Family Planning Providers' Perspectives On Dual Protection
Identifieur interne : 000361 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000360; suivant : 000362Family Planning Providers' Perspectives On Dual Protection
Auteurs : Joanne E. Mantell ; Susie Hoffman ; Theresa M. Exner ; Zena A. Stein ; Kim AtkinsSource :
- Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health [ 1538-6341 ] ; 2003-03.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Abdool karim, American journal, Barrier methods, Cates, Clinic, Community healthcare network, Condom, Contraception, Contraceptive, Contraceptive methods, Dual protection, Emergency contraception, Family planning, Family planning clients, Family planning clinics, Family planning perspectives, Family planning providers, Family planning services, Female condom, Female condoms, Good candidate, Good candidates, Hormonal, Hormonal methods, International family planning perspectives, Last resort, Male condom, Male condoms, Mantell, Many women, Other options, Pregnancy, Pregnancy prevention, Pregnancy risk, Primary method, Provider, Providers need training, Reproductive, Reproductive health, Risk assessment, Several providers, Spermicide, Std, Unintended, Unintended pregnancy.
- Teeft :
- Abdool karim, American journal, Barrier methods, Cates, Clinic, Community healthcare network, Condom, Contraception, Contraceptive, Contraceptive methods, Dual protection, Emergency contraception, Family planning, Family planning clients, Family planning clinics, Family planning perspectives, Family planning providers, Family planning services, Female condom, Female condoms, Good candidate, Good candidates, Hormonal, Hormonal methods, International family planning perspectives, Last resort, Male condom, Male condoms, Mantell, Many women, Other options, Pregnancy, Pregnancy prevention, Pregnancy risk, Primary method, Provider, Providers need training, Reproductive, Reproductive health, Risk assessment, Several providers, Spermicide, Std, Unintended, Unintended pregnancy.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Family planning providers can play an important role in helping women to identify their risk of HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and to adopt preventive measures. In‐depth investigation of providers' attitudes about approaches to STD risk assessment, contraceptive counseling and dual protection–concurrent protection from STDs and unintended pregnancy–has been limited. METHODS: In semistructured interviews conducted in 1998, 22 health care providers from a large New York City agency offering contraceptive and STD services described how they balanced STD and pregnancy concerns, viewed risk assessment and assessed various contraceptive methods. RESULTS: STD prevention was seen as an integral part of family planning counseling, and most providers believed that risk assessment should be conducted universally. Providers viewed dual protection as use of condoms along with an effective contraceptive; few advocated use of the male or female condom alone. The female condom was believed to be a disease prevention method of last resort and was considered appropriate only for specific groups of women. Although providers lacked understanding about the effectiveness of the female condom and how to counsel clients concerning its use, they expressed interest in learning more. CONCLUSIONS: Training is needed to reduce providers' negative perceptions of the female condom and to reinforce the importance of individualized counseling tailored to women's specific circumstances. Studies are needed on how to encourage family planning providers to promote male and female condoms as effective contraceptive methods.
Url:
DOI: 10.1363/3507103
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:0CA2DDF15D41B129135370F9DD0613B317DB0AEELe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Family Planning Providers' Perspectives On Dual Protection</title><author><name sortKey="Mantell, Joanne E" sort="Mantell, Joanne E" uniqKey="Mantell J" first="Joanne E." last="Mantell">Joanne E. Mantell</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Joanne E. Mantell, Susie Hoffman and Theresa M. Exner are research scientists, and at the time of the study, Zena A. Stein was codirector, all at the HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York. Kim Atkins is senior vice resident, Community Healthcare Network, New York.</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: jmantell@cnvlz.com</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hoffman, Susie" sort="Hoffman, Susie" uniqKey="Hoffman S" first="Susie" last="Hoffman">Susie Hoffman</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Joanne E. Mantell, Susie Hoffman and Theresa M. Exner are research scientists, and at the time of the study, Zena A. Stein was codirector, all at the HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York. Kim Atkins is senior vice resident, Community Healthcare Network, New York.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Exner, Theresa M" sort="Exner, Theresa M" uniqKey="Exner T" first="Theresa M." last="Exner">Theresa M. Exner</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Joanne E. Mantell, Susie Hoffman and Theresa M. Exner are research scientists, and at the time of the study, Zena A. Stein was codirector, all at the HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York. Kim Atkins is senior vice resident, Community Healthcare Network, New York.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Stein, Zena A" sort="Stein, Zena A" uniqKey="Stein Z" first="Zena A." last="Stein">Zena A. Stein</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Joanne E. Mantell, Susie Hoffman and Theresa M. Exner are research scientists, and at the time of the study, Zena A. Stein was codirector, all at the HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York. Kim Atkins is senior vice resident, Community Healthcare Network, New York.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Atkins, Kim" sort="Atkins, Kim" uniqKey="Atkins K" first="Kim" last="Atkins">Kim Atkins</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Joanne E. Mantell, Susie Hoffman and Theresa M. Exner are research scientists, and at the time of the study, Zena A. Stein was codirector, all at the HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York. Kim Atkins is senior vice resident, Community Healthcare Network, New York.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:0CA2DDF15D41B129135370F9DD0613B317DB0AEE</idno><date when="2003" year="2003">2003</date><idno type="doi">10.1363/3507103</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/0CA2DDF15D41B129135370F9DD0613B317DB0AEE/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000361</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000361</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Family Planning Providers' Perspectives On Dual Protection</title><author><name sortKey="Mantell, Joanne E" sort="Mantell, Joanne E" uniqKey="Mantell J" first="Joanne E." last="Mantell">Joanne E. Mantell</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Joanne E. Mantell, Susie Hoffman and Theresa M. Exner are research scientists, and at the time of the study, Zena A. Stein was codirector, all at the HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York. Kim Atkins is senior vice resident, Community Healthcare Network, New York.</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: jmantell@cnvlz.com</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Hoffman, Susie" sort="Hoffman, Susie" uniqKey="Hoffman S" first="Susie" last="Hoffman">Susie Hoffman</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Joanne E. Mantell, Susie Hoffman and Theresa M. Exner are research scientists, and at the time of the study, Zena A. Stein was codirector, all at the HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York. Kim Atkins is senior vice resident, Community Healthcare Network, New York.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Exner, Theresa M" sort="Exner, Theresa M" uniqKey="Exner T" first="Theresa M." last="Exner">Theresa M. Exner</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Joanne E. Mantell, Susie Hoffman and Theresa M. Exner are research scientists, and at the time of the study, Zena A. Stein was codirector, all at the HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York. Kim Atkins is senior vice resident, Community Healthcare Network, New York.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Stein, Zena A" sort="Stein, Zena A" uniqKey="Stein Z" first="Zena A." last="Stein">Zena A. Stein</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Joanne E. Mantell, Susie Hoffman and Theresa M. Exner are research scientists, and at the time of the study, Zena A. Stein was codirector, all at the HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York. Kim Atkins is senior vice resident, Community Healthcare Network, New York.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Atkins, Kim" sort="Atkins, Kim" uniqKey="Atkins K" first="Kim" last="Atkins">Kim Atkins</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Joanne E. Mantell, Susie Hoffman and Theresa M. Exner are research scientists, and at the time of the study, Zena A. Stein was codirector, all at the HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York. Kim Atkins is senior vice resident, Community Healthcare Network, New York.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health</title><title level="j" type="alt">PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH</title><idno type="ISSN">1538-6341</idno><idno type="eISSN">1931-2393</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">35</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="71">71</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="78">78</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2003-03">2003-03</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1538-6341</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1538-6341</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abdool karim</term><term>American journal</term><term>Barrier methods</term><term>Cates</term><term>Clinic</term><term>Community healthcare network</term><term>Condom</term><term>Contraception</term><term>Contraceptive</term><term>Contraceptive methods</term><term>Dual protection</term><term>Emergency contraception</term><term>Family planning</term><term>Family planning clients</term><term>Family planning clinics</term><term>Family planning perspectives</term><term>Family planning providers</term><term>Family planning services</term><term>Female condom</term><term>Female condoms</term><term>Good candidate</term><term>Good candidates</term><term>Hormonal</term><term>Hormonal methods</term><term>International family planning perspectives</term><term>Last resort</term><term>Male condom</term><term>Male condoms</term><term>Mantell</term><term>Many women</term><term>Other options</term><term>Pregnancy</term><term>Pregnancy prevention</term><term>Pregnancy risk</term><term>Primary method</term><term>Provider</term><term>Providers need training</term><term>Reproductive</term><term>Reproductive health</term><term>Risk assessment</term><term>Several providers</term><term>Spermicide</term><term>Std</term><term>Unintended</term><term>Unintended pregnancy</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abdool karim</term><term>American journal</term><term>Barrier methods</term><term>Cates</term><term>Clinic</term><term>Community healthcare network</term><term>Condom</term><term>Contraception</term><term>Contraceptive</term><term>Contraceptive methods</term><term>Dual protection</term><term>Emergency contraception</term><term>Family planning</term><term>Family planning clients</term><term>Family planning clinics</term><term>Family planning perspectives</term><term>Family planning providers</term><term>Family planning services</term><term>Female condom</term><term>Female condoms</term><term>Good candidate</term><term>Good candidates</term><term>Hormonal</term><term>Hormonal methods</term><term>International family planning perspectives</term><term>Last resort</term><term>Male condom</term><term>Male condoms</term><term>Mantell</term><term>Many women</term><term>Other options</term><term>Pregnancy</term><term>Pregnancy prevention</term><term>Pregnancy risk</term><term>Primary method</term><term>Provider</term><term>Providers need training</term><term>Reproductive</term><term>Reproductive health</term><term>Risk assessment</term><term>Several providers</term><term>Spermicide</term><term>Std</term><term>Unintended</term><term>Unintended pregnancy</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">CONTEXT: Family planning providers can play an important role in helping women to identify their risk of HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and to adopt preventive measures. In‐depth investigation of providers' attitudes about approaches to STD risk assessment, contraceptive counseling and dual protection–concurrent protection from STDs and unintended pregnancy–has been limited. METHODS: In semistructured interviews conducted in 1998, 22 health care providers from a large New York City agency offering contraceptive and STD services described how they balanced STD and pregnancy concerns, viewed risk assessment and assessed various contraceptive methods. RESULTS: STD prevention was seen as an integral part of family planning counseling, and most providers believed that risk assessment should be conducted universally. Providers viewed dual protection as use of condoms along with an effective contraceptive; few advocated use of the male or female condom alone. The female condom was believed to be a disease prevention method of last resort and was considered appropriate only for specific groups of women. Although providers lacked understanding about the effectiveness of the female condom and how to counsel clients concerning its use, they expressed interest in learning more. CONCLUSIONS: Training is needed to reduce providers' negative perceptions of the female condom and to reinforce the importance of individualized counseling tailored to women's specific circumstances. Studies are needed on how to encourage family planning providers to promote male and female condoms as effective contraceptive methods.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><keywords><teeft><json:string>provider</json:string><json:string>condom</json:string><json:string>female condom</json:string><json:string>dual protection</json:string><json:string>std</json:string><json:string>risk assessment</json:string><json:string>family planning providers</json:string><json:string>family planning</json:string><json:string>contraceptive</json:string><json:string>hormonal</json:string><json:string>family planning perspectives</json:string><json:string>emergency contraception</json:string><json:string>male condom</json:string><json:string>spermicide</json:string><json:string>unintended pregnancy</json:string><json:string>cates</json:string><json:string>reproductive</json:string><json:string>reproductive health</json:string><json:string>mantell</json:string><json:string>hormonal methods</json:string><json:string>male condoms</json:string><json:string>pregnancy</json:string><json:string>abdool karim</json:string><json:string>family planning clients</json:string><json:string>international family planning perspectives</json:string><json:string>pregnancy prevention</json:string><json:string>community healthcare network</json:string><json:string>female condoms</json:string><json:string>family planning clinics</json:string><json:string>american journal</json:string><json:string>good candidates</json:string><json:string>other options</json:string><json:string>many women</json:string><json:string>pregnancy risk</json:string><json:string>contraceptive methods</json:string><json:string>primary method</json:string><json:string>several providers</json:string><json:string>family planning services</json:string><json:string>last resort</json:string><json:string>providers need training</json:string><json:string>barrier methods</json:string><json:string>good candidate</json:string><json:string>unintended</json:string><json:string>clinic</json:string><json:string>contraception</json:string></teeft></keywords><author><json:item><name>Joanne E. Mantell</name><affiliations><json:string>Joanne E. Mantell, Susie Hoffman and Theresa M. Exner are research scientists, and at the time of the study, Zena A. Stein was codirector, all at the HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York. Kim Atkins is senior vice resident, Community Healthcare Network, New York.</json:string><json:string>E-mail: jmantell@cnvlz.com</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Susie Hoffman</name><affiliations><json:string>Joanne E. Mantell, Susie Hoffman and Theresa M. Exner are research scientists, and at the time of the study, Zena A. Stein was codirector, all at the HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York. Kim Atkins is senior vice resident, Community Healthcare Network, New York.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Theresa M. Exner</name><affiliations><json:string>Joanne E. Mantell, Susie Hoffman and Theresa M. Exner are research scientists, and at the time of the study, Zena A. Stein was codirector, all at the HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York. Kim Atkins is senior vice resident, Community Healthcare Network, New York.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Zena A. Stein</name><affiliations><json:string>Joanne E. Mantell, Susie Hoffman and Theresa M. Exner are research scientists, and at the time of the study, Zena A. Stein was codirector, all at the HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York. Kim Atkins is senior vice resident, Community Healthcare Network, New York.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Kim Atkins</name><affiliations><json:string>Joanne E. Mantell, Susie Hoffman and Theresa M. Exner are research scientists, and at the time of the study, Zena A. Stein was codirector, all at the HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York. Kim Atkins is senior vice resident, Community Healthcare Network, New York.</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>PSRH71</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>CONTEXT: Family planning providers can play an important role in helping women to identify their risk of HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and to adopt preventive measures. In‐depth investigation of providers' attitudes about approaches to STD risk assessment, contraceptive counseling and dual protection–concurrent protection from STDs and unintended pregnancy–has been limited. METHODS: In semistructured interviews conducted in 1998, 22 health care providers from a large New York City agency offering contraceptive and STD services described how they balanced STD and pregnancy concerns, viewed risk assessment and assessed various contraceptive methods. RESULTS: STD prevention was seen as an integral part of family planning counseling, and most providers believed that risk assessment should be conducted universally. Providers viewed dual protection as use of condoms along with an effective contraceptive; few advocated use of the male or female condom alone. The female condom was believed to be a disease prevention method of last resort and was considered appropriate only for specific groups of women. Although providers lacked understanding about the effectiveness of the female condom and how to counsel clients concerning its use, they expressed interest in learning more. CONCLUSIONS: Training is needed to reduce providers' negative perceptions of the female condom and to reinforce the importance of individualized counseling tailored to women's specific circumstances. Studies are needed on how to encourage family planning providers to promote male and female condoms as effective contraceptive methods.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.308</score><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>612 x 792 pts (letter)</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><abstractCharCount>1642</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>6865</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>43048</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>8</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>234</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Family Planning Providers' Perspectives On Dual Protection</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><title>Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health</title><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1931-2393</json:string></doi><issn><json:string>1538-6341</json:string></issn><eissn><json:string>1931-2393</json:string></eissn><publisherId><json:string>PSRH</json:string></publisherId><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><pages><first>71</first><last>78</last><total>8</total></pages><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre></host><categories><wos><json:string>social science</json:string><json:string>family studies</json:string><json:string>demography</json:string></wos><scienceMetrix><json:string>health sciences</json:string><json:string>public health & health services</json:string><json:string>public health</json:string></scienceMetrix><inist><json:string>sciences humaines et sociales</json:string></inist></categories><publicationDate>2003</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2003</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1363/3507103</json:string></doi><id>0CA2DDF15D41B129135370F9DD0613B317DB0AEE</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><extension>pdf</extension><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0CA2DDF15D41B129135370F9DD0613B317DB0AEE/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><extension>zip</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0CA2DDF15D41B129135370F9DD0613B317DB0AEE/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/0CA2DDF15D41B129135370F9DD0613B317DB0AEE/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main">Family Planning Providers' Perspectives On Dual Protection</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2003-03"></date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note><note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="article"><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Family Planning Providers' Perspectives On Dual Protection</title><author xml:id="author-0000" role="corresp"><persName><forename type="first">Joanne E.</forename><surname>Mantell</surname></persName><affiliation>Joanne E. Mantell, Susie Hoffman and Theresa M. Exner are research scientists, and at the time of the study, Zena A. Stein was codirector, all at the HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York. Kim Atkins is senior vice resident, Community Healthcare Network, New York.<address><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation><affiliation>Author contact: jmantell@cnvlz.com</affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0001"><persName><forename type="first">Susie</forename><surname>Hoffman</surname></persName><affiliation>Joanne E. Mantell, Susie Hoffman and Theresa M. Exner are research scientists, and at the time of the study, Zena A. Stein was codirector, all at the HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York. Kim Atkins is senior vice resident, Community Healthcare Network, New York.<address><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0002"><persName><forename type="first">Theresa M.</forename><surname>Exner</surname></persName><affiliation>Joanne E. Mantell, Susie Hoffman and Theresa M. Exner are research scientists, and at the time of the study, Zena A. Stein was codirector, all at the HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York. Kim Atkins is senior vice resident, Community Healthcare Network, New York.<address><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0003"><persName><forename type="first">Zena A.</forename><surname>Stein</surname></persName><affiliation>Joanne E. Mantell, Susie Hoffman and Theresa M. Exner are research scientists, and at the time of the study, Zena A. Stein was codirector, all at the HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York. Kim Atkins is senior vice resident, Community Healthcare Network, New York.<address><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation></author><author xml:id="author-0004"><persName><forename type="first">Kim</forename><surname>Atkins</surname></persName><affiliation>Joanne E. Mantell, Susie Hoffman and Theresa M. Exner are research scientists, and at the time of the study, Zena A. Stein was codirector, all at the HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York. Kim Atkins is senior vice resident, Community Healthcare Network, New York.<address><country key="US"></country></address></affiliation></author><idno type="istex">0CA2DDF15D41B129135370F9DD0613B317DB0AEE</idno><idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-BFMLKW61-J</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1363/3507103</idno><idno type="unit">PSRH71</idno><idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:PSRH.PSRH71.pdf</idno></analytic><monogr><title level="j" type="main">Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health</title><title level="j" type="alt">PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH</title><idno type="pISSN">1538-6341</idno><idno type="eISSN">1931-2393</idno><idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1931-2393</idno><idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/psrh.2003.35.issue-2</idno><idno type="product">PSRH</idno><idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">35</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="71">71</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="78">78</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2003-03"></date></imprint></monogr></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><abstract xml:lang="en" style="main"><p>
<hi rend="italic"><hi rend="bold">CONTEXT</hi>: Family planning providers can play an important role in helping women to identify their risk of HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and to adopt preventive measures. In‐depth investigation of providers' attitudes about approaches to STD risk assessment, contraceptive counseling and dual protection–concurrent protection from STDs and unintended pregnancy–has been limited.</hi>
</p><p>
<hi rend="italic"><hi rend="bold">METHODS</hi>: In semistructured interviews conducted in 1998, 22 health care providers from a large New York City agency offering contraceptive and STD services described how they balanced STD and pregnancy concerns, viewed risk assessment and assessed various contraceptive methods.</hi>
</p><p>
<hi rend="italic"><hi rend="bold">RESULTS</hi>: STD prevention was seen as an integral part of family planning counseling, and most providers believed that risk assessment should be conducted universally. Providers viewed dual protection as use of condoms along with an effective contraceptive; few advocated use of the male or female condom alone. The female condom was believed to be a disease prevention method of last resort and was considered appropriate only for specific groups of women. Although providers lacked understanding about the effectiveness of the female condom and how to counsel clients concerning its use, they expressed interest in learning more.</hi>
</p><p>
<hi rend="italic"><hi rend="bold">CONCLUSIONS</hi>: Training is needed to reduce providers' negative perceptions of the female condom and to reinforce the importance of individualized counseling tailored to women's specific circumstances. Studies are needed on how to encourage family planning providers to promote male and female condoms as effective contraceptive methods.</hi>
</p></abstract><langUsage><language ident="en"></language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><extension>txt</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0CA2DDF15D41B129135370F9DD0613B317DB0AEE/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1931-2393</doi><issn type="print">1538-6341</issn><issn type="electronic">1931-2393</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="PSRH"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH">Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="03002"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/psrh.2003.35.issue-2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="35">35</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2003-03">March 2003</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="0007100" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1363/3507103</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="PSRH71"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="8"></count></countGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2007-02-12"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2007-02-12"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-03-03"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-02-07"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-11-03"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="71">71</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="78">78</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Author contact: <email>jmantell@cnvlz.com</email></correspondenceTo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:PSRH.PSRH71.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="referenceTotal" number="48"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="6"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Family Planning Providers' Perspectives On Dual Protection</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Joanne E.</givenNames><familyName>Mantell</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr2" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Susie</givenNames><familyName>Hoffman</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr3" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Theresa M.</givenNames><familyName>Exner</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr4" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Zena A.</givenNames><familyName>Stein</familyName></personName></creator><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr5" affiliationRef="#a1"><personName><givenNames>Kim</givenNames><familyName>Atkins</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="a1" countryCode="US"><unparsedAffiliation>Joanne E. Mantell, Susie Hoffman and Theresa M. Exner are research scientists, and at the time of the study, Zena A. Stein was codirector, all at the HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York. Kim Atkins is senior vice resident, Community Healthcare Network, New York.</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p> <i><b>CONTEXT</b>: Family planning providers can play an important role in helping women to identify their risk of HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and to adopt preventive measures. In‐depth investigation of providers' attitudes about approaches to STD risk assessment, contraceptive counseling and dual protection–concurrent protection from STDs and unintended pregnancy–has been limited.</i> </p><p> <i><b>METHODS</b>: In semistructured interviews conducted in 1998, 22 health care providers from a large New York City agency offering contraceptive and STD services described how they balanced STD and pregnancy concerns, viewed risk assessment and assessed various contraceptive methods.</i> </p><p> <i><b>RESULTS</b>: STD prevention was seen as an integral part of family planning counseling, and most providers believed that risk assessment should be conducted universally. Providers viewed dual protection as use of condoms along with an effective contraceptive; few advocated use of the male or female condom alone. The female condom was believed to be a disease prevention method of last resort and was considered appropriate only for specific groups of women. Although providers lacked understanding about the effectiveness of the female condom and how to counsel clients concerning its use, they expressed interest in learning more.</i> </p><p> <i><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>: Training is needed to reduce providers' negative perceptions of the female condom and to reinforce the importance of individualized counseling tailored to women's specific circumstances. Studies are needed on how to encourage family planning providers to promote male and female condoms as effective contraceptive methods.</i> </p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Family Planning Providers' Perspectives On Dual Protection</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Family Planning Providers' Perspectives On Dual Protection</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Joanne E.</namePart><namePart type="family">Mantell</namePart><affiliation>Joanne E. Mantell, Susie Hoffman and Theresa M. Exner are research scientists, and at the time of the study, Zena A. Stein was codirector, all at the HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York. Kim Atkins is senior vice resident, Community Healthcare Network, New York.</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: jmantell@cnvlz.com</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Susie</namePart><namePart type="family">Hoffman</namePart><affiliation>Joanne E. Mantell, Susie Hoffman and Theresa M. Exner are research scientists, and at the time of the study, Zena A. Stein was codirector, all at the HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York. Kim Atkins is senior vice resident, Community Healthcare Network, New York.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Theresa M.</namePart><namePart type="family">Exner</namePart><affiliation>Joanne E. Mantell, Susie Hoffman and Theresa M. Exner are research scientists, and at the time of the study, Zena A. Stein was codirector, all at the HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York. Kim Atkins is senior vice resident, Community Healthcare Network, New York.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Zena A.</namePart><namePart type="family">Stein</namePart><affiliation>Joanne E. Mantell, Susie Hoffman and Theresa M. Exner are research scientists, and at the time of the study, Zena A. Stein was codirector, all at the HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York. Kim Atkins is senior vice resident, Community Healthcare Network, New York.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Kim</namePart><namePart type="family">Atkins</namePart><affiliation>Joanne E. Mantell, Susie Hoffman and Theresa M. Exner are research scientists, and at the time of the study, Zena A. Stein was codirector, all at the HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York. Kim Atkins is senior vice resident, Community Healthcare Network, New York.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2003-03</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2003</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><extent unit="references">48</extent><extent unit="linksCrossRef">6</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">CONTEXT: Family planning providers can play an important role in helping women to identify their risk of HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and to adopt preventive measures. In‐depth investigation of providers' attitudes about approaches to STD risk assessment, contraceptive counseling and dual protection–concurrent protection from STDs and unintended pregnancy–has been limited. METHODS: In semistructured interviews conducted in 1998, 22 health care providers from a large New York City agency offering contraceptive and STD services described how they balanced STD and pregnancy concerns, viewed risk assessment and assessed various contraceptive methods. RESULTS: STD prevention was seen as an integral part of family planning counseling, and most providers believed that risk assessment should be conducted universally. Providers viewed dual protection as use of condoms along with an effective contraceptive; few advocated use of the male or female condom alone. The female condom was believed to be a disease prevention method of last resort and was considered appropriate only for specific groups of women. Although providers lacked understanding about the effectiveness of the female condom and how to counsel clients concerning its use, they expressed interest in learning more. CONCLUSIONS: Training is needed to reduce providers' negative perceptions of the female condom and to reinforce the importance of individualized counseling tailored to women's specific circumstances. Studies are needed on how to encourage family planning providers to promote male and female condoms as effective contraceptive methods.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">1538-6341</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1931-2393</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1931-2393</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">PSRH</identifier><part><date>2003</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>35</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>71</start><end>78</end><total>8</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">0CA2DDF15D41B129135370F9DD0613B317DB0AEE</identifier><identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-BFMLKW61-J</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1363/3507103</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">PSRH71</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods><json:item><extension>json</extension><original>false</original><mimetype>application/json</mimetype><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/0CA2DDF15D41B129135370F9DD0613B317DB0AEE/metadata/json</uri></json:item></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/SidaSubSaharaV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000361 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000361 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Sante
|area= SidaSubSaharaV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:0CA2DDF15D41B129135370F9DD0613B317DB0AEE
|texte= Family Planning Providers' Perspectives On Dual Protection
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |