Links to Exploration step
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Spatiotemporal coupling between speech and manual motor actions</title><author><name sortKey="Parrell, Benjamin" sort="Parrell, Benjamin" uniqKey="Parrell B" first="Benjamin" last="Parrell">Benjamin Parrell</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="A1"> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Goldstein, Louis" sort="Goldstein, Louis" uniqKey="Goldstein L" first="Louis" last="Goldstein">Louis Goldstein</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="A1"> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA</nlm:aff></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:aff id="A2"> Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, USA</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lee, Sungbok" sort="Lee, Sungbok" uniqKey="Lee S" first="Sungbok" last="Lee">Sungbok Lee</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="A1"> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Byrd, Dani" sort="Byrd, Dani" uniqKey="Byrd D" first="Dani" last="Byrd">Dani Byrd</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="A1"> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA</nlm:aff></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">24465063</idno><idno type="pmc">3900246</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3900246</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:3900246</idno><idno type="doi">10.1016/j.wocn.2013.11.002</idno><date when="2014">2014</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000167</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">000167</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Spatiotemporal coupling between speech and manual motor actions</title><author><name sortKey="Parrell, Benjamin" sort="Parrell, Benjamin" uniqKey="Parrell B" first="Benjamin" last="Parrell">Benjamin Parrell</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="A1"> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Goldstein, Louis" sort="Goldstein, Louis" uniqKey="Goldstein L" first="Louis" last="Goldstein">Louis Goldstein</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="A1"> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA</nlm:aff></affiliation><affiliation><nlm:aff id="A2"> Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, USA</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lee, Sungbok" sort="Lee, Sungbok" uniqKey="Lee S" first="Sungbok" last="Lee">Sungbok Lee</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="A1"> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Byrd, Dani" sort="Byrd, Dani" uniqKey="Byrd D" first="Dani" last="Byrd">Dani Byrd</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="A1"> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA</nlm:aff></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Journal of phonetics</title><idno type="ISSN">0095-4470</idno><imprint><date when="2014">2014</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p id="P1">Much evidence has been found for pervasive links between the manual and speech motor systems, including evidence from infant development, deictic pointing, and repetitive tapping and speaking tasks. We expand on the last of these paradigms to look at intra- and cross-modal effects of emphatic stress, as well as the effects of coordination in the absence of explicit rhythm. In this study, subjects repeatedly tapped their finger and synchronously repeated a single spoken syllable. On each trial, subjects placed an emphatic stress on one finger tap or one spoken syllable. Results show that both movement duration and magnitude are affected by emphatic stress regardless of whether that stress is in the same domain (e.g., effects on the oral articulators when a spoken repetition is stressed) or across domains (e.g., effects on the oral articulators when a tap is stressed). Though the size of the effects differs between intra-and cross-domain emphases, the implementation of stress affects both motor domains, indicating a tight connection. This close coupling is seen even in the absence of stress, though it is highlighted under stress. The results of this study support the idea that implementation of prosody is not domain-specific but relies on general aspects of the motor system.</p></div></front></TEI><pmc article-type="research-article"><pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<pmc-dir>properties manuscript</pmc-dir>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-journal-id">101135037</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="pubmed-jr-id">33861</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">J Phon</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">J Phon</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of phonetics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0095-4470</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">24465063</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">3900246</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.wocn.2013.11.002</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="manuscript">NIHMS545146</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Spatiotemporal coupling between speech and manual motor actions</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Parrell</surname><given-names>Benjamin</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">a</xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="CR1">*</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Goldstein</surname><given-names>Louis</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">a</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">b</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>Sungbok</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">a</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Byrd</surname><given-names>Dani</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">a</xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="A1"><label>a</label> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA</aff><aff id="A2"><label>b</label> Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, USA</aff><author-notes><corresp id="CR1"><label>*</label>Corresponding author: <email>parrell@usc.edu</email>, Tel: (213) 740 - 2986, Fax: (213) 740-9306</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="nihms-submitted"><day>15</day><month>1</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>1</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="pmc-release"><day>01</day><month>1</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>42</volume><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>11</lpage><pmc-comment>elocation-id from pubmed: 10.1016/j.wocn.2013.11.002</pmc-comment>
<permissions><copyright-statement>© 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2013</copyright-year></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2013.11.002"></self-uri><abstract><p id="P1">Much evidence has been found for pervasive links between the manual and speech motor systems, including evidence from infant development, deictic pointing, and repetitive tapping and speaking tasks. We expand on the last of these paradigms to look at intra- and cross-modal effects of emphatic stress, as well as the effects of coordination in the absence of explicit rhythm. In this study, subjects repeatedly tapped their finger and synchronously repeated a single spoken syllable. On each trial, subjects placed an emphatic stress on one finger tap or one spoken syllable. Results show that both movement duration and magnitude are affected by emphatic stress regardless of whether that stress is in the same domain (e.g., effects on the oral articulators when a spoken repetition is stressed) or across domains (e.g., effects on the oral articulators when a tap is stressed). Though the size of the effects differs between intra-and cross-domain emphases, the implementation of stress affects both motor domains, indicating a tight connection. This close coupling is seen even in the absence of stress, though it is highlighted under stress. The results of this study support the idea that implementation of prosody is not domain-specific but relies on general aspects of the motor system.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Speech</kwd><kwd>manual gesture</kwd><kwd>prosody</kwd><kwd>motor coordination</kwd><kwd>motor timing</kwd><kwd>synchronization</kwd><kwd>articulation</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><award-group><funding-source country="United States">National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders : NIDCD</funding-source><award-id>R01 DC003172 || DC</award-id></award-group></funding-group></article-meta></front></pmc></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Linguistique/explor/TamazightV2/Data/Pmc/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000167 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000167 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Linguistique
|area= TamazightV2
|flux= Pmc
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé=
|texte=
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |