Differential responses of citrus calli and protoplasts to culture filtrate and toxin of Phoma tracheiphila
Identifieur interne : 000882 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000881; suivant : 000883Differential responses of citrus calli and protoplasts to culture filtrate and toxin of Phoma tracheiphila
Auteurs : A. Gentile ; E. Tribulato ; G. Continella ; A. VardiSource :
- Theoretical and Applied Genetics [ 0040-5752 ] ; 1992-04-01.
Abstract
Summary: Nucellar calli from two citrus cultivars with known tolerance to mal secco disease were chosen as experimental material, to test the pathogen's response to culture filtrate (CF) and partially purified toxin (PPT). The response of the two calli to the CF was in reverse order to the known response of the two cultivars to natural and artificial inoculations with Phoma tracheiphila. HPLC analysis of P. tracheiphila CF indicated the presence of a relatively high level of indole acetic acid (IAA). The response of the two calli and protoplasts derived from these calli to increasing amounts of IAA in the culture media was in the same order as that of calli and protoplasts to CF. In contrast, the responses to PPT of calli and protoplasts from these two types confirmed the relative tolerance of ‘Femminello’ lemon and ‘Tarocco’ orange trees to mal secco disease.
Url:
DOI: 10.1007/BF00226695
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:7C33FD1561A13D7B9A6A6FF949C786A84ABC15E3Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Differential responses of citrus calli and protoplasts to culture filtrate and toxin of Phoma tracheiphila</title><author><name sortKey="Gentile, A" sort="Gentile, A" uniqKey="Gentile A" first="A." last="Gentile">A. Gentile</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute of Coltivazioni arboree, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Tribulato, E" sort="Tribulato, E" uniqKey="Tribulato E" first="E." last="Tribulato">E. Tribulato</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute of Coltivazioni arboree, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Continella, G" sort="Continella, G" uniqKey="Continella G" first="G." last="Continella">G. Continella</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute of Coltivazioni arboree, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vardi, A" sort="Vardi, A" uniqKey="Vardi A" first="A." last="Vardi">A. Vardi</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute of Horticulture, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, 50250, Bet Dagan, Israel</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:7C33FD1561A13D7B9A6A6FF949C786A84ABC15E3</idno><date when="1992" year="1992">1992</date><idno type="doi">10.1007/BF00226695</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/7C33FD1561A13D7B9A6A6FF949C786A84ABC15E3/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000882</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Differential responses of citrus calli and protoplasts to culture filtrate and toxin of Phoma tracheiphila</title><author><name sortKey="Gentile, A" sort="Gentile, A" uniqKey="Gentile A" first="A." last="Gentile">A. Gentile</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute of Coltivazioni arboree, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Tribulato, E" sort="Tribulato, E" uniqKey="Tribulato E" first="E." last="Tribulato">E. Tribulato</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute of Coltivazioni arboree, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Continella, G" sort="Continella, G" uniqKey="Continella G" first="G." last="Continella">G. Continella</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute of Coltivazioni arboree, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Vardi, A" sort="Vardi, A" uniqKey="Vardi A" first="A." last="Vardi">A. Vardi</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Institute of Horticulture, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, 50250, Bet Dagan, Israel</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Theoretical and Applied Genetics</title><title level="j" type="sub">International Journal of Plant Breeding Research</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Theoret. Appl. Genetics</title><idno type="ISSN">0040-5752</idno><idno type="eISSN">1432-2242</idno><imprint><publisher>Springer-Verlag</publisher><pubPlace>Berlin/Heidelberg</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1992-04-01">1992-04-01</date><biblScope unit="volume">83</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6-7</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="759">759</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="764">764</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0040-5752</idno></series><idno type="istex">7C33FD1561A13D7B9A6A6FF949C786A84ABC15E3</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1007/BF00226695</idno><idno type="ArticleID">BF00226695</idno><idno type="ArticleID">Art14</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0040-5752</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Summary: Nucellar calli from two citrus cultivars with known tolerance to mal secco disease were chosen as experimental material, to test the pathogen's response to culture filtrate (CF) and partially purified toxin (PPT). The response of the two calli to the CF was in reverse order to the known response of the two cultivars to natural and artificial inoculations with Phoma tracheiphila. HPLC analysis of P. tracheiphila CF indicated the presence of a relatively high level of indole acetic acid (IAA). The response of the two calli and protoplasts derived from these calli to increasing amounts of IAA in the culture media was in the same order as that of calli and protoplasts to CF. In contrast, the responses to PPT of calli and protoplasts from these two types confirmed the relative tolerance of ‘Femminello’ lemon and ‘Tarocco’ orange trees to mal secco disease.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>springer</corpusName><author><json:item><name>A. Gentile</name><affiliations><json:string>Institute of Coltivazioni arboree, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>E. Tribulato</name><affiliations><json:string>Institute of Coltivazioni arboree, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>G. Continella</name><affiliations><json:string>Institute of Coltivazioni arboree, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>A. Vardi</name><affiliations><json:string>Institute of Horticulture, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, 50250, Bet Dagan, Israel</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>BF00226695</json:string><json:string>Art14</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>OriginalPaper</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Summary: Nucellar calli from two citrus cultivars with known tolerance to mal secco disease were chosen as experimental material, to test the pathogen's response to culture filtrate (CF) and partially purified toxin (PPT). The response of the two calli to the CF was in reverse order to the known response of the two cultivars to natural and artificial inoculations with Phoma tracheiphila. HPLC analysis of P. tracheiphila CF indicated the presence of a relatively high level of indole acetic acid (IAA). The response of the two calli and protoplasts derived from these calli to increasing amounts of IAA in the culture media was in the same order as that of calli and protoplasts to CF. In contrast, the responses to PPT of calli and protoplasts from these two types confirmed the relative tolerance of ‘Femminello’ lemon and ‘Tarocco’ orange trees to mal secco disease.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>5.696</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>595.64 x 785.64 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><keywordCount>0</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>872</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>3968</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>22456</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>6</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>144</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Differential responses of citrus calli and protoplasts to culture filtrate and toxin of Phoma tracheiphila</title><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><volume>83</volume><pages><last>764</last><first>759</first></pages><issn><json:string>0040-5752</json:string></issn><issue>6-7</issue><subject><json:item><value>Biotechnology</value></json:item><json:item><value>Agriculture</value></json:item><json:item><value>Biochemistry, general</value></json:item><json:item><value>Plant Biochemistry</value></json:item><json:item><value>Plant Sciences</value></json:item><json:item><value>Plant Genetics & Genomics</value></json:item></subject><journalId><json:string>122</json:string></journalId><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1432-2242</json:string></eissn><title>Theoretical and Applied Genetics</title><publicationDate>1992</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1992</copyrightDate></host><publicationDate>1992</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1992</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1007/BF00226695</json:string></doi><id>7C33FD1561A13D7B9A6A6FF949C786A84ABC15E3</id><score>0.29090106</score><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7C33FD1561A13D7B9A6A6FF949C786A84ABC15E3/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7C33FD1561A13D7B9A6A6FF949C786A84ABC15E3/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/7C33FD1561A13D7B9A6A6FF949C786A84ABC15E3/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Differential responses of citrus calli and protoplasts to culture filtrate and toxin of Phoma tracheiphila</title><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Springer-Verlag</publisher><pubPlace>Berlin/Heidelberg</pubPlace><availability><p>Springer-Verlag, 1992</p></availability><date>1991-05-10</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note>Originals</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Differential responses of citrus calli and protoplasts to culture filtrate and toxin of Phoma tracheiphila</title><author xml:id="author-1"><persName><forename type="first">A.</forename><surname>Gentile</surname></persName><affiliation>Institute of Coltivazioni arboree, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-2"><persName><forename type="first">E.</forename><surname>Tribulato</surname></persName><affiliation>Institute of Coltivazioni arboree, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-3"><persName><forename type="first">G.</forename><surname>Continella</surname></persName><affiliation>Institute of Coltivazioni arboree, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-4"><persName><forename type="first">A.</forename><surname>Vardi</surname></persName><affiliation>Institute of Horticulture, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, 50250, Bet Dagan, Israel</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Theoretical and Applied Genetics</title><title level="j" type="sub">International Journal of Plant Breeding Research</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Theoret. Appl. Genetics</title><idno type="journal-ID">122</idno><idno type="pISSN">0040-5752</idno><idno type="eISSN">1432-2242</idno><idno type="issue-article-count">37</idno><idno type="volume-issue-count">8</idno><imprint><publisher>Springer-Verlag</publisher><pubPlace>Berlin/Heidelberg</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1992-04-01"></date><biblScope unit="volume">83</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6-7</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="759">759</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="764">764</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">7C33FD1561A13D7B9A6A6FF949C786A84ABC15E3</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1007/BF00226695</idno><idno type="ArticleID">BF00226695</idno><idno type="ArticleID">Art14</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1991-05-10</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Summary: Nucellar calli from two citrus cultivars with known tolerance to mal secco disease were chosen as experimental material, to test the pathogen's response to culture filtrate (CF) and partially purified toxin (PPT). The response of the two calli to the CF was in reverse order to the known response of the two cultivars to natural and artificial inoculations with Phoma tracheiphila. HPLC analysis of P. tracheiphila CF indicated the presence of a relatively high level of indole acetic acid (IAA). The response of the two calli and protoplasts derived from these calli to increasing amounts of IAA in the culture media was in the same order as that of calli and protoplasts to CF. In contrast, the responses to PPT of calli and protoplasts from these two types confirmed the relative tolerance of ‘Femminello’ lemon and ‘Tarocco’ orange trees to mal secco disease.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="Journal Subject"><list><head>Life Sciences</head><item><term>Biotechnology</term></item><item><term>Agriculture</term></item><item><term>Biochemistry, general</term></item><item><term>Plant Biochemistry</term></item><item><term>Plant Sciences</term></item><item><term>Plant Genetics & Genomics</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1991-05-10">Created</change><change when="1992-04-01">Published</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2016-09-22">References added</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7C33FD1561A13D7B9A6A6FF949C786A84ABC15E3/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Springer, Publisher found" wicri:toSee="no header"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//Springer-Verlag//DTD A++ V2.4//EN" URI="http://devel.springer.de/A++/V2.4/DTD/A++V2.4.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><Publisher><PublisherInfo><PublisherName>Springer-Verlag</PublisherName><PublisherLocation>Berlin/Heidelberg</PublisherLocation></PublisherInfo><Journal><JournalInfo JournalProductType="ArchiveJournal" NumberingStyle="Unnumbered"><JournalID>122</JournalID><JournalPrintISSN>0040-5752</JournalPrintISSN><JournalElectronicISSN>1432-2242</JournalElectronicISSN><JournalTitle>Theoretical and Applied Genetics</JournalTitle><JournalSubTitle>International Journal of Plant Breeding Research</JournalSubTitle><JournalAbbreviatedTitle>Theoret. Appl. Genetics</JournalAbbreviatedTitle><JournalSubjectGroup><JournalSubject Type="Primary">Life Sciences</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Biotechnology</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Agriculture</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Biochemistry, general</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Plant Biochemistry</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Plant Sciences</JournalSubject><JournalSubject Type="Secondary">Plant Genetics & Genomics</JournalSubject></JournalSubjectGroup></JournalInfo><Volume><VolumeInfo VolumeType="Combined" TocLevels="0"><VolumeIDStart>83</VolumeIDStart><VolumeIDEnd>83</VolumeIDEnd><VolumeIssueCount>8</VolumeIssueCount></VolumeInfo><Issue IssueType="Combined"><IssueInfo TocLevels="0"><IssueIDStart>6</IssueIDStart><IssueIDEnd>7</IssueIDEnd><IssueArticleCount>37</IssueArticleCount><IssueHistory><CoverDate><Year>1992</Year><Month>4</Month></CoverDate></IssueHistory><IssueCopyright><CopyrightHolderName>Springer-Verlag</CopyrightHolderName><CopyrightYear>1992</CopyrightYear></IssueCopyright></IssueInfo><Article ID="Art14"><ArticleInfo Language="En" ArticleType="OriginalPaper" NumberingStyle="Unnumbered" TocLevels="0" ContainsESM="No"><ArticleID>BF00226695</ArticleID><ArticleDOI>10.1007/BF00226695</ArticleDOI><ArticleSequenceNumber>14</ArticleSequenceNumber><ArticleTitle Language="En">Differential responses of citrus calli and protoplasts to culture filtrate and toxin of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Phoma tracheiphila</Emphasis></ArticleTitle><ArticleCategory>Originals</ArticleCategory><ArticleFirstPage>759</ArticleFirstPage><ArticleLastPage>764</ArticleLastPage><ArticleHistory><RegistrationDate><Year>2004</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>23</Day></RegistrationDate><Received><Year>1991</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>10</Day></Received><Accepted><Year>1991</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>9</Day></Accepted></ArticleHistory><ArticleCopyright><CopyrightHolderName>Springer-Verlag</CopyrightHolderName><CopyrightYear>1992</CopyrightYear></ArticleCopyright><ArticleGrants Type="Regular"><MetadataGrant Grant="OpenAccess"></MetadataGrant><AbstractGrant Grant="OpenAccess"></AbstractGrant><BodyPDFGrant Grant="Restricted"></BodyPDFGrant><BodyHTMLGrant Grant="Restricted"></BodyHTMLGrant><BibliographyGrant Grant="Restricted"></BibliographyGrant><ESMGrant Grant="Restricted"></ESMGrant></ArticleGrants><ArticleContext><JournalID>122</JournalID><VolumeIDStart>83</VolumeIDStart><VolumeIDEnd>83</VolumeIDEnd><IssueIDStart>6</IssueIDStart><IssueIDEnd>7</IssueIDEnd></ArticleContext></ArticleInfo><ArticleHeader><AuthorGroup><Author AffiliationIDS="Aff1"><AuthorName DisplayOrder="Western"><GivenName>A.</GivenName><FamilyName>Gentile</FamilyName></AuthorName></Author><Author AffiliationIDS="Aff1"><AuthorName DisplayOrder="Western"><GivenName>E.</GivenName><FamilyName>Tribulato</FamilyName></AuthorName></Author><Author AffiliationIDS="Aff1"><AuthorName DisplayOrder="Western"><GivenName>G.</GivenName><FamilyName>Continella</FamilyName></AuthorName></Author><Author AffiliationIDS="Aff2"><AuthorName DisplayOrder="Western"><GivenName>A.</GivenName><FamilyName>Vardi</FamilyName></AuthorName></Author><Affiliation ID="Aff1"><OrgDivision>Institute of Coltivazioni arboree</OrgDivision><OrgName>University of Catania</OrgName><OrgAddress><Postcode>95123</Postcode><City>Catania</City><Country>Italy</Country></OrgAddress></Affiliation><Affiliation ID="Aff2"><OrgDivision>Institute of Horticulture, Agricultural Research Organization</OrgDivision><OrgName>The Volcani Center</OrgName><OrgAddress><Postcode>50250</Postcode><City>Bet Dagan</City><Country>Israel</Country></OrgAddress></Affiliation></AuthorGroup><Abstract ID="Abs1" Language="En"><Heading>Summary</Heading><Para>Nucellar calli from two citrus cultivars with known tolerance to mal secco disease were chosen as experimental material, to test the pathogen's response to culture filtrate (CF) and partially purified toxin (PPT). The response of the two calli to the CF was in reverse order to the known response of the two cultivars to natural and artificial inoculations with <Emphasis Type="Italic">Phoma tracheiphila</Emphasis>. HPLC analysis of <Emphasis Type="Italic">P. tracheiphila</Emphasis> CF indicated the presence of a relatively high level of indole acetic acid (IAA). The response of the two calli and protoplasts derived from these calli to increasing amounts of IAA in the culture media was in the same order as that of calli and protoplasts to CF. In contrast, the responses to PPT of calli and protoplasts from these two types confirmed the relative tolerance of ‘Femminello’ lemon and ‘Tarocco’ orange trees to mal secco disease.</Para></Abstract><KeywordGroup Language="En"><Heading>Key words</Heading><Keyword><Emphasis Type="Italic">Citrus</Emphasis></Keyword><Keyword>In vitro selection</Keyword><Keyword>Lemon</Keyword><Keyword><Emphasis Type="Italic">Phoma tracheiphila</Emphasis></Keyword><Keyword>Phytotoxin</Keyword></KeywordGroup><ArticleNote Type="CommunicatedBy"><SimplePara>Communicated by G. Wenzel</SimplePara></ArticleNote><ArticleNote Type="Misc"><SimplePara>Contribution from the Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel. No. 3248-E, 1991 series</SimplePara></ArticleNote></ArticleHeader><NoBody></NoBody></Article></Issue></Volume></Journal></Publisher></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Differential responses of citrus calli and protoplasts to culture filtrate and toxin of Phoma tracheiphila</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Differential responses of citrus calli and protoplasts to culture filtrate and toxin of Phoma tracheiphila</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">A.</namePart><namePart type="family">Gentile</namePart><affiliation>Institute of Coltivazioni arboree, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">E.</namePart><namePart type="family">Tribulato</namePart><affiliation>Institute of Coltivazioni arboree, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">G.</namePart><namePart type="family">Continella</namePart><affiliation>Institute of Coltivazioni arboree, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">A.</namePart><namePart type="family">Vardi</namePart><affiliation>Institute of Horticulture, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, 50250, Bet Dagan, Israel</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="OriginalPaper"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Springer-Verlag</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Berlin/Heidelberg</placeTerm></place><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">1991-05-10</dateCreated><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1992-04-01</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1992</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Summary: Nucellar calli from two citrus cultivars with known tolerance to mal secco disease were chosen as experimental material, to test the pathogen's response to culture filtrate (CF) and partially purified toxin (PPT). The response of the two calli to the CF was in reverse order to the known response of the two cultivars to natural and artificial inoculations with Phoma tracheiphila. HPLC analysis of P. tracheiphila CF indicated the presence of a relatively high level of indole acetic acid (IAA). The response of the two calli and protoplasts derived from these calli to increasing amounts of IAA in the culture media was in the same order as that of calli and protoplasts to CF. In contrast, the responses to PPT of calli and protoplasts from these two types confirmed the relative tolerance of ‘Femminello’ lemon and ‘Tarocco’ orange trees to mal secco disease.</abstract><note>Originals</note><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Theoretical and Applied Genetics</title><subTitle>International Journal of Plant Breeding Research</subTitle></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Theoret. Appl. Genetics</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" displayLabel="Archive Journal"></genre><originInfo><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1992-04-01</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1992</copyrightDate></originInfo><subject><genre>Life Sciences</genre><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Biochemistry, general</topic><topic>Plant Biochemistry</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Plant Genetics & Genomics</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0040-5752</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1432-2242</identifier><identifier type="JournalID">122</identifier><identifier type="IssueArticleCount">37</identifier><identifier type="VolumeIssueCount">8</identifier><part><date>1992</date><detail type="volume"><number>83</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>6-7</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>759</start><end>764</end></extent></part><recordInfo><recordOrigin>Springer-Verlag, 1992</recordOrigin></recordInfo></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">7C33FD1561A13D7B9A6A6FF949C786A84ABC15E3</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1007/BF00226695</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">BF00226695</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">Art14</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Springer-Verlag, 1992</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>SPRINGER</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Springer-Verlag, 1992</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><enrichments><json:item><type>multicat</type><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7C33FD1561A13D7B9A6A6FF949C786A84ABC15E3/enrichments/multicat</uri></json:item><json:item><type>refBibs</type><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/7C33FD1561A13D7B9A6A6FF949C786A84ABC15E3/enrichments/refBibs</uri></json:item></enrichments><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Bois/explor/OrangerV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000882 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000882 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Bois
|area= OrangerV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:7C33FD1561A13D7B9A6A6FF949C786A84ABC15E3
|texte= Differential responses of citrus calli and protoplasts to culture filtrate and toxin of Phoma tracheiphila
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25. |  |