfrid Laurier University (WLU) Operating funds, and partly by the SSHRC General Research Grant awarded to WLU. We also acknowledge helpful discussions with Pierre Perron. We have also benefited from comments of the participants at the conferences and faculty seminars, and two referees of this journal. The usual disclaimer for the remaining errors or misinterpretations applies.</affiliation><affiliation>Professor, Department of Economics, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Tex. Phone 1–214‐768‐3555, Fax 1–214‐768‐1821 E‐mail Dslottje@mail.smu.edu</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Economic Inquiry</title><idno type="pISSN">0095-2583</idno><idno type="eISSN">1465-7295</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1465-7295</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1999-04"></date><biblScope unit="volume">37</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="226">226</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="241">241</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">6A86ED23B02FDFE07EBF99E1F566CA9FCE017ED2</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1465-7295.1999.tb01427.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">ECIN226</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1999</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This paper provides a formal test of the null hypothesis of a unit root in the log‐level of labor productivity against the alternative of linear trend stationarity with a one‐time structural break in the level and slope of the trend at an a priori unknown date. Using some newly developed time series tests, we show that the log‐level of productivity is more accurately modeled as following a deterministic trend with a regime shift rather than as a unit root process. Some implications of the results for detrending and for testing cointegration relationships between productivity and other variables are discussed. (JEL C22. O40)</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1999-04">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api-v5.istex.fr/document/6A86ED23B02FDFE07EBF99E1F566CA9FCE017ED2/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1465-7295</doi><issn type="print">0095-2583</issn><issn type="electronic">1465-7295</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="ECIN"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="ECONOMIC INQUIRY">Economic Inquiry</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="04002"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/ecin.1999.37.issue-2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="37">37</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="1999-04">April 1999</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0022600" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1465-7295.1999.tb01427.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="ECIN226"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="16"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Article</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2007-07-02"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2007-07-02"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-03-05"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-19"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="226">226</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="241">241</numbering></numberingGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:ECIN.ECIN226.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="54"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="4"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">THE U.S. PRODUCTIVITY SLOWDOWN: A PEAK THROUGH THE STRUCTURAL BREAK WINDOW</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Jim</givenNames><familyName>Dolmas</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a2"><personName><givenNames>Baldev</givenNames><familyName>Raj</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a3" noteRef="#fn1"><personName><givenNames>Daniel J.</givenNames><familyName>Slottje</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1"><unparsedAffiliation> Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Tex.Phone 1–214‐768‐3806, Fax 1–214‐768‐1821 E‐mail <email>Jdolmas@maiI.smu.edu</email></unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a2" countryCode="CA"><unparsedAffiliation> Department of Economics, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, Phone 1–5 19‐884‐0710ext. 225, Fax 1–519‐884‐0201 E‐mail <email>braj@mach1.wlu.ca</email></unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="a3"><unparsedAffiliation> Professor, Department of Economics, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Tex. Phone 1–214‐768‐3555, Fax 1–214‐768‐1821 E‐mail <email>Dslottje@mail.smu.edu</email></unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p> <i>This paper provides a formal test of the null hypothesis of a unit root in the log‐level of labor productivity against the alternative of linear trend stationarity with a one‐time structural break in the level and slope of the trend at an a priori unknown date. Using some newly developed time series tests, we show that the log‐level of productivity is more accurately modeled as following a deterministic trend with a regime shift rather than as a unit root process. Some implications of the results for detrending and for testing cointegration relationships between productivity and other variables are discussed.</i> (<i>JEL</i> C22. O40)</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta><noteGroup><note xml:id="fn1" numbered="no"><p>*Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the Canadian Economics Association Meetings, Montreal, Canada, June 1995, the Australasian Meeting of the Econometric Society, Perth, Australia, July 1996, and the Camp Econometrics Texas, Port Aransas, Texas, USA, February 15–16, 1997. The paper was also presented at the faculty seminars of the Institute of Advanced Studies, Vienna, Austria, McMaster University and University of Windsor, Canada during 1995, and National Council of Applied Research, New Delhi, India, December 26, 1996. We gratefully acknowledge that financial support for this research was received from grants partly funded by Wilfrid Laurier University (WLU) Operating funds, and partly by the SSHRC General Research Grant awarded to WLU. We also acknowledge helpful discussions with Pierre Perron. We have also benefited from comments of the participants at the conferences and faculty seminars, and two referees of this journal. The usual disclaimer for the remaining errors or misinterpretations applies.</p></note></noteGroup></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>THE U.S. PRODUCTIVITY SLOWDOWN: A PEAK THROUGH THE STRUCTURAL BREAK WINDOW</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>THE U.S. PRODUCTIVITY SLOWDOWN: A PEAK THROUGH THE STRUCTURAL BREAK WINDOW</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Jim</namePart><namePart type="family">Dolmas</namePart><affiliation>Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Tex.Phone 1–214‐768‐3806, Fax 1–214‐768‐1821 E‐mail Jdolmas@maiI.smu.edu</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Baldev</namePart><namePart type="family">Raj</namePart><affiliation>Department of Economics, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, Phone 1–5 19‐884‐0710ext. 225, Fax 1–519‐884‐0201 E‐mail braj@mach1.wlu.ca</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Daniel J.</namePart><namePart type="family">Slottje</namePart><affiliation>Professor, Department of Economics, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Tex. Phone 1–214‐768‐3555, Fax 1–214‐768‐1821 E‐mail Dslottje@mail.smu.edu</affiliation><description>*Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the Canadian Economics Association Meetings, Montreal, Canada, June 1995, the Australasian Meeting of the Econometric Society, Perth, Australia, July 1996, and the Camp Econometrics Texas, Port Aransas, Texas, USA, February 15–16, 1997. The paper was also presented at the faculty seminars of the Institute of Advanced Studies, Vienna, Austria, McMaster University and University of Windsor, Canada during 1995, and National Council of Applied Research, New Delhi, India, December 26, 1996. We gratefully acknowledge that financial support for this research was received from grants partly funded by Wilfrid Laurier University (WLU) Operating funds, and partly by the SSHRC General Research Grant awarded to WLU. We also acknowledge helpful discussions with Pierre Perron. We have also benefited from comments of the participants at the conferences and faculty seminars, and two referees of this journal. The usual disclaimer for the remaining errors or misinterpretations applies.</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1999-04</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1999</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="references">54</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">This paper provides a formal test of the null hypothesis of a unit root in the log‐level of labor productivity against the alternative of linear trend stationarity with a one‐time structural break in the level and slope of the trend at an a priori unknown date. Using some newly developed time series tests, we show that the log‐level of productivity is more accurately modeled as following a deterministic trend with a regime shift rather than as a unit root process. Some implications of the results for detrending and for testing cointegration relationships between productivity and other variables are discussed. (JEL C22. O40)</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Economic Inquiry</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0095-2583</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1465-7295</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1465-7295</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">ECIN</identifier><part><date>1999</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>37</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>226</start><end>241</end><total>16</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">6A86ED23B02FDFE07EBF99E1F566CA9FCE017ED2</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1465-7295.1999.tb01427.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">ECIN226</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Canada/explor/ParkinsonCanadaV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002823 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002823 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Canada
|area= ParkinsonCanadaV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:6A86ED23B02FDFE07EBF99E1F566CA9FCE017ED2
|texte= THE U.S. PRODUCTIVITY SLOWDOWN: A PEAK THROUGH THE STRUCTURAL BREAK WINDOW
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.29. |  |