Le SIDA en Afrique subsaharienne (serveur d'exploration)

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Constructing Poverty Trends in Uganda: A Multidisciplinary Perspective

Identifieur interne : 000280 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000279; suivant : 000281

Constructing Poverty Trends in Uganda: A Multidisciplinary Perspective

Auteurs : Rosemary Mcgee

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:09FE8F6AB5597F06733D759C2E132455D4E4C12D

English descriptors

Abstract

In late 1999, apparently contradictory pictures of what was happening to poverty in Uganda emerged from the Participatory Poverty Assessment (PPA) and the household survey. This article analyses certain conceptual and methodological characteristics of the PPA and the pictures of poverty trends arising from it, with a view to dispelling confusion and to better understanding the relationship between these and the pictures emerging from survey data. It argues that the apparently contradictory visions, when explored carefully, are found to be compatible, and concludes that deeper and less oppositional understandings of the purpose of PPAs vis‐à‐vis surveys for poverty assessment are an important and timely contribution to current research and knowledge about poverty.

Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2004.00363.x

Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:09FE8F6AB5597F06733D759C2E132455D4E4C12D

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Constructing Poverty Trends in Uganda: A Multidisciplinary Perspective</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Mcgee, Rosemary" sort="Mcgee, Rosemary" uniqKey="Mcgee R" first="Rosemary" last="Mcgee">Rosemary Mcgee</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:09FE8F6AB5597F06733D759C2E132455D4E4C12D</idno>
<date when="2004" year="2004">2004</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-7660.2004.00363.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/09FE8F6AB5597F06733D759C2E132455D4E4C12D/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000280</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000280</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main">Constructing Poverty Trends in Uganda: A Multidisciplinary Perspective</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Mcgee, Rosemary" sort="Mcgee, Rosemary" uniqKey="Mcgee R" first="Rosemary" last="Mcgee">Rosemary Mcgee</name>
<affiliation>
<mods:affiliation>Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex</mods:affiliation>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Development and Change</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">DEVELOPMENT CHANGE</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0012-155X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1467-7660</idno>
<imprint>
<biblScope unit="vol">35</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="499">499</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="523">523</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">25</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd/Inc.</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK; Malden, USA</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2004-06">2004-06</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0012-155X</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0012-155X</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Analytical observations</term>
<term>Apparent contradictions</term>
<term>Apparent divergence</term>
<term>Appleton</term>
<term>Article analyses</term>
<term>Brock</term>
<term>Civil strife</term>
<term>Common property resources</term>
<term>Community development resource network</term>
<term>Community empowerment</term>
<term>Community histories</term>
<term>Comprehensive development framework</term>
<term>Consultancy report</term>
<term>Consumption data</term>
<term>Consumption shortfall</term>
<term>Contextual</term>
<term>Critical reflections</term>
<term>Current research</term>
<term>Decile</term>
<term>Development assistance committee</term>
<term>Development report</term>
<term>Development studies</term>
<term>Economic development</term>
<term>Enumeration areas</term>
<term>First round</term>
<term>Food insecurity</term>
<term>Food security</term>
<term>Gender</term>
<term>Gender dimensions</term>
<term>Gender issues</term>
<term>Health care</term>
<term>Household consumption</term>
<term>Household survey</term>
<term>Household survey approach</term>
<term>Household survey data</term>
<term>Household survey findings</term>
<term>Household surveys</term>
<term>Human rights</term>
<term>Hungry season</term>
<term>Income poverty</term>
<term>Intangible dimensions</term>
<term>Intermediate technology publications</term>
<term>International development</term>
<term>Interviewer effect</term>
<term>Kampala</term>
<term>Latin american perspectives</term>
<term>Less oppositional understandings</term>
<term>Many cases</term>
<term>Many households</term>
<term>Matrix</term>
<term>Mcgee</term>
<term>Methodological aspects</term>
<term>Mfped</term>
<term>Multiple dimensions</term>
<term>Nations development programme</term>
<term>Other aspects</term>
<term>Other factors</term>
<term>Other hand</term>
<term>Participant</term>
<term>Participatory</term>
<term>Participatory approaches</term>
<term>Participatory poverty assessment</term>
<term>Participatory research</term>
<term>Particular dimensions</term>
<term>Perverse consumption increases</term>
<term>Perverse increases</term>
<term>Policy change</term>
<term>Policy recommendations</term>
<term>Policy research exercise</term>
<term>Poor people</term>
<term>Poorest households</term>
<term>Population density</term>
<term>Poverty</term>
<term>Poverty analysis</term>
<term>Poverty assessment</term>
<term>Poverty assessment process</term>
<term>Poverty assessments</term>
<term>Poverty data</term>
<term>Poverty dynamics</term>
<term>Poverty eradication action plan</term>
<term>Poverty headcount</term>
<term>Poverty line</term>
<term>Poverty measurement</term>
<term>Poverty monitoring</term>
<term>Poverty monitoring unit</term>
<term>Poverty reduction</term>
<term>Poverty reduction strategy paper</term>
<term>Poverty status</term>
<term>Poverty trend findings</term>
<term>Poverty trends</term>
<term>Ppas</term>
<term>Preliminary findings</term>
<term>Qualitative</term>
<term>Qualitative data</term>
<term>Qualitative methods</term>
<term>Qualitative research</term>
<term>Quantitative data</term>
<term>Quantum leap</term>
<term>Research agenda</term>
<term>Researcher</term>
<term>Rosemary</term>
<term>Rosemary mcgee</term>
<term>Same site</term>
<term>Seasonal variations</term>
<term>Several sites</term>
<term>Show case</term>
<term>Site reports</term>
<term>Social studies</term>
<term>Success story</term>
<term>Survey data</term>
<term>Time intervals</term>
<term>Timely contribution</term>
<term>Trend data</term>
<term>Uganda</term>
<term>Uganda bureau</term>
<term>Uganda poverty status report</term>
<term>Ugandan</term>
<term>Understanding poverty</term>
<term>Undp</term>
<term>Unequivocal statement</term>
<term>Unhs</term>
<term>Unhs findings</term>
<term>Unpublished</term>
<term>Unpublished paper</term>
<term>Uppap</term>
<term>Uppap researchers</term>
<term>Uppap website</term>
<term>Water provision</term>
<term>World bank</term>
<term>World poverty assessments</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Analytical observations</term>
<term>Apparent contradictions</term>
<term>Apparent divergence</term>
<term>Appleton</term>
<term>Article analyses</term>
<term>Brock</term>
<term>Civil strife</term>
<term>Common property resources</term>
<term>Community development resource network</term>
<term>Community empowerment</term>
<term>Community histories</term>
<term>Comprehensive development framework</term>
<term>Consultancy report</term>
<term>Consumption data</term>
<term>Consumption shortfall</term>
<term>Contextual</term>
<term>Critical reflections</term>
<term>Current research</term>
<term>Decile</term>
<term>Development assistance committee</term>
<term>Development report</term>
<term>Development studies</term>
<term>Economic development</term>
<term>Enumeration areas</term>
<term>First round</term>
<term>Food insecurity</term>
<term>Food security</term>
<term>Gender</term>
<term>Gender dimensions</term>
<term>Gender issues</term>
<term>Health care</term>
<term>Household consumption</term>
<term>Household survey</term>
<term>Household survey approach</term>
<term>Household survey data</term>
<term>Household survey findings</term>
<term>Household surveys</term>
<term>Human rights</term>
<term>Hungry season</term>
<term>Income poverty</term>
<term>Intangible dimensions</term>
<term>Intermediate technology publications</term>
<term>International development</term>
<term>Interviewer effect</term>
<term>Kampala</term>
<term>Latin american perspectives</term>
<term>Less oppositional understandings</term>
<term>Many cases</term>
<term>Many households</term>
<term>Matrix</term>
<term>Mcgee</term>
<term>Methodological aspects</term>
<term>Mfped</term>
<term>Multiple dimensions</term>
<term>Nations development programme</term>
<term>Other aspects</term>
<term>Other factors</term>
<term>Other hand</term>
<term>Participant</term>
<term>Participatory</term>
<term>Participatory approaches</term>
<term>Participatory poverty assessment</term>
<term>Participatory research</term>
<term>Particular dimensions</term>
<term>Perverse consumption increases</term>
<term>Perverse increases</term>
<term>Policy change</term>
<term>Policy recommendations</term>
<term>Policy research exercise</term>
<term>Poor people</term>
<term>Poorest households</term>
<term>Population density</term>
<term>Poverty</term>
<term>Poverty analysis</term>
<term>Poverty assessment</term>
<term>Poverty assessment process</term>
<term>Poverty assessments</term>
<term>Poverty data</term>
<term>Poverty dynamics</term>
<term>Poverty eradication action plan</term>
<term>Poverty headcount</term>
<term>Poverty line</term>
<term>Poverty measurement</term>
<term>Poverty monitoring</term>
<term>Poverty monitoring unit</term>
<term>Poverty reduction</term>
<term>Poverty reduction strategy paper</term>
<term>Poverty status</term>
<term>Poverty trend findings</term>
<term>Poverty trends</term>
<term>Ppas</term>
<term>Preliminary findings</term>
<term>Qualitative</term>
<term>Qualitative data</term>
<term>Qualitative methods</term>
<term>Qualitative research</term>
<term>Quantitative data</term>
<term>Quantum leap</term>
<term>Research agenda</term>
<term>Researcher</term>
<term>Rosemary</term>
<term>Rosemary mcgee</term>
<term>Same site</term>
<term>Seasonal variations</term>
<term>Several sites</term>
<term>Show case</term>
<term>Site reports</term>
<term>Social studies</term>
<term>Success story</term>
<term>Survey data</term>
<term>Time intervals</term>
<term>Timely contribution</term>
<term>Trend data</term>
<term>Uganda</term>
<term>Uganda bureau</term>
<term>Uganda poverty status report</term>
<term>Ugandan</term>
<term>Understanding poverty</term>
<term>Undp</term>
<term>Unequivocal statement</term>
<term>Unhs</term>
<term>Unhs findings</term>
<term>Unpublished</term>
<term>Unpublished paper</term>
<term>Uppap</term>
<term>Uppap researchers</term>
<term>Uppap website</term>
<term>Water provision</term>
<term>World bank</term>
<term>World poverty assessments</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In late 1999, apparently contradictory pictures of what was happening to poverty in Uganda emerged from the Participatory Poverty Assessment (PPA) and the household survey. This article analyses certain conceptual and methodological characteristics of the PPA and the pictures of poverty trends arising from it, with a view to dispelling confusion and to better understanding the relationship between these and the pictures emerging from survey data. It argues that the apparently contradictory visions, when explored carefully, are found to be compatible, and concludes that deeper and less oppositional understandings of the purpose of PPAs vis‐à‐vis surveys for poverty assessment are an important and timely contribution to current research and knowledge about poverty.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<istex>
<corpusName>wiley</corpusName>
<keywords>
<teeft>
<json:string>uganda</json:string>
<json:string>uppap</json:string>
<json:string>participatory</json:string>
<json:string>unhs</json:string>
<json:string>mcgee</json:string>
<json:string>mfped</json:string>
<json:string>poverty trends</json:string>
<json:string>kampala</json:string>
<json:string>ppas</json:string>
<json:string>poverty assessment</json:string>
<json:string>economic development</json:string>
<json:string>household surveys</json:string>
<json:string>world bank</json:string>
<json:string>ugandan</json:string>
<json:string>participatory research</json:string>
<json:string>household survey</json:string>
<json:string>brock</json:string>
<json:string>contextual</json:string>
<json:string>rosemary mcgee</json:string>
<json:string>appleton</json:string>
<json:string>survey data</json:string>
<json:string>undp</json:string>
<json:string>poverty reduction</json:string>
<json:string>decile</json:string>
<json:string>rosemary</json:string>
<json:string>household consumption</json:string>
<json:string>household survey data</json:string>
<json:string>poverty</json:string>
<json:string>matrix</json:string>
<json:string>quantitative data</json:string>
<json:string>policy change</json:string>
<json:string>consumption data</json:string>
<json:string>participatory poverty assessment</json:string>
<json:string>unhs findings</json:string>
<json:string>population density</json:string>
<json:string>analytical observations</json:string>
<json:string>success story</json:string>
<json:string>methodological aspects</json:string>
<json:string>poverty analysis</json:string>
<json:string>qualitative methods</json:string>
<json:string>other hand</json:string>
<json:string>participatory approaches</json:string>
<json:string>comprehensive development framework</json:string>
<json:string>civil strife</json:string>
<json:string>understanding poverty</json:string>
<json:string>uppap researchers</json:string>
<json:string>development report</json:string>
<json:string>time intervals</json:string>
<json:string>show case</json:string>
<json:string>food insecurity</json:string>
<json:string>poverty trend findings</json:string>
<json:string>poverty headcount</json:string>
<json:string>unpublished paper</json:string>
<json:string>international development</json:string>
<json:string>critical reflections</json:string>
<json:string>development studies</json:string>
<json:string>intermediate technology publications</json:string>
<json:string>perverse consumption increases</json:string>
<json:string>poverty monitoring unit</json:string>
<json:string>research agenda</json:string>
<json:string>community empowerment</json:string>
<json:string>same site</json:string>
<json:string>qualitative research</json:string>
<json:string>uganda poverty status report</json:string>
<json:string>gender issues</json:string>
<json:string>latin american perspectives</json:string>
<json:string>household survey approach</json:string>
<json:string>apparent divergence</json:string>
<json:string>household survey findings</json:string>
<json:string>consultancy report</json:string>
<json:string>uppap website</json:string>
<json:string>timely contribution</json:string>
<json:string>social studies</json:string>
<json:string>multiple dimensions</json:string>
<json:string>current research</json:string>
<json:string>enumeration areas</json:string>
<json:string>common property resources</json:string>
<json:string>human rights</json:string>
<json:string>poverty assessment process</json:string>
<json:string>less oppositional understandings</json:string>
<json:string>food security</json:string>
<json:string>preliminary findings</json:string>
<json:string>nations development programme</json:string>
<json:string>several sites</json:string>
<json:string>gender dimensions</json:string>
<json:string>poverty eradication action plan</json:string>
<json:string>site reports</json:string>
<json:string>hungry season</json:string>
<json:string>seasonal variations</json:string>
<json:string>poverty status</json:string>
<json:string>health care</json:string>
<json:string>intangible dimensions</json:string>
<json:string>trend data</json:string>
<json:string>interviewer effect</json:string>
<json:string>uganda bureau</json:string>
<json:string>income poverty</json:string>
<json:string>consumption shortfall</json:string>
<json:string>community histories</json:string>
<json:string>other aspects</json:string>
<json:string>community development resource network</json:string>
<json:string>poverty dynamics</json:string>
<json:string>first round</json:string>
<json:string>water provision</json:string>
<json:string>poorest households</json:string>
<json:string>poverty assessments</json:string>
<json:string>particular dimensions</json:string>
<json:string>poor people</json:string>
<json:string>unequivocal statement</json:string>
<json:string>article analyses</json:string>
<json:string>perverse increases</json:string>
<json:string>many households</json:string>
<json:string>other factors</json:string>
<json:string>quantum leap</json:string>
<json:string>poverty data</json:string>
<json:string>policy recommendations</json:string>
<json:string>poverty monitoring</json:string>
<json:string>development assistance committee</json:string>
<json:string>world poverty assessments</json:string>
<json:string>poverty line</json:string>
<json:string>poverty measurement</json:string>
<json:string>apparent contradictions</json:string>
<json:string>poverty reduction strategy paper</json:string>
<json:string>policy research exercise</json:string>
<json:string>qualitative data</json:string>
<json:string>many cases</json:string>
<json:string>researcher</json:string>
<json:string>qualitative</json:string>
<json:string>participant</json:string>
<json:string>gender</json:string>
<json:string>unpublished</json:string>
</teeft>
</keywords>
<author>
<json:item>
<name>Rosemary McGee</name>
<affiliations>
<json:string>Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex</json:string>
</affiliations>
</json:item>
</author>
<articleId>
<json:string>DECH363</json:string>
</articleId>
<language>
<json:string>eng</json:string>
</language>
<originalGenre>
<json:string>article</json:string>
</originalGenre>
<abstract>In late 1999, apparently contradictory pictures of what was happening to poverty in Uganda emerged from the Participatory Poverty Assessment (PPA) and the household survey. This article analyses certain conceptual and methodological characteristics of the PPA and the pictures of poverty trends arising from it, with a view to dispelling confusion and to better understanding the relationship between these and the pictures emerging from survey data. It argues that the apparently contradictory visions, when explored carefully, are found to be compatible, and concludes that deeper and less oppositional understandings of the purpose of PPAs vis‐à‐vis surveys for poverty assessment are an important and timely contribution to current research and knowledge about poverty.</abstract>
<qualityIndicators>
<score>6.844</score>
<pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion>
<pdfPageSize>431 x 649 pts</pdfPageSize>
<refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative>
<abstractCharCount>773</abstractCharCount>
<pdfWordCount>10809</pdfWordCount>
<pdfCharCount>67033</pdfCharCount>
<pdfPageCount>26</pdfPageCount>
<abstractWordCount>112</abstractWordCount>
</qualityIndicators>
<title>Constructing Poverty Trends in Uganda: A Multidisciplinary Perspective</title>
<genre>
<json:string>article</json:string>
</genre>
<host>
<title>Development and Change</title>
<language>
<json:string>unknown</json:string>
</language>
<doi>
<json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1467-7660</json:string>
</doi>
<issn>
<json:string>0012-155X</json:string>
</issn>
<eissn>
<json:string>1467-7660</json:string>
</eissn>
<publisherId>
<json:string>DECH</json:string>
</publisherId>
<volume>35</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<pages>
<first>499</first>
<last>523</last>
<total>25</total>
</pages>
<genre>
<json:string>journal</json:string>
</genre>
</host>
<categories>
<wos>
<json:string>social science</json:string>
<json:string>planning & development</json:string>
</wos>
<scienceMetrix>
<json:string>economic & social sciences</json:string>
<json:string>economics & business </json:string>
<json:string>development studies</json:string>
</scienceMetrix>
<inist>
<json:string>sciences humaines et sociales</json:string>
</inist>
</categories>
<publicationDate>2004</publicationDate>
<copyrightDate>2004</copyrightDate>
<doi>
<json:string>10.1111/j.1467-7660.2004.00363.x</json:string>
</doi>
<id>09FE8F6AB5597F06733D759C2E132455D4E4C12D</id>
<score>1</score>
<fulltext>
<json:item>
<extension>pdf</extension>
<original>true</original>
<mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/09FE8F6AB5597F06733D759C2E132455D4E4C12D/fulltext/pdf</uri>
</json:item>
<json:item>
<extension>zip</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/zip</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/09FE8F6AB5597F06733D759C2E132455D4E4C12D/fulltext/zip</uri>
</json:item>
<istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/09FE8F6AB5597F06733D759C2E132455D4E4C12D/fulltext/tei">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title level="a" type="main">Constructing Poverty Trends in Uganda: A Multidisciplinary Perspective</title>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>ISTEX</authority>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd/Inc.</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK; Malden, USA</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2004-06"></date>
</publicationStmt>
<notesStmt>
<note type="content-type" subtype="article" source="article" scheme="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</note>
<note type="publication-type" subtype="journal" scheme="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</note>
</notesStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct type="article">
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main">Constructing Poverty Trends in Uganda: A Multidisciplinary Perspective</title>
<title level="a" type="short">Constructing Poverty Trends in Uganda</title>
<author xml:id="author-0000">
<persName>
<forename type="first">Rosemary</forename>
<surname>McGee</surname>
</persName>
<affiliation>Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex</affiliation>
</author>
<idno type="istex">09FE8F6AB5597F06733D759C2E132455D4E4C12D</idno>
<idno type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-N8LZ5CRK-8</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1467-7660.2004.00363.x</idno>
<idno type="unit">DECH363</idno>
<idno type="toTypesetVersion">file:DECH.DECH363.pdf</idno>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<title level="j" type="main">Development and Change</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">DEVELOPMENT CHANGE</title>
<idno type="pISSN">0012-155X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1467-7660</idno>
<idno type="book-DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-7660</idno>
<idno type="book-part-DOI">10.1111/dech.2004.35.issue-3</idno>
<idno type="product">DECH</idno>
<idno type="publisherDivision">ST</idno>
<imprint>
<biblScope unit="vol">35</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="499">499</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="523">523</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">25</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd/Inc.</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK; Malden, USA</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2004-06"></date>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<abstract xml:lang="en" style="main">
<head>Abstract</head>
<p>In late 1999, apparently contradictory pictures of what was happening to poverty in Uganda emerged from the Participatory Poverty Assessment (PPA) and the household survey. This article analyses certain conceptual and methodological characteristics of the PPA and the pictures of poverty trends arising from it, with a view to dispelling confusion and to better understanding the relationship between these and the pictures emerging from survey data. It argues that the apparently contradictory visions, when explored carefully, are found to be compatible, and concludes that deeper and less oppositional understandings of the purpose of PPAs
<hi rend="italic">vis‐à‐vis</hi>
surveys for poverty assessment are an important and timely contribution to current research and knowledge about poverty.</p>
</abstract>
<textClass>
<keywords rend="tocHeading1">
<term>Original Articles</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en"></language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
</istex:fulltextTEI>
<json:item>
<extension>txt</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>text/plain</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/09FE8F6AB5597F06733D759C2E132455D4E4C12D/fulltext/txt</uri>
</json:item>
</fulltext>
<metadata>
<istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body">
<istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration>
<istex:document>
<component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en">
<header>
<publicationMeta level="product">
<publisherInfo>
<publisherName>Blackwell Publishing Ltd/Inc.</publisherName>
<publisherLoc>Oxford, UK; Malden, USA</publisherLoc>
</publisherInfo>
<doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-7660</doi>
<issn type="print">0012-155X</issn>
<issn type="electronic">1467-7660</issn>
<idGroup>
<id type="product" value="DECH"></id>
<id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id>
</idGroup>
<titleGroup>
<title type="main" sort="DEVELOPMENT CHANGE">Development and Change</title>
</titleGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="part" position="06003">
<doi origin="wiley">10.1111/dech.2004.35.issue-3</doi>
<numberingGroup>
<numbering type="journalVolume" number="35">35</numbering>
<numbering type="journalIssue" number="3">3</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<coverDate startDate="2004-06">June 2004</coverDate>
</publicationMeta>
<publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="5" status="forIssue">
<doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.1467-7660.2004.00363.x</doi>
<idGroup>
<id type="unit" value="DECH363"></id>
</idGroup>
<countGroup>
<count type="pageTotal" number="25"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup>
<title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title>
</titleGroup>
<eventGroup>
<event type="firstOnline" date="2004-07-12"></event>
<event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2004-07-12"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:Header result:Header" date="2010-03-08"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-17"></event>
<event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-16"></event>
</eventGroup>
<numberingGroup>
<numbering type="pageFirst" number="499">499</numbering>
<numbering type="pageLast" number="523">523</numbering>
</numberingGroup>
<linkGroup>
<link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:DECH.DECH363.pdf"></link>
</linkGroup>
</publicationMeta>
<contentMeta>
<countGroup>
<count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count>
<count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count>
<count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count>
<count type="referenceTotal" number="54"></count>
<count type="wordTotal" number="0"></count>
<count type="linksPubMed" number="0"></count>
<count type="linksCrossRef" number="0"></count>
</countGroup>
<titleGroup>
<title type="main">Constructing Poverty Trends in Uganda: A Multidisciplinary Perspective</title>
<title type="shortAuthors">Rosemary McGee</title>
<title type="short">Constructing Poverty Trends in Uganda</title>
</titleGroup>
<creators>
<creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#a1">
<personName>
<givenNames>Rosemary</givenNames>
<familyName>McGee</familyName>
</personName>
</creator>
</creators>
<affiliationGroup>
<affiliation xml:id="a1">
<unparsedAffiliation>Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex</unparsedAffiliation>
</affiliation>
</affiliationGroup>
<abstractGroup>
<abstract type="main" xml:lang="en">
<title type="main">Abstract</title>
<p>In late 1999, apparently contradictory pictures of what was happening to poverty in Uganda emerged from the Participatory Poverty Assessment (PPA) and the household survey. This article analyses certain conceptual and methodological characteristics of the PPA and the pictures of poverty trends arising from it, with a view to dispelling confusion and to better understanding the relationship between these and the pictures emerging from survey data. It argues that the apparently contradictory visions, when explored carefully, are found to be compatible, and concludes that deeper and less oppositional understandings of the purpose of PPAs
<i>vis‐à‐vis</i>
surveys for poverty assessment are an important and timely contribution to current research and knowledge about poverty.</p>
</abstract>
</abstractGroup>
</contentMeta>
</header>
</component>
</istex:document>
</istex:metadataXml>
<mods version="3.6">
<titleInfo lang="en">
<title>Constructing Poverty Trends in Uganda: A Multidisciplinary Perspective</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="abbreviated" lang="en">
<title>Constructing Poverty Trends in Uganda</title>
</titleInfo>
<titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en">
<title>Constructing Poverty Trends in Uganda: A Multidisciplinary Perspective</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Rosemary</namePart>
<namePart type="family">McGee</namePart>
<affiliation>Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex</affiliation>
<role>
<roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre type="article" displayLabel="article" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://content-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XTP-6N5SZHKN-D">article</genre>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd/Inc.</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK; Malden, USA</placeTerm>
</place>
<dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2004-06</dateIssued>
<copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2004</copyrightDate>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<extent unit="figures">0</extent>
<extent unit="tables">0</extent>
<extent unit="formulas">0</extent>
<extent unit="references">54</extent>
<extent unit="linksCrossRef">0</extent>
<extent unit="words">0</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<abstract lang="en">In late 1999, apparently contradictory pictures of what was happening to poverty in Uganda emerged from the Participatory Poverty Assessment (PPA) and the household survey. This article analyses certain conceptual and methodological characteristics of the PPA and the pictures of poverty trends arising from it, with a view to dispelling confusion and to better understanding the relationship between these and the pictures emerging from survey data. It argues that the apparently contradictory visions, when explored carefully, are found to be compatible, and concludes that deeper and less oppositional understandings of the purpose of PPAs vis‐à‐vis surveys for poverty assessment are an important and timely contribution to current research and knowledge about poverty.</abstract>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Development and Change</title>
</titleInfo>
<genre type="journal" authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://publication-type.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/JMC-0GLKJH51-B">journal</genre>
<identifier type="ISSN">0012-155X</identifier>
<identifier type="eISSN">1467-7660</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-7660</identifier>
<identifier type="PublisherID">DECH</identifier>
<part>
<date>2004</date>
<detail type="volume">
<caption>vol.</caption>
<number>35</number>
</detail>
<detail type="issue">
<caption>no.</caption>
<number>3</number>
</detail>
<extent unit="pages">
<start>499</start>
<end>523</end>
<total>25</total>
</extent>
</part>
</relatedItem>
<identifier type="istex">09FE8F6AB5597F06733D759C2E132455D4E4C12D</identifier>
<identifier type="ark">ark:/67375/WNG-N8LZ5CRK-8</identifier>
<identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.1467-7660.2004.00363.x</identifier>
<identifier type="ArticleID">DECH363</identifier>
<recordInfo>
<recordContentSource authority="ISTEX" authorityURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr" valueURI="https://loaded-corpus.data.istex.fr/ark:/67375/XBH-L0C46X92-X">wiley</recordContentSource>
<recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing Ltd/Inc.</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo>
</mods>
<json:item>
<extension>json</extension>
<original>false</original>
<mimetype>application/json</mimetype>
<uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/09FE8F6AB5597F06733D759C2E132455D4E4C12D/metadata/json</uri>
</json:item>
</metadata>
<serie></serie>
</istex>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/SidaSubSaharaV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000280 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000280 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Sante
   |area=    SidaSubSaharaV1
   |flux=    Istex
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:09FE8F6AB5597F06733D759C2E132455D4E4C12D
   |texte=   Constructing Poverty Trends in Uganda: A Multidisciplinary Perspective
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Mon Nov 13 19:31:10 2017. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 19:14:32 2024