Links to Exploration step
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The acceptability of reuse of the female condom among urban South African women</title><author><name sortKey="Pettifor, Audrey E" sort="Pettifor, Audrey E" uniqKey="Pettifor A" first="Audrey E." last="Pettifor">Audrey E. Pettifor</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff1">Reproductive Health Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Addington Hospital, PO 38084, 4069 Point, Durban South Africa</nlm:aff></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff2">Reproductive Health Research Unit at the University of California, Berkeley,</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Beksinska, Mags E" sort="Beksinska, Mags E" uniqKey="Beksinska M" first="Mags E." last="Beksinska">Mags E. Beksinska</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff1">Reproductive Health Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Addington Hospital, PO 38084, 4069 Point, Durban South Africa</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Rees, Helen V" sort="Rees, Helen V" uniqKey="Rees H" first="Helen V." last="Rees">Helen V. Rees</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff1">Reproductive Health Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Addington Hospital, PO 38084, 4069 Point, Durban South Africa</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mqoqi, Nokuzola" sort="Mqoqi, Nokuzola" uniqKey="Mqoqi N" first="Nokuzola" last="Mqoqi">Nokuzola Mqoqi</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff1">Reproductive Health Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Addington Hospital, PO 38084, 4069 Point, Durban South Africa</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Dickson Tettell, Kim E" sort="Dickson Tettell, Kim E" uniqKey="Dickson Tettell K" first="Kim E." last="Dickson-Tettell">Kim E. Dickson-Tettell</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff1">Reproductive Health Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Addington Hospital, PO 38084, 4069 Point, Durban South Africa</nlm:aff></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">11796811</idno><idno type="pmc">3455880</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3455880</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:3455880</idno><idno type="doi">10.1093/jurban/78.4.647</idno><date when="2001">2001</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000508</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">000508</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">The acceptability of reuse of the female condom among urban South African women</title><author><name sortKey="Pettifor, Audrey E" sort="Pettifor, Audrey E" uniqKey="Pettifor A" first="Audrey E." last="Pettifor">Audrey E. Pettifor</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff1">Reproductive Health Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Addington Hospital, PO 38084, 4069 Point, Durban South Africa</nlm:aff></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff2">Reproductive Health Research Unit at the University of California, Berkeley,</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Beksinska, Mags E" sort="Beksinska, Mags E" uniqKey="Beksinska M" first="Mags E." last="Beksinska">Mags E. Beksinska</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff1">Reproductive Health Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Addington Hospital, PO 38084, 4069 Point, Durban South Africa</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Rees, Helen V" sort="Rees, Helen V" uniqKey="Rees H" first="Helen V." last="Rees">Helen V. Rees</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff1">Reproductive Health Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Addington Hospital, PO 38084, 4069 Point, Durban South Africa</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mqoqi, Nokuzola" sort="Mqoqi, Nokuzola" uniqKey="Mqoqi N" first="Nokuzola" last="Mqoqi">Nokuzola Mqoqi</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff1">Reproductive Health Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Addington Hospital, PO 38084, 4069 Point, Durban South Africa</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Dickson Tettell, Kim E" sort="Dickson Tettell, Kim E" uniqKey="Dickson Tettell K" first="Kim E." last="Dickson-Tettell">Kim E. Dickson-Tettell</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff1">Reproductive Health Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Addington Hospital, PO 38084, 4069 Point, Durban South Africa</nlm:aff></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine</title><idno type="ISSN">1099-3460</idno><idno type="eISSN">1468-2869</idno><imprint><date when="2001">2001</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p>This study assessed whether reuse of the female condom was acceptable among two groups of women in central Johannesburg, South Africa, who were taking part in two separate studies of female condom reuse. The first group consisted of women (aged 17 to 43years) attending a family planning/sexually transmitted infections (STIs) clinic who were participating in a cross-sectional survey of the acceptability of female condoms reuse (n=100). The second group included women (aged 18–40 years) at high risk for STI (80% self-declared sex workers) who were taking part in an ongoing cohort study to investigate the safety of reuse of the female condom through a structural integrity and microbial retention study (n=50). Among women participating in the acceptability study, 83% said that they would be willing to reuse the female condom, and 91% thought the idea of reuse, of the female condom was acceptable. All women taking part in the safety of reuse study and who reused the female condom up to seven time (n=49) reported that the steps involved in reusing the device were easy to perform and acceptable. All 49 women said they would reuse the female condom at least once, while 45% said they would use it a maximum of seven or eight times. From the results of the interviews with both study groups, it can be concluded that, among women in a South African urban environment who have used a male and/or female condom, the concept of reuse of the female condom is acceptable and thought to be a good idea.</p></div></front></TEI><pmc article-type="research-article"><pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">J Urban Health</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">J Urban Health</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1099-3460</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1468-2869</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Springer-Verlag</publisher-name><publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">11796811</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">3455880</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">60</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jurban/78.4.647</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Special Feature: Female-Initiated Methods of STI/HIV Prevention</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>The acceptability of reuse of the female condom among urban South African women</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Pettifor</surname><given-names>Audrey E.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff2">2</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Beksinska</surname><given-names>Mags E.</given-names></name><address><email>mags@rhru.co.za</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Rees</surname><given-names>Helen V.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Mqoqi</surname><given-names>Nokuzola</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Dickson-Tettell</surname><given-names>Kim E.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff1">1</xref></contrib><aff id="Aff2"><label>2</label>Reproductive Health Research Unit at the University of California, Berkeley,</aff><aff id="Aff3"><label>3</label>Department of Epidemiology at the University of California, Berkeley,</aff><aff id="Aff1"><label>1</label>Reproductive Health Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Addington Hospital, PO 38084, 4069 Point, Durban South Africa</aff></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>12</month><year>2001</year></pub-date><volume>78</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>647</fpage><lpage>657</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>© The New York Academy of Medicine 2001</copyright-statement></permissions><abstract id="Abs1"><p>This study assessed whether reuse of the female condom was acceptable among two groups of women in central Johannesburg, South Africa, who were taking part in two separate studies of female condom reuse. The first group consisted of women (aged 17 to 43years) attending a family planning/sexually transmitted infections (STIs) clinic who were participating in a cross-sectional survey of the acceptability of female condoms reuse (n=100). The second group included women (aged 18–40 years) at high risk for STI (80% self-declared sex workers) who were taking part in an ongoing cohort study to investigate the safety of reuse of the female condom through a structural integrity and microbial retention study (n=50). Among women participating in the acceptability study, 83% said that they would be willing to reuse the female condom, and 91% thought the idea of reuse, of the female condom was acceptable. All women taking part in the safety of reuse study and who reused the female condom up to seven time (n=49) reported that the steps involved in reusing the device were easy to perform and acceptable. All 49 women said they would reuse the female condom at least once, while 45% said they would use it a maximum of seven or eight times. From the results of the interviews with both study groups, it can be concluded that, among women in a South African urban environment who have used a male and/or female condom, the concept of reuse of the female condom is acceptable and thought to be a good idea.</p></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><title>Keywords</title><kwd>Acceptability</kwd><kwd>Female condom</kwd><kwd>Reuse</kwd><kwd>South Africa</kwd></kwd-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>issue-copyright-statement</meta-name><meta-value>© The New York Academy of Medicine 2001</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front></pmc></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/SidaSubSaharaV1/Data/Pmc/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000508 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000508 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Sante
|area= SidaSubSaharaV1
|flux= Pmc
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé=
|texte=
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |